|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Effect of Moist vs. Dry Bonding to Normal vs. Caries-affected Dentin with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus
M. Nakajima
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
H. Sano
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
L. Zheng
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
J. Tagami
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
D.H. Pashley
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-1129, USA
Recent research in dentin bonding demonstrated the superiority of moist bonding over dry bonding on normal dentin, but it is unclear if this technique is also superior in bonding to caries-affected dentin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SEM appearance and bond strength of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SMPP) to normal vs. caries-affected dentin bonded under moist vs. dry conditions, with and without polyalkenoic acid in the primer. Extracted carious human third molars were ground down by means of 600-grit SiC paper until the carious dentin no longer stained with caries detector solution. The flat surfaces were then primed, bonded, and built up with resin composite. After soaking in water for 1 day, the teeth were serially sectioned vertically into 5 or 6 slabs 0.7 mm thick. The bonded caries-affected areas were isolated by means of an ultrafine diamond bur to create an hourglass configuration with a cross-sectional area of 0.9 mm2. Bonded normal dentin was isolated the same way. Each specimen was attached to a Bencor device and tested in tension to failure. SMPP bonds to dry, normal dentin were only half as strong (21 ± 10 MPa, x ± SD) as those made to moist, normal dentin (42 ± 9 MPa, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between bonds made to normal vs. caries-affected dentin by means of the moist technique (42 ± 9 vs. 48 ± 4 MPa, respectively). Removal of the polyalkenoic acid from the primer lowered (p < 0.05) the bond strength of SMPP to caries-affected dentin (38 ± 8 MPa). The benefits of moist bonding extend to caries-affected dentin. The polyalkenoic acid in the SMPP primer contributes to the high bond strength that can be achieved to caries-affected dentin.
Key Words: dentin bonding • carious dentin • resin adhesion
REFERENCES
- Finger WJ, Inoue M., Asmussen E. (1994). Effect of wetability of adhesive resins on bonding to dentin. Am J Dent 7:35-38.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fusayama T., Okuse K., Hosoda H. (1966). Relationship between hardness, discoloration, and bacterial invasion in carious dentin. J Dent Res 45:1033-1046.
- Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. (1992). Interfacial morphology of resin composite and shiny erosion lesion. Am J Dent 5:315-317.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hanks LT, Wataha JC, Porsell RR, Strawn SE, Fat JC (1994). Permeability of biological and synthetic, molecules through dentine. J Oral Rehabil 21:475-487.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kanca J. (1992). Resin bonding to wet substrates. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23:39-41.
- Kanca J. (1996). Wet bonding: effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 9:273-276.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Marshall SJ, Wu-Magidi J-C., Balooch M., Kinney JH, Marshall GW (1997). Mechanical properties of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone (abstract). J Dent Res 76(Spec Iss):315.
- Nakabayashi N., Pashley DH (1998). Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo, Japan: Quintessence Publishing Co., Ltd.
- Nakajima M., Sano H., Burrow MF, Tagami J., Yoshiyama M., Ebisu S., et al. (1995). Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 74:1679-1688.
- Ogawa K., Yamashita Y., Ichijo T., Fusayama T. (1983). The ultrastructure and hardness of the transparent layer of human carious dentin. J Dent Res 62:7-10.
- Pashley DH, Ciucchi BC, Sano H., Horner JA (1993). Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quintessence Int 24:618-631.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pashley DH, Sano H., Ciucchi B., Yoshiyama M., Carvalho RM (1995). Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agent: a review. Dent Mater 11:117-125.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Perinka L., Sano H., Hosoda H. (1992). Dentin thickness, hardness and Ca-concentration versus bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 8:229-233.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sano H. ( 1987). Relationship between caries detector staining and structural characteristics of carious dentin. J Stomatol Soc Jpn 54:241-270.
- Sano H., Sonoda H., Shono T., Takatsu T., Ciucchi B., Carvalho R., et al. (1994). Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-240.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sano H., Takatsu T., Ciucchi B., Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH (1995). Nano-leakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 10:18-25.
- Shimizu C., Yanashita Y., Ichijo T., Fusayama T. (1981). Carious change of dentin observed on long span ultrathin sections. J Dent Res 60:1826-1831.
- Tay FR (1997). An interactive micromorphological study of resin infiltration into acid-conditioned dentine (PhD dissertation). Hong Kong University of Hong Kong.
- Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH (1998). Micromorphological spectrum of acid-conditioned dentin following the application of a water-based adhesive. Dent Mater 14:329-338.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Van Meerbeek B., Dhem A., Goret-Niçaise M., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. (1993). Comparative SEM and TEM examination of ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. J Dent Res 72:495-501.
- Van Meerbeek B., Conn LJ Jr, Duke ES, Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Guerrero D. (1996). Correlative transmission electron microscopy examination of nondemineralized and demineralized resin-dentin interfaces formed by two dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 75:879-888.
- Van Meerbeek B., Eick JD, Robinson SJ (1997). Epoxy-embedded versus nonembedded TEM examination of the resin-dentin interface. J Biomed Mater Res 35:191-197.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Duke ES, Eick JD, et al. (1998). A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77:50-59.
- Wang T., Nakabayashi N. (1991). Effect of 2-(methacryloxy)ethylphenyl hydrogen phosphate on adhesion to dentin. J Dent Res 70:59-66.
- Yoshiyama M., Sano H., Ebisu S., Tagami J., Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, et al. (1996). Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404-1413.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 78, No. 7,
1298-1303 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780070301
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. H. PURK, V. DUSEVICH, A. GLAROS, P. SPENCER, and J. D. EICK
In vivo versus in vitro microtensile bond strength of axial versus gingival cavity preparation walls in Class II resin-based composite restorations
J Am Dent Assoc,
February 1, 2004;
135(2):
185 - 193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
