Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biological

Trabecular Bone Structures in the Edentulous Diastema of Osteoporotic Sheep

G. Dvorak1,2, R. Gruber1,2,*, C.D. Huber1,2, J. Goldhahn3, G. Zanoni2,4, D. Salaberger5, G. Watzek1,2 and R. Haas6

1 Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Währingerstrasse 25a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
2 Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria;
3 Schulthess Klinik Zürich, Switzerland;
4 Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria;
5 Upper Austrian University of Applied Science, Wels, Austria; and
6 Academy of Oral Implantology, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence: * corresponding author, reinhard.gruber{at}meduniwien.ac.at


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The edentulous ovine diastema represents a suitable region for implantological research. Due to distinctive embryonic origin and mechanical loading, the edentulous diastema may respond differently to osteoporosis than tooth-bearing areas. To test this assumption, we subjected geriatric sheep to ovariectomy, calcium-/vitamin-D-restricted diet, and methylprednisolone administration. Adult control sheep remained untreated. Structural parameters and bone mineral density were determined by microcomputed tomography and conventional computed tomography, respectively. We report that the trabecular microstructure in the diastema was preserved from catabolic changes. In contrast, the premolar maxillary region of osteoporotic sheep had diminished trabecular bone mineral density, with the corresponding structural deteriorations. These results suggest that maxillary trabecular bone of the edentulous diastema does not respond to catabolic changes which occur in the tooth-bearing area in osteoporosis. Our findings imply that regional anatomic domains must be considered in the planning of pre-clinical studies, taking osteoporotic changes into account.

Key Words: maxilla • osteoporosis • sheep • µCT • trabecular bone


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
With increasing life expectancy in coming decades, the number of elderly people is predicted to increase. Population demographics further implicate an increase in the number of persons with osteoporosis (Riggs and Melton, 1995; Sambrook and Cooper, 2006). Accordingly, the demand of elderly persons with osteoporosis for implant-supported prosthodontics will likely increase over the decades. Aging and osteoporosis, however, are associated with structural changes of the alveolar bone, including the posterior maxilla (Ulm et al., 1997, 1999). Deterioration of the maxillary microstructure requires sophisticated surgical techniques for a stable implant fixation (Martinez et al., 2001; Molly, 2006). Thus, there is a clear demand for pre-clinical models taking into account the physiologically determinant age and clinical conditions that lead to bone loss, such as hypogonadism, malnutrition, and glucocorticoids (Canalis et al., 2007; Holick, 2007).

Pre-clinical models must meet at least two requirements: first, a systemic bone mineral density 2.5 standard deviations below peak bone mass of adult animals, according to the clinical WHO definition of osteoporosis (Genant et al., 1999); and second, a compromised maxillary bone microstructure in the region of future augmentation or implant placement. Sheep are considered suitable for pre-clinical testing in oral implant research (Haas et al., 1998; 2002). Sheep show systemic bone loss and reduced mandibular bone mass following ovariectomy (Johnson et al., 2002). However, the magnitude of bone loss does not reach the WHO threshold level (Egermann et al., 2008), and the detrimental effect of ovariectomy is reversible (Sigrist et al., 2007). To achieve a permanent and substantial bone loss, we performed ovariectomies on geriatric sheep, treated them with glucocorticoids, and fed them a calcium-/vitamin-D-restricted diet (Goldhahn et al., 2005). The amount of systemic bone loss satisfies the clinical definition of osteoporosis (Raisz, 2005; Egermann et al., 2008). Whether and how maxillary bone microstructure is influenced in this osteoporosis model remain unknown.

The sheep maxilla is different from that in humans, since an edentulous diastema separates incisors from molars (Thomason et al., 2001). In the diastema region, rudimentary tooth anlagen regress and do not develop into teeth (Tucker and Sharpe, 2004). Thus, the diastema region does not require tooth extraction and may represent a suitable area for pre-clinical studies of oral implant research. However, bone from both the diastema and the tooth-bearing area is distinct with regard to embryonic origin and mechanical loading (Thomason et al., 2001; Hovorakova et al., 2005). Bone from the diastema and the tooth-bearing area may respond differently to systemic changes caused by osteoporosis. It can be questioned whether osteoporotic microstructural changes in the diastema region exhibit the same magnitude as in the premolar region of the posterior maxilla. If the diastema region is less subjected to functional loading than the premolars, we would expect that the changes in trabecular bone structure are more pronounced in the diastema.

