|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
An Assessment of Survival Rates and Within-patient Clustering of Failures for Endosseous Oral Implants
R.J. Weyant
Department of Public Health and Community Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, VA Medical Center, Highland Drive, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
B.A. Burt
School of Public Health, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2029
This study examined endosseous cylinder implant survival, defined as the unqualified presence of the implant in the mouth at the end of the observation period, in 598 consecutive VA patients, with a total of 2098 implants. Data were taken from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Dental Implant Registry, which has maintained longitudinal data on the survival of individual dental implants in VA patients since 1987. The maximum time of observation in any one patient was 2040 days (5.6 yr). Survival analysis by use of life-table methods was carried out on both an implant- and a patient-specific basis. Implant cases were accrued randomly, and therefore a random censoring model was used. A correlated binomial model was used for assessment of the degree of within-patient clustering of implant removals. Results showed that the implant-specific survival rate during the longest time interval (5.6 yr) was 89.9%; the patient-specific implant survival rate during the same time was 78.2%. Among implants which were removed, the mean time to removal was 292 days. The hazard function, which describes the probability of implant loss as a function of time, decreased steadily throughout the observation period. The correlated binomial model suggested a clustering of removals within patients with multiple implants (p = 0.11, p = 0.0001). The odds of having a second implant removed were 1.3 times greater if the patient had already had one implant removed.
This study suggests that when implants fail, they do so soon after placement, and the likelihood of failure decreases steadily from implantation through the first five years post-surgery. These findings also suggest the existence of systemic factors which affect the survival of all implants within a given patient and may lead to multiple implant failures. Identification of these systemic factors may lead to improvements in patient selection and increases in the success rates for oral implants. Finally, results show that pure titanium implants had better short-term survival rates, but worse long-term survival rates, when compared with implants that had some other form of surface coating.
REFERENCES
- Adell R., Lekholm U., Rockler B., Brånemark P-I (1981). A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10:387-416.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ahlqvist J., Borg K., Gunne J., Nilson H., Olsson M., Astrand P. (1990). Osseointegrated implants in edentulous jaws: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:155-163.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Albrektsson T., Dahl E., Enbom L., Engevall S., Engquist B., Eriksson AR, et al. (1988). Osseointegrated oral implants: a Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol 59:287-296.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Babbush CA, Kent JN, Misiek DJ (1986). Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:274-282.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979). Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago (IL): Rand-McNally.
- Cox JF, Zarb GA ( 1987). The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:91-99.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Department of Veterans Affairs (1989). 1987 survey of veterans, DM&S M-70-89-1. Washington (DC): US Bureau of the Census.
- Engquist B., Bergendal T., Kallus T., Linden U. (1988). A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:129-134.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jemt T., Lekholm U., Adell R. (1989). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4:211-217.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kapur KK (1987). Veterans Administration cooperative dental implant study-comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part I: methodology and comparisons between treatment groups at baseline. J Prosthet Dent 58:499-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kapur KK, Garrett NR (1988). Requirements for clinical trials. J Dent Educ 52 (Spec Iss):760-764.[Abstract]
- Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Morgenstern H. (1982). Epidemiological research: principles and quantitative methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
- Kupper LL, Haseman KJ (1978). The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 34:69-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lawless JF (1982). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Malmqvist JP, Sennerby L. (1990). Clinical report on the success of 47 consecutively placed Core-Vent implants followed from 3 months to 4 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:53-60.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McKinney RV, Steflik DE, Koth DL, Singh BB (1988). The scientific basis of dental implant therapy. J Dent Educ 52:696-705.[Abstract]
- Meskin LH, Brown JB (1988). Prevalence and patterns of tooth loss in US employed adult and senior populations. J Dent Educ 52:686-691.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Naert I., DeClerq M., Theuniers G., Schepers E. (1988). Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for edentulous mandible: a 2.5 year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:191-196.
- Patrick D., Zosky J., Lubar R., Buchs A. (1989). The longitudinal clinical efficacy of Core-Vent dental implants: a five year report. J Oral Implantol 15:95-103.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schnitman PA, Shulman LB (1979). Recommendations of the consensus conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 98:373-377.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- van Steenberghe D., Lekholm U., Bolender C., Folmer T., Henry P., Herrmann I., et al. (1990). The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:272-280.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- WorthingtonP.( 1988). Current implant usage. J Dent Educ 52 (Spec Iss):692-695.[Abstract]
- Worthington P., Bolender CL, TaylorTD (1987). The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants: Problems and complications encountered during a 4-year trial period. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2:77-84.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 72, No. 1,
2-8 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345930720010201

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|