Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ettlin, D.A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, L.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ettlin, D.A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, L.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Clinical

Stereometric Assessment of TMJ Space Variation by Occlusal Splints

D.A. Ettlin*, H. Mang, V. Colombo, S. Palla and L.M. Gallo

Clinic for Masticatory Disorders, Removable Prosthodontics and Special Care Dentistry, Center for Oral Medicine, Dental and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Zürich, Switzerland, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland

Correspondence: * corresponding author, dominik.ettlin{at}zzmk.uzh.ch


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Occlusal splints are used for the management of temporomandibular disorders, although their mechanism of action remains controversial. This study investigated whether insertion of an occlusal splint leads to condyle-fossa distance changes, and to mandibular rotation and/or translation. By combining magnetic resonance images with jaw tracking (dynamic stereometry), we analyzed the intra-articular distances of 20 human temporomandibular joints (TMJs) before and after insertion of occlusal splints of 3 mm thickness in the first molar region. For habitual closure, protrusion, and laterotrusion in the contralateral joint, occlusal splints led to minor—yet statistically significant—increases of global TMJ space and to larger increases at defined condylar areas. Condylar end rotation and translation in habitual closure were reduced. Hence, the insertion of a 3-mm-thick occlusal splint led to a change in the topographical condyle-fossa relationship, and therefore to a new distribution of contact areas between joint surfaces.

Key Words: biomechanics • Magnetic Resonance Imaging • stress • mechanical • occlusal splints • temporomandibular joint disorders • temporomandibular joint


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Signs and symptoms of myoarthropathies of the masticatory system (MAP), i.e., of craniomandibular disorders, are quite common. In approximately 3.6 to 7% of affected persons, the symptoms are severe enough to require treatment (Okeson, 1996). The MAP etiology appears to be multifactorial and includes structural overload and lack of tissue adaptation (Milam, 2006; Stegenga and de Bont, 2006).

In clinical practice, oral splints are one of the most common treatment modalities, in addition to physical therapy, medication, psychological treatment, and, ultimately, surgery (Dionne et al., 2006). Splint treatment is non-invasive and reversible if correctly applied; however, its mechanism of action has not been elucidated, and controversial ideas exist about its clinical indication and functioning. These include placebo effect, changes in occlusion, improvement of jaw-muscle function, modification of oral behavior, recruitment of different motor units, behavioral intervention, and new positioning of the condyle and/or the articular disc (Dao and Lavigne, 1998; Al-Ani et al., 2004; Forssell and Kalso, 2004; Nilner, 2004; Turp et al., 2004; Schindler et al., 2006). Regardless of its mode of action, some randomized clinical trials and literature reviews have documented its therapeutic effectiveness (Kreiner et al., 2001; Ekberg et al., 2002; Kuttila et al., 2002).

The literature is not conclusive on whether an occlusal splint increases the condyle-fossa distance, as shown by measurements performed on radiographs of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) (Moncayo, 1994; Ekberg et al., 1998; Kuboki et al., 1999; Lau and Green, 2003). Dynamic stereometry facilitates a non-invasive, in vivo, three-dimensional, and person-specific analysis of the condyle-fossa distance during static positions and mandibular movements. The technique combines the three-dimensional reconstruction of the TMJ anatomy obtained by magnetic resonance (MR) images with jaw motion data obtained by tracking the jaw with 6 degrees of freedom (Palla et al., 2003; Gossi et al., 2004; Gallo, 2005).

The aim of this study was to analyze, by dynamic stereometry, the effect of the insertion of an occlusal splint of 3-mm thickness on (1) the minimum condyle fossa-distance, (2) the condyle-fossa distance closest in maximum intercuspation, and (3) condylar rotation and translation.


    MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Participants
Ten healthy asymptomatic individuals (five males and five females; age range, 18 to 31 yrs) participated in the study after giving informed consent. They were free of signs and symptoms of a myoarthropathy, as revealed by history and clinical examination. Exclusion criteria were tenderness to palpation of masticatory muscles and TMJ area, painful jaw movements (maximum mouth opening < 40 mm, laterotrusion and protrusion < 7 mm), TMJ pathological signs on MR images, systemic diseases, or contraindications for MR recordings (implanted metal or medical devices, claustrophobia, tattoos). The local ethics committee approved the study protocol.

