|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Analysis of the "Shear" Bond Strength of Pretreated Aged Composites Used in Some Indirect Bonding Techniques
J.Y. Shiau
7990 Hollow Mesa Court, San Diego, California 92126
S.T. Rasmussen
2401 Euclid Heights, Cleveland Heights, Ohio 44106
A.E. Phelps
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
D.H. Enlow
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
G.R. Wolf
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
Investigations of the repair of composites have shown that bond strengths can be significantly reduced at an interface involving an aged composite. Brackets placed by some indirect bonding techniques also have an interface involving an aged composite. This study investigated some of the properties of sealant-composite interfaces and parameters affecting these properties independent of other regions and interfaces found in the total enamel-sealant-composite-bracket system using a shear bond-strength test and fractographic analysis. The effects of various pretreatments of 7-day-old composite surfaces on the bond strength and contact angle of a mixed sealant on these pretreated surfaces were determined. Fractured specimens with adhesive failure closest to the point of force application had low bond strengths (17.62 MPa), which could be correlated with surface pretreatment. Preliminary tests showed that acetone pretreatment produced the most consistently strong interfaces with the fewest adhesive failures of this type. Specimens with adhesive failure only in other regions had higher bond strengths (23.41 MPa), which showed no dependence on pretreatment. There was no statistical relationship between contact angle and bond strength. The data coupled with fracture path analysis suggest that: first, the critical region for fracture analysis is that part of the adhesive interface which is closest to the point of force application; second, failure during some dental shear bond strength tests probably occurs as a consequence of tensile stress induced by a bending moment rather than by shear stress; and third, specifying bond strength as breaking load/area may he incorrect.
REFERENCES
- Bowen RL (1965). Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues; I. Method of deterimining bond strength. J Dent Res 44:690-695.[Free Full Text]
- Boyer DB (1984). Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res 63:1241-1244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Boyer DB, Torney DL (1978). The strength of multilayer and repaired composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 39:63-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Davis DM, Waters NE (1987). An investigation into the fracture behavior of a particulate-filled Bis-GMA. J Dent Res 66:1128-1133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Doukoudakis S., Doukoudakis A., Rasmussen S., Abrams BL (1985). A shear bond-strength test of a new, modified, unfilled resin. J Prosthet Dent 53:586-591.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gwinnett AJ (1988). A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthodont 93:346-348.
- Hocevar RA, Vincent HF (1988). Indirect versus direct bonding: bond strength and failure location. Am J Orthodont 94:367-371.
- Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW (1980). The tensile strength of composite repairs. J Dent 8:171-177.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McInnes PM, Wendt SL Jr, Retief DH, Weinberg R. (1990). Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. Dent Mater 6:204-207.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mizrahi E., Smith DC (1969). Direct cementation of orthodontic brackets to dental enamel: An investigation using a zinc polycarboxylate cement. Br Dent J 127:371-375.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- O'Brien WJ, Rasmussen ST (1984). A critical appraisal of dental adhesion testing. In: Mittal KL, editor. Adhesion joints, formation, characteristics, and testing. New York: Plenum Press, 298-305.
- Rasmussen ST (1978). Fracture studies of adhesion. J Dent Res 57:11-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Reisbick MH, Brodsky JF ( 1971). Strength parameters of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 26:178.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Retief DH (1974). Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil 1:265-284.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shiau JY (1989). Evaluation of double-sealant indirect bonding technique: bond strength, fracture site, marginal defects and surface treatment (thesis). Cleveland (OH): School of Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University.
- Thomas RG (1979). Indirect bonding, simplicity in action. J Clin Orthodont 13:93-105.
- Van Noort R., Noroozi S., Howard IC, Cardew G. (1989 ). A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 17:61-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 72, No. 9,
1291-1297 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720090601

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wendl, H. Droschl, and P. Muchitsch
Indirect bonding--a new transfer method
Eur J Orthod,
February 1, 2008;
30(1):
100 - 107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Della Bona and R. van Noort
Shear vs. Tensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite Bonded to Ceramic
Journal of Dental Research,
September 1, 1995;
74(9):
1591 - 1596.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|