In this study, we report on bone microstructure and bone mass in the diastema and the tooth-bearing region of the maxilla in geriatric ovariectomized sheep treated with glucocorticoids and fed a calcium-/vitamin-D-restricted diet. Using this animal model, we have investigated whether catabolic changes follow regional anatomic domains of the diastema and the premolar region.


    MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals
Approval for this animal study was obtained from the Animal Experimentation Commission of the Veterinary Office of the Canton of Grison, Switzerland, and strictly followed the guidelines of the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office for the use and care of laboratory animals. Osteoporosis induction took place at the AO Research Institute in Davos, Switzerland. Diagnostic processing of the sheep heads was performed at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. Twelve female Swiss White Mountain sheep were divided into two groups. The animals of the control group were between 3.2 and 5.2 yrs old (mean, 3.8 ± 0.9), with an average weight of 62.8 ± 12.2 kg. The sheep of the osteoporosis group were between 6.9 and 9.0 yrs old (mean, 7.5 ± 1.0) and weighed 65.6 ± 9.6 kg on average (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Characteristics of Animals in Control (n = 6) and Osteoporosis Groups (n = 6), Indicating Weight at Baseline (kg), Period of Housing for the Control Group and Methylprednisolone Administration in the Osteoporosis Group (mos), and Age at the Time of Death (yrs)
 
Osteoporosis Induction
Bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) was performed through a low median laparotomy under general anesthesia with Isofluran (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ, USA) and intravenous Temgesic (buprenorphine HCl, 0.3 mg/mL, Reckitt & Colman Pharmaceutics, Hull, UK). The control group was fed a standard diet with normal calcium and vitamin D levels (5 g calcium and 1000 IU vitamin D3/day) and received no surgical intervention. The diet for the osteoporosis group contained just 1.5 g calcium and 100 IU vitamin D3 a day (Eberle Nafag AG, Gossau, Switzerland). The total amount of 2000 mg methylprednisolone solution (Streuli & Co AG Pharmazeutika, 8730 Uznach, Switzerland) was given to the animals by intramuscular injection. Steroid application and the calcium-/vitamin-D-restricted diet began 2 wks following ovariectomy over a period of 4 to 8 mos (Egermann et al., 2008) (Table 1Go). The clinical condition of all animals was documented daily. Animals were killed by intravenous administration of 20 mL Pentobarbital 162 mg/mL (Vetanarcol®, Intervet, Vienna, Austria).

Quantitative CT Imaging
Quantitative dental computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed with a Philips Tomoscan SR 6000 (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) and a standard protocol of contiguous scans with 1.5 mm collimation width, 1 mm table feed, and a high-resolution kernel. A calibration standard of hydroxyapatite containing 0, 75, and 150 mg/cm3, respectively (Dental Phantom, Image Analysis, Columbia, KY, USA), was used (Fig. 1Go). On 3 slices, the region of interest (ROI) was considered the anterior extension at the frontal limit of the maxillary sinus and its posterior extension adjacent to the first molar, above the root apices of all 3 premolar teeth on the right and left sides. An inner contour around the cortex was marked manually (Fig. 1Go). CT image analyses were performed with Amira 4.0® (Visage Imaging, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Mean Hounsfield units were calculated for the ROI on the left and right sides and averaged for every sheep. Calibration was performed individually for every maxilla and based on a linear relationship. Voxel values of the scans were converted from Hounsfield units to BMD values by means of the following equation: BMD= a x HU + b, where a and b are individual calibration coefficients (Homolka et al., 2001; Beer et al., 2003).


Figure 1
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Quantitative CT imaging. Computed tomography slice containing the region of interest above the highest root of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd premolar teeth, with its anterior extension the most anterior point of the maxillary sinus, and the posterior limit marked by the first molar root. Calibration standards containing known concentrations of calcium hydroxyapatite (yellow, 0; orange, 0.75; and red, 150 mg/cm3).