Occlusal Splint
The maxillary occlusal splint was constructed in a Gerber articulator (Condylator Service, Zürich, Switzerland) after the vertical dimension between the casts was increased until a clearance of slightly more than 3 mm between the mesial marginal ridge of the first molar and the opposing occlusal surfaces was reached. The splint, processed by means of cold-cure acrylic (Candulor Aesthetic, Candulor AG, Wangen b. Dübendorf, Switzerland), had all the features of a Michigan splint, i.e., coverage of all teeth, one occlusal contact point per antagonist, freedom in centric and canine guidance in protrusion and laterotrusion, to produce occlusal clearance in the molar area of approximately 1 mm. Only the slope of the anterior canine guidance was modified. Two grooves of approximately 1-mm depth were carved into the cuspid rise to guide the protrusive and laterotrusive movements reproducibly. After being processed, the splint was remounted and adjusted until one occlusal contact per antagonist and a thickness of approximated 3 mm in the first molar area were reached. For confirmation of splint thickness, a small hole was drilled in the splint at the mesial marginal ridge of the first molar, and verification measurements were performed by means of a calibrated rod inserted into the hole.

The same casts were also used to construct the metal frames used to attach the frames carrying the light-emitting diodes (LED) to the dental arches (Mang, 2006).

Data Acquisition
MR images were obtained from both temporomandibular joints and then software-reconstructed three-dimensionally (3D). The jaw was tracked opto-electronically. The tracking data were then combined with the anatomical data to display the position and the motion of the entire condyle within the fossa in 3D. This method, called "dynamic stereometry", has been described in detail elsewhere (Palla et al., 2003; Gallo, 2005).

Experimental Procedure
At first, the occlusal splint was adjusted with the person sitting upright and performing rapid unguided opening and closing movements in the habitual closure path (habitual closure without splint = maximum intercuspation). The adjustment was terminated when even contacts between the splint occlusal surface and each antagonistic tooth were recorded by means of an articulating foil (Hanel 12 µ), and the person felt even occlusal contacts. Thereafter, the splint was removed, and the metal frames carrying the LEDs were attached to the upper and lower dental arches by means of light-cured glass-ionomer cement (Vitrebond, 3M ESPE, 3M AG, Rüschlikon, Switzerland). After the measurements required to combine the jaw-tracking coordinates with those of the MR images were taken (Fig. 1AGo), the person was asked to bite effortlessly in habitual closure (static measurement), and this position was recorded by means of the 3 one-dimensional charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras of the opto-electronic system 3 times for approximately 1 sec each. Subsequently, 3 series of 4 protrusive and 4 laterotrusive movements to the right and left under tooth guidance were recorded (dynamic measurements). Finally, the splint was inserted, and corresponding recordings were performed, all with splint contact (Fig. 1BGo).


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Method of data acquisition and analysis. (A) Person biting on the monobloc with the reference system in place. (1) Box with the 3 reference spheres visible in the MRI system. (2) Reference target frame attached to the sagittal arm of the face bow. (B) Jaw tracking with the 3-mm splint inserted. (3) Maxillary target frame. (4) Mandibular target frame. (C) Global minimum condyle fossa-distance (hmin), defined as the mean of the 30 minimal distances between the polygon vertices approximating the condyle and fossa surfaces.

 
Data Analysis
Condyle-Fossa Distance
The effect of the occlusal splint on the condyle-fossa distance was assessed by two parameters: (1) the global minimum condyle fossa-distance (hmin), defined as the mean of the 30 minimal distances between the polygon vertices of the condyle and fossa surfaces (Fig. 1CGo); and (2) the condyle-fossa distance (h0) at the condylar point P0, defined as the point on the condylar surface closest to the fossa in maximum intercuspation, i.e., without the person wearing the splint (Fig. 2AGo). In this situation, hmin was identical to h0. The spatial coordinates of hmin in relation to the condylar surface were determined for the recordings without and with splint obtained in closed position. The parameters hmin and h0 were averaged over all time steps during each recording. The condyle-fossa distance during laterotrusion was calculated only for the balancing-side joint.


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Depiction of analysis parameters. (A) Representation of the condyle-fossa distance at point P0 (h0) with and without the occlusal splint. (B) Graphical representation of the parameters used to calculate rotation and translation. All drawings are schematic and exaggerated for clarification purposes.

