|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Morphometry of the Cranial Base in Subjects with Class III Malocclusion
G.D. Singh
Department of Dental Surgery & Periodontology, Dundee Dental Hospital & School, University of Dundee, Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HR, Scotland, UK
J.A. McNamara, Jr
Department of Orthodontics & Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1078, USA
S. Lozanoff
Departments of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology and of Surgery, John A. Bums School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96882
The significance of the cranial base in the development of Class III malocclusion remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the form of the cranial base differs between prepubertal Class I and Class III subjects. Lateral cephalographs of 73 children of European-American descent aged between 5 and 11 years with Class III malocclusion were compared with those of their counterparts with a normal, Class I molar occlusion. The cephalographs were traced, checked, and subdivided into seven age- and sex-matched groups. Average geometries, scaled to an equivalent size, were generated based on 13 craniofacial landmarks by means of Procrustes analysis, and these configurations were statistically tested for equivalence. Bivariate and multivariate analyses utilizing 5 linear and angular measurements were undertaken to corroborate the Procrustes analysis. Graphical analysis, utilizing thin-plate spline and finite element methods, was performed for localization of differences in cranial base morphology. Results indicated that cranial base morphology differed statistically for all age-wise comparisons. Graphical analysis revealed that the greatest differences in morphology occurred in the posterior cranial base region, which generally consisted of horizontal compression, vertical expansion, and size contraction. The sphenoidal region displayed expansion, while the anterior regions showed shearing and local increases in size. It is concluded that the shape of the cranial base differs in subjects with Class III malocclusion compared with the normal Class I configuration, due in part to deficient orthocephalization, or failure of the cranial base to flatten during development.
Key Words: Class III cranial base morphometry orthocephalization.
REFERENCES
- Anderson D., Popovich F. (1983). Relation of cranial base flexure to cranial form and madibular position. Am J Phys Anthropol 61:181-188.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Battagel JM (1993). The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod 20:283-295.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Battagel JM (1994). Predictors of relapse in orthodonticallytreated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod 21:1-13.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bjork A. (1955). Cranial base development. Am J Orthod 41:198-255.[CrossRef]
- Bookstein FL (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Burdi AR (1969). Cephalometric growth analysis of the human upper face region during the last two trimesters of gestation. Am J Anat 125:133-142.
- Burdi AR, Lawton TJ, Grosslight J. (1988). Prenatal pattern emergence in early human facial development. Cleft Palate J 25:8-15.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cole SC ( 1988). Natural head position, posture and prognathism. Br J Orthod 15:227-239.[Abstract]
- Dietrich UC (1970). Morphological variability of skeletal Class III relationships as revealed by cephalometric analysis. Trans Eur Orthodont Soc 131-143.
- Diewert VM (1983). A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses. Am J Anat 167:495-522.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Diewert VM (1985). Growth movements during prenatal development of human facial morphology. In: Normal and abnormal bone growth, progress in basic and clinical research. Dixon AD, Sarnat BG, editors. New York: Alan R. Liss, 187:57-66.
- Ellis E., McNamara JA Jr (1984). Components of adult Class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:295-305.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Enlow DH, Moyers RE, Hunter WS, NcNamara JA Jr (1969). A procedure for the analysis of intrinsic facial form and growth. Am J Orthod 56:6-23.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ford Ehr (1956). The growth of the foetal skull. J Anat 90:63-72.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Foster TD, Day AJ (1974). A survey of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in a Shropshire school population. Br J Orthod 1:73-78.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- George SL (1978). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of growth of the postnatal cranial base angle. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:171-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gower JC (1975). Generalized Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33-51.[CrossRef]
- Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG (1986). Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 56:7-30.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haynes S. (1970). The prevalence of malocclusion in English children aged 11-12 years. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 89-98.
- Hopkin GB, Houston WJ, James GA (1968). The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod 38:250-255.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hoyte DA (1975). A critical analysis of the growth in length of the cranial base. In: Morphogenesis and malformations of the face and brain. Bergsma D, editor. Birth defects: Orig Art Ser 11. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 255-282.