 
MicroCT Imaging
MicroCT scanning was performed with an industrial device (RayScan 250E, Wälischmiller, Meersburg, Germany). The scans were performed on the right maxilla (150 kV, 1 sec integration time, 900 projections, 1024 x 1024 a-Si flat panel detector, cone-beam reconstruction). A region of 330 mm³ volume above the highest root of the 2nd premolar and the edentulous diastema was chosen for evaluation (Fig. 2Go). Nominal isotropic resolution was 70 µm, the dataset was around 1000 x 1000 x 1000 voxels, and the analysis region was represented by 100 microtomographic slices. Trabecular and cortical regions were separated by semi-automatically drawn contours, and the complete trabecular structure of the chosen region was evaluated. The grey-scale images were Gaussian-filtered ({sigma} = 1.2, support = 2), with a threshold (7.0% of maximum grey value) to form binary images on which morphological analyses were performed. We used three-dimensional analysis techniques (Image Processing Language, Scanco Medical, Bassersdorf, Switzerland) to assess bone volume ratio (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), trabecular number (Tb.N), and structural model index (SMI). The structure model index quantifies the characteristic form of the cancellous bone in terms of plate-like to rod-like. For an ideal plate and rod structure, this index is 0 and 3, respectively (Hildebrand and Ruegsegger, 1997).


Figure 2
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. MicroCT imaging. Three-dimensional scan of a sheep maxilla, with enlargement indicating the regions of interest for R1 (diastema) and R2 (2nd premolar).

 
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics of all variables were determined, including means and standard deviations. Results were considered to be significant at p < 0.05. The results of individual animals and group averages were plotted. We used a one-way ANOVA to analyze the differences between groups.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Clinical Condition of the Sheep
Healing after ovariectomy was uneventful in all animals. During osteoporosis induction, some adverse side-effects appeared. Three animals from the osteoporosis group developed abscesses at the injection sites, which were caused by an infection with Mycobacterium pseudotuberculosis. After incision and regular wound care, these healed uneventfully after a few days.

Quantitative CT Imaging
From the right and left premolar regions, bone mineral density values (mg/cm³) were calculated. The sheep in the osteoporosis group showed a 60% decline in trabecular bone. Mean bone mineral density in the osteoporosis group, averaged for left and right sides, was 73.8 ± 24.8 mg/cm³, compared with 185.0 ± 78.4 mg/cm³ in the control group (p = 0.02).

MicroCT Imaging
The analysis of bone structure by microCT was performed at the diastema (R1) and second premolar region (R2). The molar region could not be evaluated due to the proximity of the sinus maxillaris. Bone structure parameters of the two different anatomical locations in control sheep were virtually equal. Moreover, in the diastema region, no significant difference in bone structure parameters could be found between the groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, the premolar region of osteoporotic sheep exhibited a significant decline in the bone volume ratio of 64% (p = 0.03). The reduction of the bone volume ratio was associated with a trabecular thickness reduction of 33%, but not with a change in trabecular number. Although not significant (p = 0.07), the structural model index further indicates that catabolic changes in osteoporosis are associated with a shift of plate-like trabecular structure into a rod-like structure in the premolar region. Thus, in osteoporosis, trabeculae in the premolar region are preserved, but are getting thinner, while in the diastema region, morphology remains constant (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Micro-architecture of Cancellous Bone Determined by MicroCT (mean ± SD) at Different Anatomical Locations
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pre-clinical models reflecting the compromised situation of maxillary bone in adult persons with osteoporosis are critical for progress in oral implant research. However, the impact of catabolic bone turnover on different regions in the maxilla is unknown. To determine the suitability of the edentulous diastema for pre-clinical studies in an osteoporotic background, we examined whether catabolic changes become apparent in the diastema region, and if the tooth-bearing regions respond differently. We therefore performed microCT analysis of the maxillary trabecular compartment and compared the structural parameters from geriatric osteoporotic sheep with those of adult sheep. The main observation of this study is that aging and osteoporosis induction considerably reduced the structural parameters of the premolar region, but not of the diastema region.