 
Condylar Translation and Rotation
To analyze the effect of occlusal splint insertion on condylar position, we computed the spatial translation (mm) and rotation (°) around the condylar main axis (Fig. 2BGo). The reference point for the rotation was the mid-point of the condylar main axis connecting the 2 condylar poles. A detailed description of the materials and methods has been published elsewhere (Mang, 2006).

Statistical Analysis
Data from the left joints were mirrored so that all asymmetric parameters had the medial part on the left and the lateral part on the right. After Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, data were analyzed by analysis of variance for repeated measurements at a significance level of p < 0.05, with the following intra-individual factors: side, presence/absence of splint, and mandibular position/movement (habitual closure, protrusion, laterotrusion).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Condyle-Fossa Distance
Global Minimum Condyle-Fossa Distance (hmin)
The insertion of the occlusal splint led to a slight, yet statistically significant, increase of hmin for all positions: habitual closure (median/mean of 0.3/0.3 mm; interquartile range, 0.2 to 0.6 mm), protrusion (median/mean of 0.4/0.3 mm; interquartile range, 0.0 to 0.5 mm), and laterotrusion (median/mean of 0.3/0.2 mm; interquartile range, 0.0 to 0.6 mm) (TableGo). The increase in hmin was found in 16 TMJs in closed position and in 15 TMJs during protrusion and laterotrusion. Splint insertion led to a change in the position of the global minimum joint space in relation to the condylar surface dorsoventrally (median of 1.7 mm, range –7.5 to 5.4 mm), lateromedially (median of 1.8 mm, range –2.1 to 7.7 mm), and craniocaudally (median of 2 mm, range –1 to 4.6 mm) (example of one joint in Fig. 3AGo). The displacement vectors for all left and right joints are represented in Fig. 3BGo.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table. Condyle-Fossa Distance Parameters without and with Occlusal Splint and Differences (1st q = first quartile; 3rd q = third quartile; * = p < 0.05; ** = 0.01; *** = 0.001)
 

Figure 3
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Changes in TMJ space due to splint insertion. (A) Example of the position of the global minimum joint space (hmin) in habitual closure without and with the occlusal splint. (B) Displacement vectors (in red) of h0 for all left and right joints studied. The shaded portion of the Fig. shows the average main condylar axes (in orange) and hemi-ellipses bordering the cranio-ventral quadrants of the condyles (in brown). The intracondylar distance is not to scale. All displacement vectors are located cranio-ventrally to the main condylar axes. Cc, caudocranial; dv, dorsoventral; rl, right-left.

 
Condyle-Fossa Distance (h0) at Point P0
The insertion of the occlusal splint produced a statistically significant increase of h0 for all positions: habitual closure (median/ mean of 1.5/1.6 mm; interquartile range, 0.9 to 2.1 mm), protrusion (median/mean of 1.7/1.8 mm; interquartile range, 1.3 to 1.9 mm), and laterotrusion (median/mean of 1.6/1.6 mm; interquartile range, 1.1 to 2.1 mm) (TableGo). The increase was observed in all joints.

Condylar Translation and Rotation
After occlusal splint insertion, the condyle rotated by a median value of 3.7° (range, 2.0° to 4.1°), and its long axis translated ventrally (median of 1 mm; range, –0.9 to 2.7 mm) and caudally (median of –1.2 mm; range, –2.9 to 3.7 mm), but not mediolaterally.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The objective of this study was to analyze, by means of dynamic stereometry, the effect of the insertion of a 3-mm-thick occlusal splint on the condyle-fossa distance in asymptomatic persons while mandibular teeth were kept occluding in various positions, such as habitual closure, during protrusion, and during laterotrusion. This study is therefore the first to provide an analysis of changes in the condyle-fossa distance, not only three-dimensionally and dynamically, but also over the entire joint surface, in contrast to other studies, where the condyle-fossa distances were measured statically and only on one joint section (Kuboki et al., 1997, 1999).

The results revealed that the global minimum condyle-fossa distance hmin increased significantly after the insertion of a 3-mm-thick occlusal splint for effortless habitual closure, as well as during sliding movements. The increase was small, however, and it is arguable whether this difference translates into joint load reduction. Due to the incongruent shapes of both the condyle and the fossa, the location of hmin shifted in all joints. Analysis of our data further revealed a slight ventral and caudal shift of the condyle and a simultaneous jaw opening in persons wearing the occlusal splint.

