Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wassell, R.W.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, A.W.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wassell, R.W.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, A.W.G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ETHYL CARBAMATE
*MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS
*MAGNESIUM OXIDE
*SILICON DIOXIDE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Two-body Frictional Wear Test

R.W. Wassell

Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Dental School, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, England

J.E. McCabe

Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Dental School, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, England

A.W.G. Walls

Department of Restorative Dentistry, The Dental School, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4BW, England

Enamel abraders used in two-body wear tests suffer the disadvantage that standardization is difficult or impossible to obtain. The aim of this study was to test whether steatite (a ceramic material with a Vickers Hardness similar to that of enamel) could be used as a satisfactory human enamel analogue. The friction and wear characteristics of 'spherical' abraders made from these two materials against composite and amalgam specimens were therefore compared. A two-body wear test for restorative materials was devised which could be carried out in a Universal Testing Machine and which allowed for continuous monitoring of the frictional forces during wear. The results showed that steatite and enamel abraders produced similar coefficients of friction (correlation coefficient, r = 0.98). A linear relationship was found between depth (and volume) of wear and number of cycles (r = 0.98 to 0.99). Wear rate was not affected by the increase in abrader facet area. The wear rate against the steatite abrader was slightly greater than that against enamel, but the two abraders were reasonably correlated (r = 0.94). Friction and wear were correlated for the steatite abrader (P < 0.05, r = 0.88) but not the enamel abrader. The hybrid composites had a high wear rate and wore both the abraders more than did the microfilled composites or amalgam. These findings suggest that steatite is a suitable substitute for enamel in this type of test.

Key Words: Abrasion Resistance • Composites • Dental Amalgam • Dental Enamel • Wear Resistance.

REFERENCES

  • Archard JF (1953). Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24:981-988[CrossRef]
  • Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. (1975). Masticatory function-a review of the literature. (II) Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. J Oral Rehabil 2:349-361.
  • Burwell JT, Strang CD (1952). On the empirical law of adhesive wear. J Appl Phys 23:18-28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • DeVries KL, Knutson M. (1981). Friction and wear of dental polymeric composite restoratives. Polymer Sci Technol 14:459-482.
  • Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Delong R. (1985). Frictional effects between natural teeth in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1:115-119.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Freund M., Munksgaard C. (1990). Enzymatic degradation of BISGMA/TEGDMA-polymers causing decreased microhardness and greater wear in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 98:351-355.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Furey MJ (1969). Friction wear and lubrication. Ind and Eng Chem 61:12-29.
  • Kusy RP, Leinfelder KF (1977). Pattern of wear in posterior composite restorations (annotation). Dent Res 56:544.
  • Mair LH ( 1991). Effect of surface conditioning on the abrasion rate of dental composites. J Dent 19:100-106.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mazer RB, Leinfelder KF, Russell CM (1992). Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater 8:185-189.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McKinney JE (1985). Environmental damage and wear of dental composite restoratives. In: Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. VanHerle G, Smith DC, editors. Netherlands: Peter Szulc, pp. 331-347.
  • Phillips RW, Avery DR, Mehra R., Swartz ML, McCune RJ (1973). Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Three-year report. J Prosthet Dent 30:891-897.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rice SL, Wayne SF, Bailey WF, Roto M. ( 1981). Influence of variation in contact stress on the sliding-wear behaviour of a dental amalgam. Biomater 2:46-48.
  • Rootare HM, Powers JM, Craig RG (1979). Wear of composites by abrasives of varying hardness. J Dent Res 58:1097-1100.
  • Roulet JF (1988). The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalgam: a status report on posterior composites. J Dent 16:101-113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Delong R., Pintado MR (1986). The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 2:235-240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sarkar AD (1980). Friction and wear. London: Academic Press.
  • Wassell RW (1992). Composites for making dental inlays (PhD thesis). Univ. of Newcastle upon Tyne.
  • Winkler MM, Greener EH, Lautenschlager EP (1991). Non-linear in vitro wear of posterior composites with time. Dent Mater 7:258-262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 73, No. 9, 1546-1553 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345940730091001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wassell, R.W.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, A.W.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wassell, R.W.
Right arrow Articles by Walls, A.W.G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ETHYL CARBAMATE
*MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS
*MAGNESIUM OXIDE
*SILICON DIOXIDE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?