- Hoyte DA (1991). The cranial base in normal and abnormal skull growth. Neurosurg Clin North Am 2:515-537.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jacobson A., Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL (1974). Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 66:140-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kerr Wjs (1978). A method of superimposing serial lateral cephalometric films for the purpose of comparison: A preliminary report. Br J Orthod 5:51-53.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kerr WJ, Adams CP (1988). Cranial base and jaw relationship. Am J Phys Anthropol 77:213-220.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lang J. ( 1983). Clinical anatomy of the head. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Lele S. ( 1993). Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean difference. Math Geol 25:573-602.[CrossRef]
- Lestrel P., Roche AF (1986). Cranial base shape variation with age: A longitudinal study of shape using Fourier analysis. Hum Biol 58:527-540.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lestrel P., Bodt A., Swindler DR (1993). Longitudinal study of cranial base shape changes in Macaca nemestrina. Am J Phys Anthropol 91:117-129.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lewis AB, Roche AF (1977). The saddle angle: Constancy or change? Angle Orthod 47:46-54.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lozanoff S., Diewert VM (1986). Measuring histological form change with finite element methods. Am J Anat 177:187-201.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lozanoff S., Diewert VM (1989). A computer graphics program for measuring two and three-dimensional form change in developing craniofacial cartilages using finite elements. Comp Biomed Res 22:63-82.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lozanoff S., Jureczek S., Feng T., Padwal R. (1994). Anterior cranial base morphology in mice with midfacial retrusion. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 31:417-428.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ma W., Lozanoff S. (1996). Morphological deficiency in the prenatal anterior cranial base of midfacially retrognathic mice. J Anat (in press).
- Melsen B. (1972). Time and mode of closure of the sphenooccipital synchondrosis determined on human autopsy material. Acta Anat 83:112-118.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Melsen B. (1974). The cranial base. Acta Odontol Scand 32:62-73.
- Ohtsuki F., Mukherjee D., Lewis AB, Roche AF (1982). A factor analysis of cranial base and vault dimensions in children. Am J Phys Anthropol 58:271-279.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Read DW, Lestrel PE (1986). Comment on uses of homologous-point measures in systematics: A reply to Bookstein et al. Syst Zool 35:241-253.[Free Full Text]
- Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Lele S. ( 1992). Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol 21:283-305.
- Rohlf FJ (1996). Appendix II: Morphometric resources available on the Internet. In: Advances in morphometrics. Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE, editors. NATO ASI Series A. New York: Life Sciences 284, pp. 553-560.
- Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF (1993). A revolution in morphometrics. TREE 8:129-132.
- Rohlf FJ, Slice D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39:40-59.[Abstract]
- Sanborn RT (1955). Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 25:208-222.
- Sato S. ( 1994). Case report: Developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 64:105-112.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scott JH (1958). The cranial base. Am J Phys Anthropol 16:319-348.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scott JH (1967). Dento-facial development and growth. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
- Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981). Biometry. New York: W.H. Freeman Co.
- Solow B., Tallgren A. (1976). Head posture and craniofacial morphology. Am J Phys Anthropol 44:417-435.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stapf WC (1948). A cephalometric roentgenographic appraisal of the facial pattern in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 18:20-23.
- Varjanne I., Koski K. (1982). Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. Proc Finn Dent Soc 78:179-183.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Williams S., Andersen CE (1986). The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod 89:302-311.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 76, No. 2,
694-703 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345970760021101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Mossey, G D Singh, and M E Smith
More extensive analysis is needed when assessing facial structure in SIDS
BMJ,
February 6, 1999;
318(7180):
396a - 396.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Saunders, M. A. Birchall, S. J. Armstrong, N. Killingback, and G. D. Singh
Morphometry of Paranasal Sinus Anatomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Pilot Study
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,
June 1, 1998;
124(6):
656 - 658.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|