|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Marginal Ditching and Staining as a Predictor of Secondary Caries Around Amalgam Restorations: A Clinical and Microbiological Study
E.A.M. Kidd
Department of Conservative Dental Surgery, United Medical and Dental School, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT, England
S. Joyston-Bechal
Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, London Hospital Medical College, Turner Street, Whitechapel, London El 2AD, England
D. Beighton
Oral Microbiology, Royal College of Surgeons, Department of Dental Sciences, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8RW, England
Caries at the margins of restorations is difficult to diagnose. In particular, the relevance of both marginal ditching and staining around amalgam restorations is unclear. This clinical study questions the relevance of marginal ditching and color change to the level of infection of the dentin beneath the margins of amalgam restorations. Clinically visible sites (330) on the tooth/restoration margin were selected on 175 teeth. The enamel adjacent to each site was noted as stained (a grey discoloration) or stain-free. One hundred and seventy-eight sites were clinically intact, 83 sites had narrow ditches (< 0.4 mm), and at 49 sites, wide ditches were present (> 0.4 mm). Twenty sites with frankly carious lesions were also included. Plaque was sampled at the tooth-restoration margin, and the dentin was sampled at the enamel-dentin junction below each site. Samples were vortexed, diluted, and cultured for total anaerobic counts, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, and yeasts. Plaque samples showed that margins with wide ditches (> 0.4 mm) harbored significantly more bacteria, mutans streptococci, and lactobacilli than did clinically intact margins and margins with narrow ditches. There were no significant differences in the degree of infection of the dentin beneath clinically intact restorations and those with narrow ditches, but samples associated with wide ditches and carious lesions yielded significantly more bacteria, mutans streptococci, and lactobacilli. The color of the enamel adjacent to the sample site was irrelevant to the level of infection of the dentin beneath the filling margin, provided a frankly carious lesion was not present. The results suggest that amalgam fillings where margins show wide ditches or carious lesions should be replaced. Narrow ditches and color change alone should not trigger the replacement of a filling.
Key Words: ditching staining recurrent caries
REFERENCES
- Allander L., Birkhed D., Bratthall D. (1990). Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restoration in private practice. Swed Dent J 14:179-184.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Anderson MH, Charbeneau GT (1985). A comparison of digital and optical criteria for detecting carious dentin. J Prosthet Dent 53:643-646.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Beighton D., Hellyer PH, Lynch EJR, Heath R. (1991a). Salivary levels of mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, yeasts, and root caries prevalence in non-institutionalized elderly dental patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 19:302-307. Beighton D., Russell RRB, Whiley RA (1991b). A simple biochemical scheme for the differentiation of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Caries Res 25:174-178. Boyd MA, Richardson AS (1985). Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 51:763-766.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dahl JE, Eriksen HM (1978). Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations. Scand J Dent Res 86:404-407. Elderton RJ, Nuttall NM (1983). Variation among dentists in planning treatment. Br Dent J 154:201-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Eriksen HM, Bjertness E., Hansen BF (1986). Cross-sectional clinical study of amalgam restorations, oral health and prevalence of recurrent caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 14:15-18.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fusayama T., Terachima S. (1972). Differentiation of two layers of carious dentin by staining. J Dent Res 51:866.
- Gold OG, Jordan HV, van Houte JA (1973). A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 18:1357-1364.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hals E., Andreassen BH, Bie T. (1974). Histopathology of natural caries around silver amalgam fillings. Caries Res 8:343-358. Jorgensen KD, Wakumoto S. (1968). Occlusal amalgam fillings: Marginal defects and secondary caries. Odontol Tidskr 76:43-54.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kelsey WP, Franco SJ, Blankenau RJ, Cavel WT, Barkmeier WW
- ( 1981). Caries as a cause of restoration replacement: a clinical survey. Quint Int 9:971-974.
- Kidd EAM (1989). Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. Oper Dent 14:149-158.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S., Allan R., Howe L., Smith S. (1989). The use of a caries detector dye in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 189:132-134.
- Kidd EAM, O'Hara JW (1990). The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res 69:1275-1277.
- Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F., Mjor IA ( 1992). Secondary caries. Int Dent J 42:127-138.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S., Beighton D. (1993). Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res 27:402-408.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S., Beighton D. (1994). Diagnosis of secondary caries: a laboratory study. Br Dent J 176:135-139. Mahler DB, Terkla LG, van Eysden J., Reisbick MH (1970). Marginal fracture vs. mechanical properties of amalgam. J Dent Res 49:1452-1457.
- Maryniuk G., Brunson WD (1989). When to replace faulty-margin amalgam restorations: A pilot study. Gen Dent 37:463-467.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Merrett MCW, Elderton RJ (1984). An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and dental caries. Br Dent J 157:128-133.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mileman P., Purdell-Lewis D., van der Weele L. (1982). Variation in radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions among university teachers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 10:329-334.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mjor IA ( 1981). Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 6:49-54.
- Mjor IA ( 1985). Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent 10:88-92.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Qvist V., Thylstrup A., Mjor IA ( 1986). Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 44:343-349.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 74, No. 5,
1206-1211 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345950740051001

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. V. Gordan, E. Mondragon, R. E. Watson, C. Garvan, and I. A. Mjor
A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material: Results at eight years
J Am Dent Assoc,
May 1, 2007;
138(5):
621 - 627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Hamilton and G. Stookey
Should a dental explorer be used to probe suspected carious lesions?
J Am Dent Assoc,
November 1, 2005;
136(11):
1526 - 1532.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. A. MJOR
Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries
J Am Dent Assoc,
October 1, 2005;
136(10):
1426 - 1433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.A.M. Kidd and D. Beighton
Prediction of Secondary Caries around Tooth-colored Restorations: A Clinical and Microbiological Study
Journal of Dental Research,
December 1, 1996;
75(12):
1942 - 1946.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|