Also, the minimum condyle-fossa distance h0 at point P0 (i.e., the point on the condylar surface closest to the fossa in maximum intercuspation with the person not wearing the splint) increased significantly with splint insertion, both in habitual closure as well as during sliding movements. The variation of h0 was much larger than the variation of hmin. This change might be caused either by the rotation/translation of the condyle-disc complex and/or by a different disc thickness that would coincide with P0 at the new condylar position. It is worth noting that P0 was never located in the most posterior condylar region. As for the measurement of hmin, notable inter-individual differences have also been observed for h0, possibly due to differences in joint anatomy.

It has been postulated that during clenching as well as jaw movements, forces between the condyle and the articular eminence are compressive and tangential in nature and undergo different magnitude levels (Kuboki et al., 1997, 1999). It can be assumed that the intra-articular distance is mainly influenced by the disc’s poroviscoelastic properties (Beek et al., 2003). These allow the disc to serve as the primary element for stress distribution and shock absorption. When its properties are altered, the functional effectiveness of the disc is reduced, presumably resulting in increased joint failure (Chen et al., 1999). Hence, degenerative joint disorders may be the result of mechanical joint overload, and there seems to be an association between the intensity and frequency of mechanical stress and the reaction of the cartilage matrix (Milam and Schmitz, 1995). Investigating joint load in vivo, however, requires invasive direct monitoring of joint forces, which has never been successfully performed due to technical challenges. Therefore, rather than investigating intra-articular distances of the TMJ under load, this study focused on joint space changes when joint forces were minimized by keeping the mandibular teeth occluding with only minimal pressure in effortless habitual closure.

We also observed that the path of the minimum condyle-fossa distance during movements varied, likely due to person-specific TMJ morphologies (data not reported). This effect, as well as the shift of the area of minimum condyle-fossa distance in habitual closure after occlusal splint insertion, is an indirect indicator of changes in contact areas, and therefore contact stresses, between and among the different joint components. This contact area shift may contribute to an altered TMJ mechanical environment, a concept well-established for other load-bearing joints, such as the knee, where wedge osteotomies are performed to redistribute contact stresses for the management of osteoarthritis (Dahl et al., 2005; Brouwer et al., 2006; Ramsey et al., 2007).

However, the findings of this study must be interpreted with caution regarding pain relief following splint therapy in the case, for instance, of osteoarthritis. First, our data were collected on a sample of asymptomatic persons, and therefore cannot be extrapolated to pain patients. Second, dynamic stereometry is based on the reconstruction and animation of the TMJ by means of anatomical and kinematic data. Although the technique is currently the most suitable method to study variations of the intra-articular space under static and dynamic conditions, it is still unknown whether mandibular deformation affects condyle-fossa measurements under larger bite forces, as might occur during parafunction. Nevertheless, it has been reported that bilateral biting in the canine area, even with a force up to 150 N, does not produce a mandibular deformation in the premolar area (Jiang and Ai, 2002). Since the participants in this study held the mandible effortlessly in contact with the opposing arch (without and with splint), it can be reasonably assumed that negligible deformation occurred in the TMJ area.

With the same method, results of experiments in which the person was asked to clench on a force transducer placed in different areas of the dental arch showed that the minimum intra-articular distance decreased with increasing bite forces (unpublished observations). It is therefore likely that the augmented global minimum intra-articular distance found in this study could be neutralized if the person were to clench or brux with high force. Splint insertion, however, is likely to cause a shift in the position of the minimum intra-articular distance (and therefore of the contact stress areas), when habitual closure as well as sliding movements occur with high force. This will be the focus of future studies.

In conclusion, dynamic stereometry showed that the insertion of a 3-mm-thick occlusal splint led to a redistribution of the condyle-fossa distances in the TMJ, both during habitual closure as well as during sliding movements, thus redistributing contact areas between joint surfaces.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the standard financial plan of the University of Zürich and by Grant #325200-110067 of the Swiss National Science Foundation, Berne, Switzerland.

