This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heaven, T.J. Articles by Feagin, F.F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heaven, T.J. Articles by Feagin, F.F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Dentinal Lesions

University of Alabama School of Dentistry

A.R. Firestone

University of Alabama School of Dentistry

F.F. Feagin

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, UAB Station, Birmingham, Alabama 35294

The purpose of this investigation was the comparison of the precision and accuracy of two reference ramp techniques for the quantification of radiographic density changes in teeth. Radiographs (65 kVp, 10 ma, 1 s, and intra-oral ultraspeed film) of transverse sections from extracted permanent human molars were made before and after dentinal lesions were created. Each radiograph contained the image of a tooth section and the aluminum reference ramp. Method A used the image of the ramp on both the before- and after-lesion radiographs, and method B used the image of the ramp only on the before-lesion radiograph. Three groups of lesions (0.525-mm diameter, n = 11; 0.675-mm diameter, n = 9; and the 0.525-mm holes enlarged to 0.675 mm) were measured radiographically by each technique and by direct planimetry of the lesions. Radiographic method B produced results in close agreement with the planimetric measurements. Method B differentiated (p<0.05) between groups that had a mean planimetric size difference of 0.10 mm (equivalent to a change in density difference of 0.6%). These density change measurements are in absolute units of mm of aluminum that can be compared between lesions and between samples. This technique may prove useful for the quantification of changes in mineral density of caries lesions detectable in longitudinal radiographic records.

REFERENCES

• American Dental Association (1979a): 1979 Survey of Dental Services Rendered, Bureau of Economic and Behavioral Research, Chicago: ADA, pp. 1-2.
• American Dental Association (1979b): Dental Fees Charged by General Practitioners and Selected Specialists in the United States, J Am Dent Assoc 102:675-679.
• Espelid, I. (1986): Radiographic Diagnoses and Treatment Decisions on Approximal Caries, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 14:265-270.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Grondahl, H.-G.; Grondahl, K.; and Webber, R.L. (1983): A Digital Subtraction Technique for Dental Radiography, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 55:96-102.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gwinnett, A.J. (1971): A Comparison of Proximal Carious Lesions as Seen by Clinical Radiography, Contact Microradiography, and Light Microscopy, J Am Dent Assoc 83:1078-1080.
• Heaven, T.J.; Cogen, R.B.; and Firestone, A.R. (1989): A Comparison of Two Registration Methods for Digital Subtraction Radiography, J Dent Res 68:253, Abst. No. 571.
• Hodge, H.C.; Bale, W.F.; Warren, S.L.; and Van Huysen, G. (1935): Factors Influencing the Quantitative Measurement of the Roentgen-ray Absorption of Tooth Slabs, Am J Roentgenol 34:817-838.
• Marthaler, T.M. and Germann, M. (1970): Radiographic and Visual Appearance of Small Smooth Surface Caries Lesions Studied on Extracted Teeth, Caries Res 4:224-242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Mejare, I.; Grondahl, H.-G.; Carlstedt, K.; Grever, A.-C.; and Ottosson, E. (1985): Accuracy at Radiography and Probing for the Diagnosis of Proximal Caries, Scand J Dent Res 93:178-184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Muhler, J.C.; Spear, L.B.; Bixler, D.; and Stookey, G.K. (1967): The Arrestment of Incipient Dental Caries in Adults After the Use of Three Different Forms of SnF2 Therapy: Results After 30 Months, J Am Dent Assoc 75:1402-1406.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pitts, N.B. (1983): Monitoring of Caries Progression in Permanent and Primary Posterior Approximal Enamel by Bitewing Radiography, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 11:228-235.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pitts, N.B. (1984): Detection and Measurement of Approximal Radiolucencies by Computer-aided Image Analysis, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58:358-366.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Rekola, M. (1987): Approximal Caries Development During 2-Year Total Substitution of Dietary Sucrose with Xylitol, Caries Res 21:87-94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ruttimann, U.E.; Webber, R.L.; and Saffer, A. (1986a): Calibrated Volume Determination of Localized Bone Lesions by Subtraction Radiography: In: Medinfo 86, R. Salamon, B. Blum, and M. Jørgensen, Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 634-637.
• Ruttimann, U.E.; Webber, R.L.; and Schmidt, E. (1986b): A Robust Digital Method for Film Contrast Correction in Subtraction Radiography, J Periodont Res 21:486-495.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• SAS Institute, Inc. (1985): The GLM Procedure. In: SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., pp. 433-506.
• Shepherd, P.R. (1945): The Estimation of the Rate of Spread of Dental Caries, Br Dent J 78:73-75.
• Shwartz, M.; Pliskin, J.S.; Grondahl, H.-G.; and Boffa, J. (1987): Benefits of Alternative Schedules for Bitewing Radiographs, NCHSR Research Summary Series, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 87-3407.
• Vos, M.H.; Janssen, P.T.; Van Aken, J.; and Heethaar, R.M. (1986): Quantitative Measurement of Periodontal Bone Changes by Digital Subtraction, J Periodont Res 21:583-591.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Webber, R.L.; Tzukert, A.; and Ruttimann, U. (1989): The Effects of Beam Hardening on Digital Subtraction Radiography, J Periodont Res 24:53-58.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 69, No. 1, 51-54 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690010801


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. GAKENHEIMER The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2002; 133(7): 883 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.A.M. Exterkate, J.J.M. Damen, and J.M. Ten Cate A Single-section Model for Enamel De- and Remineralization Studies. 1. The Effects of Different Ca/P Ratios in Remineralization Solutions Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 1993; 72(12): 1599 - 1603. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heaven, T.J. Articles by Feagin, F.F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heaven, T.J. Articles by Feagin, F.F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?