Ovariectomy, malnutrition, and glucocorticoid application in sheep cause a rapid and sustained decline in bone mass of the appendicular skeleton, according to the WHO definition of osteoporosis (Lill et al., 2002a,b). The osteoporotic sheep have a reported decrease in structural parameters of bone volume (26%, 30%, 57%) and trabecular thickness (24%, 68%, 50%) in the femur head, vertebra, and iliac crest, respectively (Lill et al., 2002b). Using the same animal model, we obtained evidence that these catabolic changes also occurred in the premolar region of the maxilla, with a 64% decrease in bone volume ratio accompanied by a 33% thinning of trabecular thickness. Structural changes of the trabeculae were associated with a shift from a plate-like to a rod-like structure, based on the structure model index algorithm (Hildebrand and Ruegsegger, 1997). Moreover, a considerable decrease in premolar trabecular bone mineral density was observed. The results of our study are consistent with the assumption that osteoporosis is a systemic disease affecting all bones, at least in the trabecular compartment. However, our finding that the diastema region in osteoporotic sheep is protected from the catabolic changes suggests that regional anatomic domains respond in their individual way to changes in systemic bone remodeling.

The mechanisms that underlie the absence of catabolic changes in the diastema remain unknown. Supported by the concept of Urist and Reddi proposing that the response of bone is individually affected by the embryologic origin and the specific mechanical input (Reddi, 1975), a potential explanation may be that the different embryologic origins and local biomechanical strain are responsible for the preservation of trabecular structure. This concept is in accord with observations in ovariectomized rats in which bone loss was locally increased in the tibia, compared with bone loss in the mandible (Mavropoulos et al., 2007). Furthermore, bone loss was increased in the mandible, lacking the antagonist, as a response to diminished loading by the extracted antagonist (Elovic et al., 1995). Nevertheless, these studies do not necessarily support our findings that trabecular bone reacts differently, depending on the localization, in the same skeletal structure. Studies will be required to assess whether and by which mechanism trabecular bone in the appendicular skeleton may also be protected from systemic bone loss in osteoporosis.

Although the posterior maxilla is a critical anatomical region in implant dentistry, clinical evidence about an association with bone loss in axial and appendicular skeleton is rather weak (von Wowern and Worsaae, 1988; Drage et al., 2007). Most studies were performed on mandibles with the more cortical appearance (von Wowern, 2001; Lindh et al., 2004; Devlin et al., 2007). The reason for this may be related to the difficulties of densitometric evaluation in maxillary bone compared with the different regions of the mandible, and the limited potential of CT to differentiate trabecular from cortical bone (Stoppie et al., 2006). Moreover, like ovariectomy, aging, glucocorticoid administration, and vitamin D deficiency are associated with systemic bone loss and structural changes in the alveolar bone (von Wowern et al., 1992; Hildebolt et al., 2004). Therefore, the impact of each factor on the overall structural changes observed in the premolar region of our animal model requires further investigation. We do not know if the edentulous premolar region shows the same response and resembles the diastema region by preserving the trabecular structure. Eventually, the impact of osteoporosis is different in the human edentulous situation and more pronounced than in the ovine diastema model.

