|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
An Estimation of the Size Distribution of Amalgam Particles in Dental Treatment Waste
H. Letzel
Groesbeekseweg 223, 6523 NV Nijmegen, The Netherlands
EA de Boer
Haskoning, Royal Dutch Consulting Engineers and Architects, Nijmegen
M.A. Van T Hof
Department of Medical Statistics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Regulations have been adopted in several countries of the European Union which prescribe that dental treatment waste water must be discharged via an amalgam separator device. Since the effectivity of the device strongly depends on the size of the amalgam waste particles, this size was evaluated in waste water samples from eight dental offices. Per sample, all solid particles were separated from the waste water by pressure filtration, then dried and divided into six fractions by being sieved over five sieves with decreasing mesh width. Of the particles in each fraction, the density was determined by picnometry, the mass by weighing, and the area and width by image analysis. For this analysis, width was defined as the dimension perpendicular to the length of the particles. By combining the density, area, and width determinations of all fractions, we obtained mass distributions per waste particle width of the samples. The proportional amalgam mass of the distributions was estimated with the measured density of the particle fractions and with a number of assumptions for the density of amalgam particles only and of other waste particles only. Each waste sample has its own characteristics with respect to the mass and density of the particle fractions. The size distribution of waste particles has a bimodal shape and consists of a distribution of small (width, 2 to 90 pm) and large particles (width, 160 to 5500 µm). For small particles with a width up to 60 µm, the influence of the assumptions on the estimation of the proportion amalgam of the waste mass distribution is minor when compared with the sampling error. By averaging the estimations over the samples, one can estimate the weight of amalgam particles with a width < 10 µm and < 50 µm, respectively, between 4 and 15% and between 15 and 30%. The smallest particles comprising 5% of the amalgam mass have an estimated width of up to 5 to 15 pm.
Key Words: dental amalgam mercury treatment waste particle size distribution image analysis.
REFERENCES
- Arenholt-Bindslev D. (1992). Dental amalgam-Environmental aspects. Adv Dent Res 6:125-130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Arenholt-Bindslev D., Larsen A. (1991). Mercury levels in waste water from dental clinics (abstract). J Dent Res 70:837.
- Batchu H., Stone M., Naleway CA, Meyer D. (1995). Comparison of particle size distributions of dental waste water under various clinical procedures (abstract). J Dent Res 74:149.
- Bengel W. (1990). Amalgam-Werkstoff und Klinik (Amalgam-Material and Clinical). Die Quintessenz 20:1129-1144.
- Boyer DB, Edie JW ( 1990). Composition of clinically aged amalgam restorations. Dent Mater 6:146-150.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bundesministerium fur Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reactorsicherheit (1989). Allgemeine Rahmen-Verwaltungsvorschrift über Mindestanforderungen an das Einleiten von Abwasser in Gewässer-Rahmen-Abwasser VwV-Vom 8. September, 1989. Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt 40:517-527.
- Cavex Holland B.V. (1993). Technische gegevens van Cavex amalgaam legeringen. Haarlem, The Netherlands: Cavex Holland B.V.
- European Economic Community (1984). Council directive of 8 March 1984 on limit values and quality objectives for mercury discharges by sectors other than the chlor-alkali electrolysis industry. Off J European Communities No. L 74,17-3-84:49-54.
- Gavis J., Ferguson JF (1972). The cycling of mercury through the environment. Water Res 6:989-1008.
- Goldwater LJ (1971). Mercury in the environment. Scientif Am 224:15-21.
- Ingenieurbüro fur Grundbau, Bodenmechanik und Umwelttechnik (1993). Korngrössenuntersuchungen an Rückständen aus Amalgamabscheidern. Hamburg, Germany: Ingenieurbiiro fur Grundbau, Bodenmechanik und Umwelttechnik.
- Jensen S., Jernelöv A. (1969). Biologic methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms. Nature 223:753-754.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Letzel H., Plooy P., Jonkman Reg, Goud R. ( 1989). The efficiency of 4 amalgam separators (abstract). J Dent Res 68:611.
- Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Letzel H., Vrijhoef MM (1987). Microstructures of Cu-rich amalgam restorations with moderate clinical deterioration. Dent Mater 3:135-143.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Letzel H. (1989). Mercury content of amalgam restorations. Gen Dent 37:473-477.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Marshall GW Jr, McCoy DD, Kinney JH, Letzel H., Marshall SJ (1992). Microstructural changes in retrieved amalgam restorations. Cells and Mater 2:29-36.
- Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat (1994 ). Besluit van 24 november 1994, houdende regels voor het lozen van amalgaam en fotografische vloeistoffen vanuit tandartspraktijken (Lozingenbesluit Wvo tandartspraktijken). Staatsblad (818):1-21.
- Quantimet 500 (computer program) (1992). MS Windows version. Cambridge, UK: Leica Cambridge Ltd.
- Naleway CA, Ovsey V., Mihailova C., Chou H., Fan PL, Whitlock R., et al. (1994). Characteristics of amalgam in dental waste water (abstract). J Dent Res 73:105.
- Nederlands Normalisatie-instituut (1981). NEN 6449: Water; determination of total mercury content by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry; digestion with permanganate and persulphate. Delft, The Netherlands: Nederlands Normalisatie-instituut.
- Rijkswaterstaat (1990). CUWVO Werkgroep VI, Afvalwaterproblematiek in de tandheelkundige verzorging. The Hague, The Netherlands: Rijkswaterstaat.
- Russ JC ( 1990). Computer-assisted microscopy, The measurement and analysis of images. New York: Plenum Press.
- Sarkar NK, Park JR ( 1988). Mechanism of improved corrosion resistance of Zn-containing dental amalgams. J Dent Res 76:1312-1315.
- Weast RC (1989). Handbook of chemistry and physics. 70th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 76, No. 3,
780-788 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345970760031101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Batchu, D. Rakowski, P.L. Fan, and D. M. Meyer
Evaluating amalgam separators using an international standard.
J Am Dent Assoc,
July 1, 2006;
137(7):
999 - 1005.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. MCMANUS and P.L. FAN
Purchasing, installing and operating dental amalgam separators: Practical issues
J Am Dent Assoc,
August 1, 2003;
134(8):
1054 - 1065.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.L. FAN, H. BATCHU, H.-N. CHOU, W. GASPARAC, J. SANDRIK, and D. M. MEYER
Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators
J Am Dent Assoc,
May 1, 2002;
133(5):
577 - 589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|