|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Effects of Enamel Anisotropy on the Distribution of Stress in a Tooth
I.R. Spears
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom
R. Van Noort
Department of Restorative Dentistry
R.H. Crompton
Department of Human Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, United Kingdom
G.E. Cardew
Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S10 2SZ, United Kingdom
I.C. Howard
Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Sheffield, S10 2SZ, United Kingdom
Enamel is thought to have highly anisotropic stiffness characteristics, because of its prismatic structure. It is probable that the enamel is stiffer in the prism direction compared with a direction perpendicular to it. The prisms are thought to run approximately perpendicular to the enamel-dentin junction. The curvilinear anisotropy that will result can readily be modeled by TOMECH, a finite element program developed at the University of Sheffield, since curvilinearity of mechanical properties is available as an automated feature of this program. The patterns of stress due to an external load were investigated in two-dimensional abstract models, and in a model of a mandibular second premolar, for both anisotropic and isotropic enamel. Results were compared with the commercial code ANSYS and good agreement obtained. Enamel with anisotropic properties was found to have a profoundly different stress distribution under load when compared with models with isotropic enamel. For isotropic enamel, the load path is directed through the stiff enamel shell, while for anisotropic enamel, the load path is directed into the dentin, as the load path follows the stiff direction ofthe enamel prisms. Thus, if enamel is indeed anisotropic, its function differs greatly from that suggested in previous hypotheses. Enamel with anisotropic material characteristics would provide a hard-wearing protective surface-coating while simultaneously diverting the load away from this brittle, low-tensile-strength phase, thus reducing the potential for tooth fracture.
REFERENCES
- Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS (1962). Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 64:378-387.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Caldwell RC, Muntz ML, Gilmore RW, Pigman W. (1957). Micro-hardness studies of intact surface enamel. J Dent Res 36:732-738.[Free Full Text]
- Craig RG, Peyton FA (1958). Elastic and mechanical properties of human teeth. J Dent Res 37:710-718.[Free Full Text]
- Craig RG, Peyton FA, Johnson DW (1961). Compressive properties of enamel, dental cements and gold. J Dent Res 40:936-945.[Free Full Text]
- De Vree Jhp, Peters Mcrb, Plasschaert Ajm (1984). The influence of modification of cavity design on the distribution of stresses in a restored molar. J Dent Res 63:1217-1220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gilmore RS, Pollack RP, Katz JL ( 1970). Elastic properties of bovine dentine and enamel. Arch Oral Biol 15:787-796.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Granath L. Svensson A. (1991). Elastic outward bending of loaded buccal and lingual premolar walls in relation to cavity size and form. Scand J Dent Res 99:1-7.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haines DJ (1968). Physical properties of human teeth enamel and enamel sheath material under load. J Biomechan 1:117-125.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Howard IC, Van Noort R., Cardew GE, Noroozi S. (1990). The influence of enamel anisotropy on the stress distribution in teeth (abstract). J Dent Res 69:956.
- Khera SC, Goel UK, Chen Rcs, Gurusami SA (1988). A three-dimensional finite element model. Oper Dent 13:128-137.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lee WC, Eakle WS (1984). Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 52:374-380.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lees S. ( 1968). Specific acoustic impedance of enamel and dentin. Arch Oral Biol 13:1492-1500.
- Lees S., Rollins FR (1972). Anisotropy in hard dental tissues. J Biomechan 5:557-566.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Luke DA, Lucas PW (1983). The significance of cusps. J Oral Rehabil 10:197-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Morin DL, Cross M., Voller VR (1988). Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: modelling and analysis. Dent Mater 4:77-84.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ng SY, Payne PA, Cartledge NA, Ferguson Mwj (1989). Determination of ultrasonic velocity in human enamel and dentine. Arch Oral Biol 34:341-345.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pfretzschner HU (1986). Structural reinforcement and crack propagation in enamel. In: Teeth revisited: Proceedings of the VIIth international symposium of dental morphology. Paris: Memoires de Museum Nationale D'Histoire Naturelle, 133-143.
- Rasmussen ST, Patchin RE, Scott DB, Heuer AH (1976). Fracture properties of human enamel and dentine. J Dent Res 55:154-164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stanford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT (1960). Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 60:746-756.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Van Noort R., Howard IC, Cardew GE (1988). A study of the interfacial shear and tensile stresses in a restored molar tooth. J Dent 16:286-293.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Van Noort R., Howard IC, Cardew GE (1991). Why is enamel structurally anisotropic (abstract). J Dent Res70:455.
- Waters NE (1980). Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. In: Vincent JVF, Curry JD, editors. The mechanical properties of biological materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99-134.
- Williams KR, Edmundsen JT, Rees JS ( 1987). Finite element stress analysis of restored teeth. Dent Mater 3:201-206.
- Yettram AL, Wright Kwj, Pickard HM (1976). Finite element stress analysis of the crowns of normal and restored teeth. J Dent Res 55:1004-1011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 72, No. 11,
1526-1531 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720111101

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. LITONJUA, S. ANDREANA, P. J. BUSH, T. S. TOBIAS, and R. E. COHEN
Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation
J Am Dent Assoc,
July 1, 2003;
134(7):
845 - 850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I.R. Spears
A Three-dimensional Finite Element Model of Prismatic Enamel: A Re-appraisal of the Data on the Young's Modulus of Enamel
Journal of Dental Research,
October 1, 1997;
76(10):
1690 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.W.P. Korioth and A. Versluis
Modeling the Mechanical Behavior of the Jaws and Their Related Structures By Finite Element (Fe) Analysis
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine,
January 1, 1997;
8(1):
90 - 104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|