|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Trial Production of Titanium Orthodontic Brackets Fabricated by Metal Injection Molding (MIM) with Sintering
T. Deguchi
Department of Orthodontics, materials, Institute of Dental Science, Matsumoto Dental College, 1780 Gohbara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-07, Japan
M. Ito
Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Dental Science, Matsumoto Dental College, 1780 Gohbara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-07, Japan
A. Obata
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dental Science, Matsumoto Dental College, 1780 Gohbara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-07, Japan
Y. Koh
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Dental Science, Matsumoto Dental College, 1780 Gohbara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-07, Japan
T. Yamagishi
Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Dental Science, Matsumoto Dental College, 1780 Gohbara Hirooka, Shiojiri, Nagano 399-07, Japan
Y. Oshida
Dental Materials, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA
Safety and esthetics are two indispensable factors to consider when fabricating orthodontic brackets. However, these factors are not easily achieved when conventional techniques (including forging and casting) are used in the mass production of titanium brackets, albeit the brackets exhibit excellent biocompatibility. In the present study, orthodontic brackets were manufactured by metal powder injection molding with sintering. Brackets with three different base designs were made and subjected to compression shear tests for evaluation of their bonding strength to enamel substrate. The shapes given to the dimple of the base were spherical, oval, and grooved. The maximum shear forces for each type were 11.1 kgf, 7.6 kgf, and 18.5 kgf, respectively. The bonding strengths of the titanium bracket were equivalent to those obtained with conventional stainless steel brackets. Moreover, uniform distribution of Vickers hardness values (average, 240 ± 40 Hv) measured at three locations indicated that the titanium bracket was uniformly sintered. Accordingly, titanium brackets thus fabricated exhibit a potential for clinical application.
Key Words: metal injection molding titanium orthodontic bracket bonding strength Vickers hardness
REFERENCES
- Aird JC, Durning P. (1987). Fracture of polycarbonate edgewise brackets: A clinical and SEM study. Br J Orthod 14:191-195.[Abstract]
- Akin-Nergiz N., Nergiz I., Platzer U., Behlfelt K. (1995). Schetfesti von Titanbrackets in Abhangigkeit vom Beschichtungsverfahren. [The shearing strength of titanium brackets depending on the coating procedure.] Fortschr Kieferorthop 56:49-55.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bass JK, Fine H, Cisneros GJ (1993). Nickel hypersensitivity in the orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 103:280-285. Billiet R (1985). Net-shape full density p/m parts by injection molding. Int J Powd Metall Powd Technol 21:119-129.
- Birnie D. (1990). Ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod 17:71-74.[Abstract]
- Dunlap CL, Vincent SK, Baker BF (1989). Allergic reaction to orthodontic wire: Report of case. J Am Dent Assoc 118:449-450.[Abstract]
- Erickson AR, Amaya HE (1984). Recent development in injection molding of p/m parts. In: Modern developments in powder metallurgy. Aqua EN, Whitman CI, editors. Princeton, NJ: American Powder Metallurgy Institute, pp. 145-155.
- Franklin S., Garcia-Godoy F. (1993). Shear bond strengths and effects on enamel of two ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 27:83-88.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gomi K. ( 1994). On MIM technology. Plastic Forming Technology 9:42-45.
- Grimsdottir MR, Gjerdet NR, Hensten-Pettersen A. (1992). Composition and in vitro corrosion of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:525-532.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kiyota Y., Ohtsubo H. (1990). Sintering behaviors and magnetic properties of metal injection molded Fe-Co alloys. Powd and Powd Metallurgy 37:9-12.
- Mimura H., Deguchi T., Obata A., Yamagishi T., Ito M. (1995). Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding. Am J Orthod Dentfac Orthop 108:267-273.
- Staerkjaer L., Menne T. (1990). Nickel allergy and orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 12:284-289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Swartz ML (1988). Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 22:82-88.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Tanaka N. (1993). Current status of metal injection molding. Nikko-Forum 14:1-7.
- Todd DJ, Burrows D. (1989). Nickel allergy in relationship to previous oral andcutaneous nickel contact. Ulster Med J 58:168-171.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Viazis AD, Delong R., Bevis RR, Rudney JD, Pintado MR (1990). Enamel abrasion from ceramic orthodontic brackets under an artificial oral environment. Am J Orthod Dentfac Orthop 98:103-109.
- Wei TS, German RM (1988). Injection molded tungsten heavy alloy. Int J Powd Metallurgy 24:327-335.
- Yamagishi T., Ito M., Kou Y., Obata A., Deguchi T., Hayashi S., et al. (1995). Mechanical properties of sintered titanium using metal injection molding. J Jpn Soc Dent Mater Devices 14:1-7.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 75, No. 7,
1491-1496 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750070901

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|