Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Anusavice, K.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Anusavice, K.J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Flaw Size and Auto-glaze Treatment on Porcelain Strength

J.A. Griggs

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Box 100446, JHMHSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0446

J.Y. Thompson

presently at Department of Operative Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7450

K.J. Anusavice

Department of Dental Biomaterials, Box 100446, JHMHSC, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0446

The functional surfaces of porcelain restorations are often ground to adjust occlusion. This removes the surface glaze and introduces flaws. Re-firing the restoration before final placement produces a self-glaze layer on the surface that may reduce the extent of damage caused by grinding. The objectives of this study were to determine whether re-firing after grinding increases the strength of dental porcelain and to determine whether the effectiveness of this treatment was dependent on the initial flaw size. Six groups, each containing 12 disk specimens, were prepared from experimental body porcelain (No. 36, J.F. Jelenko & Co., Armonk, NY). The specimens were fired under vacuum, ground to a thickness of 1 mm with 240-grit SiC abrasive, and polished through 600-grit on the surface to be subjected to tensile stress. Control Group A consisted of 12 non-indented specimens. Flaws were induced in the remaining groups by means of a Vickers indenter under the following loads: 3.9 N (Group B), 7.8 N (Group C), 11.8 N (Group D), 15.7 N (Group E), and 19.6 N (Group F). Following indentation, half of the specimens from each group were re-fired. The flexure strength of each specimen was determined by means of a piston-on-three-ball biaxial fixture. The TTEST procedure of SAS (1985) indicated a significant difference between the mean strength values of glazed and non-glazed specimens in Group E only (p = 0.55, 0.24, 0.13, 0.07, 0.01, and 0.69 for Groups A to F, respectively). ANOVA with the GLM procedure of SAS (1985) revealed that the mean strength values of groups subjected to five indentation loads were not significantly different (p = 0.45 for glazed specimens and p = 1.00 for non-glazed specimens). These findings support those of Fairhurst et al. (1992) for specimens with smaller flaws that were induced by grinding with 1 um abrasive grit. The results of the current study indicate that re-firing of porcelain with large surface flaws does not significantly increase the flexural strength.

Key Words: porcelain • failure • strength • glaze

REFERENCES

  • Binns DB (1983). The chemical and physical properties of dental porcelain. In: Dental ceramics, proceedings of the first international symposium on ceramics. McLean JW, editor. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 41-82.
  • Cook RF, Lawn BR, Dabbs TP, Chantikul P. (1981). Effect of machining damage on the strength of a glass-ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc 64:C121-C122.
  • Davidge RW, Green TJ (1968). The strength of two-phase ceramic/glass materials. J Mater Sci 3:629-634.
  • Fairhurst CW, Anusavice KJ, Hashinger DT, Ringle RD, Twiggs SW (1980). Thermal expansion of dental alloys and porcelains. J Biomed Mater Res 14:435-446.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Thompson WO (1992). The effect of glaze on porcelain strength. Dent Mater 8:203-207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Giordano R., Cima M., Pober R. (1995). Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 8:311-319.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kazuyuki H., Tomozawa M. (1987). Dynamic fatigue of treated high-silica glass: explanation by crack tip blunting. J Am Ceram Soc 70:377-382.
  • Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR (1976). Introduction to ceramics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Mackert JR Jr, Evans AL (1991). Effect of cooling rate on leucite volume fraction in dental porcelains. J Dent Res 70:137-139.
  • Mackert JR Jr, Rueggeberg FA, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Thompson WO (1994). Isothermal anneal effect on microcrack density around leucite particles in dental porcelain. J Dent Res 73:1221-1227.
  • Marshall DB (1980). An improved biaxial flexure test for ceramics. Am Ceram Soc Bull 59:551-553.
  • Mecholsky JJ, Freiman SW, Rice RW ( 1978). Fractographic analysis of ceramics. In: Fractography in failure analysis, ASTM STP 645. Strauss BM, Cullen WH, editors. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 363-379.
  • SAS Institute (1985). SAS user's guide: statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  • Wachtman JB Jr, Capps W., Mandel J. (1972). Biaxial flexure tests of ceramic substrates. J Mater 7:188-194.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 75, No. 6, 1414-1417 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750061301


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
B. Kukiattrakoon and B. Samruajbenjakul
Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2009; (2009) cjp055v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Anusavice, K.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griggs, J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Anusavice, K.J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?