Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krejci, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zedler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krejci, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zedler, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Contact Area Size on Enamel and Composite Wear

I. Krejci

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zürich University, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland

F. Lutz

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zürich University, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland

C. Zedler

Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zürich University, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8028 Zurich, Switzerland

The effect of contact area dimensions on the wear of composite specimens and their opposing enamel cusps was evaluated in vitro. Thirty-six standardized cylindrical composite specimens were placed into metal cavities (8 mm x 2 mm) and divided randomly into five groups. The composite used was a fine-particle hybrid and was stressed as follows: storage in 75% aqueous ethanol solution for 24 h, toothbrush/toothpaste-abrasion for 30 min, followed by 300 thermal cycles in water ranging from 5° to 55°C and simultaneous 120,000 occlusal chewing loads at a frequency of 1.7 Hz at 53 N maximum force. In group 1 (n = 12), the occlusal chewing loads were applied by palatal cusps of extracted human maxillary molars with natural morphology. In groups 2 to 5 (n = 6), the cusp tips had standardized contact area dimensions of 0.26, 0.38, 1.18, and 4.10 mm2, respectively. Wear of composite specimens and antagonistic enamel cusps (means ± SD) was assessed in µm by means of a 3-D scanner. Additionally, the contact surfaces of the restorations and of the antagonistic enamel cusps were evaluated by SEM. Increases in enamel contact areas after being loaded were measured by means of a digitizer and expressed in percent of the initial size before stress exposure. The wear of the composite specimens varied from 69.8 ± 19.9 to 9.5 ± 3.6 µm, and that of antagonistic enamel cusps from 31.3 ± 3.4 to 8.8 ± 1.5 µm. The increase in contact area varied between 27.8 and 0.1%. Composite and antagonistic enamel wore significantly (p < 0.001, ANOVA, Scheffe) less with increased contact area dimensions. The most severe disintegration of the composite was found in specimens occluding with the smallest enamel contact area. The extent of wear and the wear mechanisms were related to the chewing pressure, which in turn was governed by the contact area dimension.

REFERENCES

  • Braem M., Lambrechts P., VanDoren V., Vanherle G. (1986). In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater 2:106-113.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Burwell JT (1957/58). Survey of possible wear mechanisms. Wear 1:119-141.[CrossRef]
  • Craig RG (1989). Dental restorative materials. St. Louis (MO): C.V. Mosby Co., 65-112.
  • Dietschi D., Holz J. ( 1990). A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report. Quint Int 21:965-975.
  • Krejci I., Albertoni M., Lutz F. ( 1990b). In-vitro-testverfahren zur evaluation dentaler restaurationssysteme. 2. Zahnbürsten-/zahnpastaabrasion und chemische degradation. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1164-1168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Krejci I., Heinzmann J-L., Lutz F. ( 1990c). Verschleiss von schmelz, amalgam und ihrer schmelzantagonisten im computergesteuerten kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1285-1291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Krejci I., Lutz F. ( 1990). In-vitro-testverfahren zur evaluation dentaler restaurationen: 3. Korrelation mit in-vivo-resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445-1449.
  • Krejci I., Reich T., Lutz F., Albertoni M. (1990a). In-vitro-testverfahren zur evaluation dentaler restaurationssysteme. 1. Computergesteuerter kausimulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:953-960.
  • Lambrechts P. (1983). Basic properties of dental composites and their impact on clinical performance (thesis). Leuven (Belgium): Katholieke Universiteit.
  • Leinfelder KF (1987). Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins. Int Dent J 37:152-157.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lutz F. ( 1980): Beitrage zur entwicklung von seitenzahnkomposits (PhD thesis). Zurich (Switzerland): Zahnarztliches Institut der Universitat.
  • Lutz F., Phillips R. (1983). A classification and evaluation of composite resin systems. J Prosthet Dent 50:480-488.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McCabe JF, Ogden AR (1987). The relationship between porosity, compressive fatigue limit and wear in composite resin restorative materials. Dent Mater 3:9-12.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McKinney JE, Wu W. (1982). Relationship between subsurface damage and wear of dental restorative composites. J Dent Res 61:1083-1088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Meier C., Lutz F. ( 1979). Komposits kontra amalgam: vergleichende verschleissfestigkeitsmessungen in vivo: 1-jahres-resultate. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilk 89:203-212.
  • Meier C., Lutz F. ( 1980). Vergleichende verschleissfestigkeitsuntersuchungen in vivo zwischen amalgam und komposit: 2-jahres resultate. Dtsch Zahn rztl Z 35:489-492.
  • Olver AV, Spikes HA, Bower AF, Johnson KL (1986). The residual stress distribution in a plastically deformed model asperity. Wear 107:151-174.[CrossRef]
  • Roulet J.-F (1987). Degradation of dental polymers. Basel (Switzerland): Karger.
  • Roulet J.-F (1988a). The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalgam: a status report on posterior composites. J Dent 16:101-113.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Roulet J.-F (1988b). Werkstoffkundliche parameter und ihre auswirkung auf die klinik. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 43:887-892.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Roulet J.-F, Mettler P., Friedrick U. (1980). Studie über die abrasion von komposits im seitenzahnbereich-resultate nach 3 jahren. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 35:493-497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R., Pintado MR (1986). The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 2:235-240.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Vanherle G., Lambrechts P., Braem M. (1989). Erfahrungen mit kompositfüllungsmaterialien im seitenzahnbereich. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 44:664-668.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wilson Nhf, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA (1988). A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quint Int 19:675-681.
  • Zwicky C. (1991). In-vivo-verschleissfestigkeitsverhalten von amalgamfüllungen (thesis). Zürich (Switzerland): Zahnärztliches Institut der Universitat.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 71, No. 7, 1413-1416 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345920710071001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
I. Krejci, P. Albert, and F. Lutz
The Influence of Antagonist Standardization on Wear
Journal of Dental Research, February 1, 1999; 78(2): 713 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
I. Krejci, E. Mueller, and F. Lutz
Effects of Thermocycling and Occlusal Force on Adhesive Composite Crowns
Journal of Dental Research, June 1, 1994; 73(6): 1228 - 1232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krejci, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zedler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krejci, I.
Right arrow Articles by Zedler, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?