|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Jaw Muscle Orientation and Moment Arms of Long-face and Normal Adults
P.H. van Spronsen
Department of Orthodontics, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
W.A. Weijs
Department of Functional Anatomy, ACTA, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
EC van Ginkel
Department of Orthodontics, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
B. Prahl-Andersen
Department of Orthodontics, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)
Long-face subjects have strongly reduced bite forces relative to normal subjects. This difference cannot be fully explained by the reduced cross-sectional area of the jaw muscles. In this study, we investigated whether the orientation and moment arms of the jaw muscles of normal and long-face subjects are different, and if so, to what extent these differences contribute to the observed differences in maximum molar bite-force levels. Three MRI scan series with different orientations were made of the jaw muscles of 30 normal and 13 long-face subjects. These served as the basis for computer reconstructions of the external shape of the muscles. The spatial orientation of the jaw muscles was defined by the regression line through the centroids of the muscular cross-sections. The moment arms of the jaw muscles and the bite point of the first mandibular molar were measured with respect to the center of the ipsilateral condyle. The muscular variables-including angles, moment arms, and mechanical advantage-were analyzed with a discriminant analysis and a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Differences in the spatial orientation of the temporalis muscle and the anterior digastric muscle contributed most to the distinction of the normal and long-face group. With MANOVA, it was shown that the normal and long-face group did not significantly differ with respect to the jaw muscle moment arms and mechanical advantage data. Only small differences were found between the sagittal muscle angles of the masseter and anterior digastric muscles in the two groups. In both the normal and long-face group, the orientation and moment arm data of the right and left muscles differed significantly. It was concluded that the variation of the spatial orientation of the jaw muscles is small and does not significantly contribute to the explanation of the different molar bite-force levels of long-face and normal subjects. Therefore, it is tempting to assume that the jaw muscles of normal and long-face subjects are different with respect to the maximum force they can exert per unit of cross-sectional area.
Key Words: jaw muscle orientation vertical craniofacial morphology MRI
REFERENCES
- Ahlgren J. (1966). Mechanism of mastication. Acta Odontol Scand 24(Suppl 44):1-109.
- Boyd SB, Gonyea WJ, Finn RA, Woodard CE, Bell WH ( 1984). Histochemical study of the masseter muscle in patients with vertical maxillary excess. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:75-83.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Epker BN, O'Ryan F. (1982). Determinants of Cl II dentofacial morphology: A biomechanical theory. In: The effect of surgical intervention on craniofacial growth. McNamara JA, editor. Monograph 12, Craniofacial Growth Series, Center for Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan.
- Finn RA ( 1978). Relationship of vertical maxillary dysplasias, bite force, and integrated EMG. In: Abstracts of conference on craniofacial research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Center for Human Growth and Development.
- Finn RA, Throckmorton GS, Gonyea WJ (1980). Neuromuscular aspects of vertical maxillary dysplasias. In: Surgical correction of dentofacial deformities. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, pp. 1712-1730.
- Hagberg C. (1987). Assessments of bite force, a review. J Craniomandib Disord Fac Oral Pain 1:162-169.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hannam AG, Wood WW ( 1989). Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton and jaw biomechanics. Am J Phys Anthropol 80:429-445.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haskell B., Day M., Tetz J. ( 1986). Computer-aided modeling in the assessment of the biomechanical determinants of diverse skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod 89:363-382.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ingervall B. (1974). Relation between height of the articular tubercle of the temporomandibular joint and facial morphology. Angle Orthod 44:15-24.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ingervall B., Thilander B. (1974). Relation between facial morphology and activity of the masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1:131-147.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koolstra JH, van Eijden Tmgj, Weijs WA (1988a). Three-dimensional performance of the human masticatory system: the influence of the orientation and physiological cross-section of the masticatory muscles. In: International series on biomechanics. 7-A. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Free University Press, pp. 101-106.
- Koolstra JH, van Eijden Tmgj, Weijs WA, Naeije M. (1988b). A three-dimensional mathematical model of the human masticatory system predicting maximum possible biteforces. J Biomechan 21:563-576.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koolstra JH, van Eijden Tmgj, van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J. ( 1990). Computer assisted estimation of lines of action of human masticatory muscles reconstructed in vivo by means of magnetic resonance imaging of parallel sections. Arch Oral Biol 35:549-556.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Leonard L. (1984). Histochemical characteristics of the masseter and medial pterygoid muscles and craniofacial form (dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Department of Orthodontics.
- Linden RWA (1990). Periodontal mechanoreceptors and their functions. In: Neurophysiology of the jaws and teeth. Taylor A, editor. London: The MacMillan Press LTD, pp. 52-95.
