Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banting, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banting, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Adjustment of Frequently Used Chi-square Procedures for the Effect of Site-to-Site Dependencies in the Analysis of Dental Data

A. Donner

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1

D. Banting

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1

Donner and Banting (1988) presented a method of adjusting the standard chi-square test for the comparison of proportions when this procedure is applied to multiple-site dental data. The adjusted procedure allows for a comparison of two or more groups of subjects with respect to the prevalence over all sites of a specified characteristic, while taking site-to-site dependencies into account. In this paper, similar adjustments are presented for two other frequently used chi-square procedures, the chi-square test for linear trend and the Mantel-Haenszel test. Examples are given.

REFERENCES

  • Banting, D.W.; Ellen, R.P.; and Fillery, E.D. (1985): A Longitudinal Study of Root Caries: Baseline and Incidence Data, J Dent Res 64:1141-1144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Blomqvist, N. (1985): On the Choice of Computational Unit in Statistical Analysis, J Clin Periodontol 12:873.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Donald, A. and Donner, A. (1987): Adjustments to the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square Statistic and Odds Ratio Variance Estimator when the Data are Clustered, Stat Med 6:491-500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Donner, A. (1985): The Analysis of Intraclass Correlation in Multiple Samples, Ann Hum Gen 49:75-82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Donner, A. and Banting, D.W. (1988): Statistical Analysis of Site-specific Data in Dental Studies, J Dent Res 67:1392-1395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fleiss, J.L. (1981): Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed., New York: John Wiley, pp. 173-175.
  • Fleiss, J.L.; Park, M.H.; and Chilton, N.W. (1987): Within-Mouth Correlations and Reliabilities for Probing Depth and Attachment Level, J Periodontol 58:460-463.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Imrey, P.B. (1986): Considerations in the Statistical Analyses of Clinical Trials in Periodontics, J Clin Periodontol 13:517-528.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Laster, L.L. (1985): The Effect of Subsampling Sites Within Patients, J Periodont Res 20:91-96.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mantel, N. and Haenszel, W. (1959): Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data from Retrospective Studies of Disease, J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719-748.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rosner, B.; Donner, A.; and Hennekens, C.H. (1979): Significance Testing of Interclass Correlations from Familial Data, Biometrics 35:461-471.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 68, No. 9, 1350-1354 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680091201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Gonen, K. S. Panageas, and S. M. Larson
Statistical Issues in Analysis of Diagnostic Imaging Experiments with Multiple Observations per Patient
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 763 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banting, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donner, A.
Right arrow Articles by Banting, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?