Received for publication November 23, 2007. Revision received May 8, 2008. Accepted for publication June 16, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Sloan P, Glenny AM (2004). Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1):CD002778.
  • Beek M, Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM (2003). Human temporomandibular joint disc cartilage as a poroelastic material. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 18:69–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Raaij TM, Verhaar JA (2006). Osteotomy for medial compartment arthritis of the knee using a closing wedge or an opening wedge controlled by a Puddu plate. A one-year randomised, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1454–1459.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Chen CT, Burton-Wurster N, Lust G, Bank RA, Tekoppele JM (1999). Compositional and metabolic changes in damaged cartilage are peak-stress, stress-rate, and loading-duration dependent. J Orthop Res 17:870–879.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM (2005). A 2-year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes in patients operated on for knee osteoarthritis with tibial osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:18.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Dao TT, Lavigne GJ (1998). Oral splints: the crutches for temporomandibular disorders and bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:345–361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Dionne RA, Feine JS, Thomason JM, Clark GT, Minakuchi H, Ohrbach R, et al. (2006). Therapeutic modalities. In: TMDs, an evidence based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Laskin DM, Greene CS, Hylander WL, editors. Hanover Park, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 347–419.
  • Ekberg EC, Sabet ME, Petersson A, Nilner M (1998). Occlusal appliance therapy in a short-term perspective in patients with temporomandibular disorders correlated to condyle position. Int J Prosthodont 11:263–268.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ekberg E, Vallon D, Nilner M (2002). Treatment outcome of headache after occlusal appliance therapy in a randomised controlled trial among patients with temporomandibular disorders of mainly arthrogenous origin. Swed Dent J 26:115–124.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Forssell H, Kalso E (2004). Application of principles of evidence-based medicine to occlusal treatment for temporomandibular disorders: are there lessons to be learned? J Orofac Pain 18:9–22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gallo LM (2005). Modeling of temporomandibular joint function using MRI and jaw-tracking technologies—mechanics. Cells Tissues Organs 180:54–68.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gossi DB, Gallo LM, Bahr E, Palla S (2004). Dynamic intra-articular space variation in clicking TMJs. J Dent Res 83:480–484.
  • Jiang T, Ai M (2002). In vivo mandibular elastic deformation during clenching on pivots. J Oral Rehabil 29:201–208.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kreiner M, Betancor E, Clark GT (2001). Occlusal stabilization appliances. Evidence of their efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc 132:770–777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kuboki T, Azuma Y, Orsini MG, Hirooka T, Yatani H, Yamashita A (1997). The effect of occlusal appliances and clenching on the temporomandibular joint space. J Orofac Pain 11:67–77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuboki T, Takenami Y, Orsini MG, Maekawa K, Yamashita A, Azuma Y, et al. (1999). Effect of occlusal appliances and clenching on the internally deranged TMJ space. J Orofac Pain 13:38–48.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuttila M, Le Bont Y, Savolainen-Niemi E, Kuttila S, Alanen P (2002). Efficiency of occlusal appliance therapy in secondary otalgia and temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand 60:248–254.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lau KU, Green WF 2nd (2003). Orthosis thickness and its effect on temporomandibular joint space. Cranio 21:209–220.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mang H (2006). Stereometric assessment of TMJ space variation due to occlusal splints (dissertation). Zürich, Switzerland: University of Zürich.
  • Milam SB (2006). TMJ osteoarthritis. In: TMDs, an evidence based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Laskin DM, Greene CS, Hylander WL, editors. Hanover Park, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 105–123.
  • Milam SB, Schmitz JP (1995). Molecular biology of temporomandibular joint disorders: proposed mechanisms of disease. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1448–1454.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Moncayo S (1994). Biomechanics of pivoting appliances. J Orofac Pain 8:190–196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Nilner M (2004). Does splint therapy work for temporomandibular pain? Evid Based Dent 5:65–66.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Okeson JP (1996). Differential diagnosis and management considerations of temporomandiubular disorders. In: Orofacial pain. Guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. Okeson JP, editor. Carol Stream, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 113–184.
  • Palla S, Gallo LM, Gossi D (2003). Dynamic stereometry of the temporomandibular joint. Orthod Craniofac Res 6(Suppl 1):37–47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, Lewek M, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS (2007). Effect of anatomic realignment on muscle function during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57:389–397.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schindler HJ, Rues S, Turp JC, Lenz J (2006). Heterogeneous activation of the medial pterygoid muscle during simulated clenching. Arch Oral Biol 51:498–504.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stegenga B, de Bont LGM (2006). TMJ disc derangements. In: TMDs, an evidence based approach to diagnosis and treatment. Laskin DM, Greene CS, Hylander WL, editors. Hanover Park, IL, USA: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., pp. 125–136.
  • Turp JC, Komine F, Hugger A (2004). Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 8:179–195.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 9, 877-881 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700903


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ettlin, D.A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, L.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ettlin, D.A.
Right arrow Articles by Gallo, L.M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?