- Moller E. (1966). The chewing apparatus. Acta Physiol Scand 69(280 Suppl):1-229.[CrossRef]
- Moller E., Bakke M. (1988). Occlusal harmony and disharmony: Frauds in clinical dentistry. Int Dent J 38:7-18.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Norusis MJ (1985). Balancing on beams, multivariate analysis of variance. In: SPPS®, advanced statistics guide. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Chapter 6.
- Proctor AD, DeVincenzo JP (1970). Masseter muscle position relative to dentofacial form. Angle Orthod 40:37-44.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Proffit W., Fields HW (1983). Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face children. J Dent Res 62:571-574.
- Proffit W., Fields HW, Nixon WL (1983). Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face adults. J Dent Res 62:566-571.
- Ricketts RM (1950). Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminography. Am J Orthod 36:877-898.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Alway S., Sutton JR (1987). Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male body builders. J Appl Physiol 62:1786-1793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sasaki K., Hannam AG, Wood WW ( 1989). Relationships between the size, position, and angulation of human jaw muscles and unilateral first molar bite force. J Dent Res 68:499-503.
- Sassouni V. (1969). A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 55:109-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sassouni V., Nanda S. (1964). Analysis of dentofacial vertical proportions. Am J Orthod 50:801-823.[CrossRef]
- Schendel SA, Eisenveld J., Bell WH ( 1976). The long-face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod 70:398-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shaughnessy T., Fields HW, Westbury J. (1989). Association between craniofacial morphology and fiber-type distributions in human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 4:145-155.
- Takada K., Lowe AA, Freund VK (1984). Canonical correlations between masticatory muscle orientation and dentoskeletal morphology in children. Am J Orthod 86:331-341.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Throckmorton GS (1985). Quantitative calculations of temporomandibular joint reaction forces-II. The importance of the direction of the jaw muscle forces. J Biomechan 18:453-461.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Throckmorton GS, Throckmorton LS (1985). Quantitative calculations of temporomandibular joint reaction forces-I. The importance of the magnitude of the jaw muscle forces. J Biomechan 18:445-452.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Throckmorton GS, Finn RA, Bell WH ( 1980). Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. Am J Orthod 77:410-420.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- van Eijden Tmgj, Brugman P., Weijs WA, Oosting J. (1990). Co-activation of jaw muscles: recruitment order and level as a function of bite force direction and magnitude. J Biomechan 23:475-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- van Spronsen PH, Valk J., Weijs WA, Prahl-Andersen B. (1987). Analysis of masticatory muscle orientation in adults by means of MRI. Acta Anat 130:96-97.
- van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Prahl-Andersen B., Valk J., van Ginkel FC (1989). Comparison of jaw muscle bite force cross-sections obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging and high resolution CT-scanning. J Dent Res 68:1765-1770.
- van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Prahl-Andersen B., Valk J., van Ginkel FC (1991). Relationships between jaw muscle cross-sections and craniofacial morphology in normal adults, studied with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 13:351-361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Valk J., Prahl-Andersen B., van Ginkel FC (1992). A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 71:1279-1285.
- van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Koolstra JH, Valk J., Prahl-Andersen B., van Ginkel FC (1996). Relationships between the orientation and moment arms of the human jaw muscles and normal craniofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod (accepted for publication).
- Weijs WA, Hillen B. (1984). Relationship between the physiological cross-section of the human jaw muscles and their cross-sectional area in computer tomograms. Acta Anat 118:129-138.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Weijs WA, Hillen B. (1985). Physiological cross-section of the human jaw muscles. Acta Anat 121:31-35.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Weijs WA, van Spronsen (1992). Variation in adult human jaw muscle size: computer models predicting the biomechanical consequences of this variation. In: The biological mechanisms of tooth movement and craniofacial adaptation. Davidovitch Z, editor. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, College of Dentistry, pp. 549-557.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 75, No. 6,
1372-1380 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750060801

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. W. Kusumah, S. Suzuki, K. Itoh, R. Higashino, N. Ohbayashi, T. Kurabayashi, and K. Moriyama
Morphological observation of the medial pterygoid muscle by the superimposition of images obtained by lateral cephalogram and MRI
J. Orthod.,
October 1, 2009;
36(4):
243 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Pereira, M. B. D. Gaviao, L. R. Bonjardim, P. M. Castelo, and A. van der Bilt
Muscle thickness, bite force, and craniofacial dimensions in adolescents with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction
Eur J Orthod,
February 1, 2007;
29(1):
72 - 78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Gonzalez, I. Montoya, and J. Carcel
Review: the Use of Electromyography on Food Texture Assessment
Food Science and Technology International,
December 1, 2001;
7(6):
461 - 471.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.C. Raadsheer, T.M.G.J. van Eijden, F.C. van Ginkel, and B. Prahl-Andersen
Contribution of Jaw Muscle Size and Craniofacial Morphology to Human Bite Force Magnitude
Journal of Dental Research,
January 1, 1999;
78(1):
31 - 42.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|