In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the diastema region of sheep undergoing ovariectomy, and experiencing malnutrition and glucocorticoid application, resists the catabolic changes that cause bone loss in the premolar region. The preservation of trabecular bone structure in the diastema suggests that regional anatomic domains respond differently to systemic changes in bone turnover. It will be important to reveal the underlying mechanism to determine a target that helps to preserve bone strength in osteoporosis. Also, studies will be required to determine if the data are exclusive to the diastema region, which is restricted to animals, or if edentulous regions may behave similarly. Finally, it has been suggested that the diastema region in the sheep model does not represent a tool to simulate the structural changes required for a relevant pre-clinical model.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors acknowledge Prof. Andre Gahleitner for valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was supported by the Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Received for publication January 29, 2008. Revision received June 3, 2008. Accepted for publication June 18, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Beer A, Gahleitner A, Holm A, Tschabitscher M, Homolka P (2003). Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:616–620.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Canalis E, Mazziotti G, Giustina A, Bilezikian JP (2007). Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathophysiology and therapy. Osteoporos Int 18:1319–1328.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Devlin H, Karayianni K, Mitsea A, Jacobs R, Lindh C, van der Stelt P, et al. (2007). Diagnosing osteoporosis by using dental panoramic radiographs: the OSTEODENT project. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:821–828.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Drage NA, Palmer RM, Blake G, Wilson R, Crane F, Fogelman I (2007). A comparison of bone mineral density in the spine, hip and jaws of edentulous subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:496–500.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Egermann M, Goldhahn J, Holz R, Schneider E, Lill C (2008). A sheep model for fracture treatment in osteoporosis—benefits of the model vs animal welfare. Lab Anim (in press).
  • Elovic RP, Hipp JA, Hayes WC (1995). Maxillary molar extraction causes increased bone loss in the mandible of ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 10:1087–1093.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I, Ehrlich G, Kanis J, et al. (1999). Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 10:259–264.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Goldhahn J, Jenet A, Schneider E, Lill CA (2005). Slow rebound of cancellous bone after mainly steroid-induced osteoporosis in ovariectomized sheep. J Orthop Trauma 19:23–28; erratum in J Orthop Trauma 19:297, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Haas R, Donath K, Fodinger M, Watzek G (1998). Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 9:107–116.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Haas R, Baron M, Donath K, Zechner W, Watzek G (2002). Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:337–346.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hildebolt CF, Pilgram TK, Dotson M, Armamento-Villareal R, Hauser J, Cohen S, et al. (2004). Estrogen and/or calcium plus vitamin D increase mandibular bone mass. J Periodontol 75:811–816.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hildebrand T, Ruegsegger P (1997). Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1:15–23.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Holick MF (2007). Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 357:266–281.[Free Full Text]
  • Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, Gahleitner A, Nowotny R, Bergmann H (2001). Local calibrated bone mineral density in the mandible presented using a color coding scheme. Med Eng Phys 23:673–677.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hovorakova M, Lesot H, Peterka M, Peterkova R (2005). The developmental relationship between the deciduous dentition and the oral vestibule in human embryos. Anat Embryol (Berl) 209:303–313.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Johnson RB, Gilbert JA, Cooper RC, Parsell DE, Stewart BA, Dai X, et al. (2002). Effect of estrogen deficiency on skeletal and alveolar bone density in sheep. J Periodontol 73:383–391.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lill CA, Gerlach UV, Eckhardt C, Goldhahn J, Schneider E (2002a). Bone changes due to glucocorticoid application in an ovariectomized animal model for fracture treatment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:407–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lill CA, Fluegel AK, Schneider E (2002b). Effect of ovariectomy, malnutrition and glucocorticoid application on bone properties in sheep: a pilot study. Osteoporos Int 13:480–486.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lindh C, Obrant K, Petersson A (2004). Maxillary bone mineral density and its relationship to the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and hip. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:102–109.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R (2001). Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:423–432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mavropoulos A, Rizzoli R, Ammann P (2007). Different responsiveness of alveolar and tibial bone to bone loss stimuli. J Bone Miner Res 22:403–410.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Molly L (2006). Bone density and primary stability in implant therapy. Clin Oral Implants Res 17(Suppl 2):124–135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Raisz LG (2005). Clinical practice. Screening for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 353:164–171.[Free Full Text]
  • Reddi AH (1975). The matrix of rat calvarium as transformant of fibroblasts. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 150:324–326.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1995). The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17(5 Suppl):505S–511S.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sambrook P, Cooper C (2006). Osteoporosis. Lancet 367:2010–2018.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sigrist IM, Gerhardt C, Alini M, Schneider E, Egermann M (2007). The long-term effects of ovariectomy on bone metabolism in sheep. J Bone Miner Metab 25:28–35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stoppie N, Pattijn V, Van Cleynenbreugel T, Wevers M, Vander Sloten J, Ignace N (2006). Structural and radiological parameters for the characterization of jawbone. Clin Oral Implants Res 17:124–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thomason JJ, Grovum LE, Deswysen AG, Bignell WW (2001). In vivo surface strain and stereology of the frontal and maxillary bones of sheep: implications for the structural design of the mammalian skull. Anat Rec 264:325–338.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tucker A, Sharpe P (2004). The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nat Rev Genet 5:499–508.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ulm CW, Kneissel M, Hahn M, Solar P, Matejka M, Donath K (1997). Characteristics of the cancellous bone of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:125–130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, Solar P, Matejka M, Schneider B, et al. (1999). Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:459–467.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • von Wowern N (2001). General and oral aspects of osteoporosis: a review. Clin Oral Investig 5:71–82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • von Wowern N, Worsaae N (1988). Bone mineral content of the maxilla estimated by dual-photon absorptiometry after augmentation with bone or hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 67:1405–1408.
  • von Wowern N, Klausen B, Olgaard K (1992). Steroid-induced mandibular bone loss in relation to marginal periodontal changes. J Clin Periodontol 19:182–186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 9, 866-870 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700918


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dvorak, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haas, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?