This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, M.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cohen, M.E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Consive Review: Analysis of Ordinal Dental Data: Evaluation of Conflicting Recommendations

Naval Dental Research Institute, Building 1-H, 310A B Street, Great Lakes, IL 60088-5259, mark.cohen{at}ndri.med.navy.mil

Although recommendations for the appropriate analysis of non-normal and ordinal-scaled data have appeared in the dental research literature for many years, there is no consensus. When one is conducting statistical tests for differences between groups, the central concern is whether it is safe to use parametric tests (e. g., analysis of variance), or if only non-parametric ranking tests should be considered. Relevant statistical and scientific issues associated with non-normality and measurement scale are reviewed, and three conclusions are reached regarding the analysis of dental data: (1) Parametric tests are sufficiently robust relative to typical violations of normality; (2) presumed statistical prohibitions against the application of parametric methods to ordinal data do not actually exist; and (3) 'ordinal' dental indices have sufficient quantitative meaning to be considered quasi-interval. For these reasons, parametric tests should not be avoided; they will be valid and usually more powerful and more easily applied to complex designs than nonparametric alternatives.

Key Words: parametric statistics • nonparametric statistics • measurement scales • non-normality • dental indices.

REFERENCES

• Anderson NH (1961). Scales and statistics: parametric and nonparametric. Psych Bull 58:305-316.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Armstrong GD (1981). Parametric statistics and ordinal data: a pervasive misconception. Nursing Res 30:60-62.
• Baumgardner KR (1997). A review of key research design and statistical analysis issues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 84:550-556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bulman JS, Osborne JF (1989a). Significance tests. Part 2. Br Dent J 166:218-221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bulman JS, Osborne JF (1989b). Significance tests. Part 3. Br Dent J 166:261-264.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chilton NW, editor (1986). Conference on clinical trials in periodontal disease. Proceedings, May 21-23, 1985, Chicago. J Clin Periodontol 13:335-549.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chilton NW, editor (1992). Conference on equivalency and superiority claims for products for gingivitis and periodontitis. Proceedings, May 14-16, 1991, Chicago. J Periodont Res 27(part 2):305-456.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Conover WJ (1980). Practical non-parametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 216-217.
• D'Agostino RB, Chase W., Belanger A. (1988). The appropriateness of some common procedures for testing the equality of two independent binomial populations. Am Statistician 42:198-202.[CrossRef]
• Daniel WW (1995). Biostatistics: a foundation of analysis in the health sciences. 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 569.
• Dawson-Saunders B., Trapp RG (1994). Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton and Lange, pp. 106, 330-331.
• Erickson JD (1973). Statistical tests for the OHI-S and PI: a commentary. J Dent Res 52:36-39.
• Gaito J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: resurgence of an old misconception. Psych Bull 87:564-567.[CrossRef]
• Glass RL, Alman JE, Fleisch S., D'Agostino RB (1972). The appropriateness of analysis of variance to the statistical analyses of dental clinical trials. Arch Oral Biol 17:633-643.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Harshbarger TR (1971). Introductory statistics: a decision map. New York: Macmillan, p. 109.
• Hayes WL (1963). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, p. 238.
• Heeren T., D'Agostino RB (1987). Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal scaled data. Stat Med 6:79-90.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Lorton L., Rethman MP (1990). Statistics: curse of the writing class. J Endodon 16:13-18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Michell J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: a clash of paradigms. Psych Bull 100:398-407.[CrossRef]
• Siegel S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 19.
• Stevens SS (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103:677-680.[Free Full Text]
• Sullivan LM, D'Agostino RB (1992). Robustness of the t test applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects. J Dent Res 71:1938-1943.
• Thomas H. (1985). Measurement structures and statistics. In: Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Vol. 5. Kotz S, Johnson NL, editors. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 381-386.
• Townsend JT, Ashby FG (1984). Measurement scales and statistics: the misconception misconceived. Psych Bull 96:394-401.[CrossRef]
• Velleman PF, Wilkinson L. (1993). Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio typologies are misleading. Am Statistician 47:65-72.[CrossRef]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 80, No. 1, 309-313 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800010301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A E Sanders, G D Slade, M T John, J G Steele, A L Suominen-Taipale, S Lahti, N M Nuttall, and P F. Allen A cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology J Epidemiol Community Health, July 1, 2009; 63(7): 569 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Song, C. Jerosch-Herold, R. Holland, M. d. L. Drachler, K. Mares, and I. Harvey Statistical methods for analysing Barthel scores in trials of poststroke interventions: a review and computer simulations Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 347 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Burns, A.-M. Keenan, and A. Redmond Foot Type and Overuse Injury in Triathletes J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2005; 95(3): 235 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.B. Imrey and A. Kingman Analysis of Clinical Trials Involving Non-cavitated Caries Lesions Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C103 - C108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cohen, M.E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cohen, M.E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?