|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Influence of Contraction Mismatch and Cooling Rate on Flexural Failure of PFM Systems
J.P. Coffey
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
K.J. Anusavice
Department of Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
P.H. Dehoff
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223
R.B. Lee
Department of Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
B. Hojjatie
Department of Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610
The interactive influence of cooling rate and the sign and magnitude of thermal contraction difference between metals and ceramic veneers on bond strength have not been extensively analyzed, although numerous bond-test studies have been reported during the past two decades. A previous analytical study of residual incompatibility stress in bond-test specimens indicated that bond strength values may be of relatively little value if the residual stress state of the metal-ceramic specimens is not considered. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of cooling rate and contraction mismatch on the flexural failure resistance of metal opaque-porcelain strips.
Specimens were subjected to four-point loading in an Instron testing machine until crack initiation occurred at the metal-ceramic interface. The residual stress states in the ceramic region were estimated from finite element stress analyses of the bond-test specimens by use of dilatometry data obtained at the cooling rate of 3°Clmin. The total stress induced from the residual stress and the applied flexural load was also determined for these specimens. Statistical analyses of the experimental data revealed that the slowly cooled specimens exhibited a significantly lower (p < 0.05) flexural strength compared with rapidly cooled specimens. Regardless of the cooling technique, metal-ceramic specimens with a negative thermal contraction difference ( m - p < 0) failed at significantly lower (p < 0.05) flexural loads than did specimens with a positive thermal contraction difference.
REFERENCES
- Anusavice, K.J.; Dehoff, P.H.; and Fairhurst, C.W. (1980): Comparative Evaluation of Ceramic-Metal Bond Tests Using Finite Element Stress Analysis, J Dent Res 59:603-613.
- Cascone, P.J. (1979): Effect of Thermal Properties on Porcelain-to-Metal Compatibility, IADR Progr & Abst 58:263, Abst. No. 683.
- Ceramco Technical Manual (1976): Ceramco, Inc., New York, p. 32.
- Dehoff, P.H.; Anusavice, K.J.; and Hathcock, P.W. (1982): An Evaluation of the Four-Point Flexural Test for Metal-Ceramic Bond Strength, J Dent Res 61:1066-1069.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dehoff, P.H. and Anusavice, K.J. (1985): Analysis of Alloy-Porcelain Compatibility Using a Multi-component Material Strip Equation, J Dent Res 64:1337-1344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dorsch, P. (1981): Stresses in Metal-Ceramic Systems as a Function of Thermal History, Ceramic Forum Int/Ber Dt Keram Ges 58:1-7.
- Dorsch, P. (1982): Thermal Compatibility of Materials for Porcelain-Fused-To-Metal (PFM) Restorations, Ceramic Forum Intl Ber Dt Keram Ges 59:1-5.
- Fairhurst, C.W.; Anusavice, K.J.; Ringle, R.D.; and Twiggs, S.W. (1981): Porcelain-Metal Thermal Compatibility, J Dent Res 60:815-819.[Free Full Text]
- Guinn, J.W.; Griswald, W.H.; and Vermilyea, S.G. (1982): The Effect of Cooling Rate on the Apparent Bond Strength of Porcelain-Metal Couples, J Prosthet Dent 48:551-554.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Johnson, J.F.; Phillips, R.W.; and Dykema, R.W. (1971): Modern Practice in Crown and Bridge Prosthodontics. 3rd ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., p. 420.
- Johnston, W.M. and O'Brien, W.J. (1980): The Shear Strength of Dental Porcelain, J Dent Res 59:1409-1411.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Phillips, R.W. (1982): Skinner's Science of Dental Materials. 8th ed., Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, pp. 502-503.
- Preston, J.D. (1984): The Metal-Ceramic Restoration. The Problems Remain, J Perio Restor Dent (May):9-23.
- Ringle, R.D.; Webber, R.L.; Anusavice, K.J.; and Fairhurst, C.W. (1978): Thermal Expansion/Contraction Behavior of Dental Porcelain-Alloy, IADR Progr & Abst 57:294, Abst. No. 877.
- Scherer, G.W. (1987): Use of a Biomaterial Strip to Predict Expansion Compatibility, J Dent Res 66:1340.[Free Full Text]
- Schwickerath, H. and Mokbel, A.M. (1983): Über den Einfluss unterschiedlicher Warmeausdehnungskoeffizienten in der Metallkeramik, Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 38:1033-1036.
- Shell, J.S. and Nielsen, J.P. (1962): Study of the Bond Between Gold Alloys and Porcelain, J Dent Res 41:1424-1437.[Free Full Text]
- Tuccillo, J.J. and Nielsen, J.P. (1972): Shear Stress Measurements at the Dental Porcelain-Gold Interface, J Dent Res 51:626-633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Twiggs, S.W.; Anusavice, K.J.; and Fairhurst, C.W. (1980): Effects of Cooling Rates on Porcelain-Alloy Compatibility, AADR Progr & Abst 59:350, Abst. No. 329.
- Tylman, S.D. (1978): Dental Restorations Using Ceramics Fired to Gold Alloy Castings. In: Tylman's Theory and Practice of Fixed Prosthodontics. 7th ed., S.D. Tylman and W.F.P. Malone, Eds., St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Co., pp. 642-644.
- Walton, T.R. and O'Brien, W.J. (1985): Thermal Stress Failure of Porcelain Bonded to a Palladium-Silver Alloy, J Dent Res 64:476-480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Warpeha, W.S. and Goodkind, R.J. (1976): Design and Technique Variables Affecting Fracture Resistance of Metal-Ceramic Restorations, J Prosthet Dent 35:291-298.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 67, No. 1,
61-65 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/00220345880670011201

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ban and K.J. Anusavice
Influence of Test Method on Failure Stress of Brittle Dental Materials
Journal of Dental Research,
December 1, 1990;
69(12):
1791 - 1799.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|