|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Regulates Cranial Base Development and Growth
M. Nagayama1,2,
M. Iwamoto1,
A. Hargett1,
N. Kamiya3,
Y. Tamamura1,
B. Young1,
T. Morrison1,
H. Takeuchi2,
M. Pacifici1,
M. Enomoto-Iwamoto1 and
E. Koyama1,*
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA;
2 Department of Oral Pathology, Asahi University School of Dentistry, Mizuho, Gifu, 501-0296 Japan; and
3 Laboratory of Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
Correspondence: * corresponding author, moto{at}dent.asahi-u.ac.jp, eiki.koyama{at}jefferson.edu
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Wnt proteins and β-catenin signaling regulate major processes during embryonic development, and we hypothesized that they regulate cranial base synchondrosis development and growth. To address this issue, we analyzed cartilage-specific β-catenin-deficient mice. Mutant synchondroses lacked typical growth plate zones, and endochondral ossification was delayed. In reciprocal transgenic experiments, cartilage overexpression of a constitutive active Lef1, a transcriptional mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, caused precocious chondrocyte hypertrophy and intermingling of immature and mature chondrocytes. The developmental changes seen in β-catenin-deficient synchondroses were accompanied by marked reductions in Ihh and PTHrP as well as sFRP-1, an endogenous Wnt signaling antagonist and a potential Ihh signaling target. Thus, Wnt/β-catenin signaling is essential for cranial base development and synchondrosis growth plate function. This pathway promotes chondrocyte maturation and ossification events, and may exert this important role by dampening the effects of Ihh-PTHrP together with sFRP-1.
Key Words: cranial base synchondrosis Wnt/β-catenin sFRP-1 PTHrP hedgehog signaling
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The cranial base is formed through endochondral ossification and functions as a growth center of the neurocranium. Its central region derives from prechordal, hypophyseal, and parachordal cartilaginous plates that fuse initially to form an uninterrupted cartilaginous structure early in embryogenesis (Thorogood, 1988; Sperber, 2001). Primary ossification centers then emerge, and the cartilaginous segments persisting between the ossification centers represent the synchondroses (Kjaer, 1990; Lieberman and McCarthy, 1999). The synchondroses consist of mirror-image growth plates that display a central reserve zone and zones of chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophy, and are associated with endochondral and intramembranous bone formation. Given their orientation and location, the synchondroses contribute significantly to anterior-posterior cranial base elongation and overall organization and function (Ingervall and Thilander, 1972; Roberts and Blackwood, 1983; Mooney et al., 1993).
Wnt proteins regulate several developmental processes (Nusse and Varmus, 1992). Wnt proteins act by binding to Frizzled and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related receptors on the cell surface, and transduce signals by the highly conserved canonical β-catenin-LEF/TCF pathway (Eastman and Grosschedl, 1999; Huelsken and Birchmeier, 2001) or other pathways (Miller et al., 1999; Veeman et al., 2003). Studies of roles of Wnt signaling in skeletogenesis have shown that Wnt-4, Wnt-5a, Wnt-9a, and Wnt-11 regulate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation (Hartmann and Tabin, 2001; Church et al., 2002; Spater et al., 2006). We and others have found that the canonical pathway plays dual roles in limb skeletogenesis, where it dampens chondrogenic cell differentiation, but promotes chondrocyte maturation and hypertrophy (Enomoto-Iwamoto et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2003; Day et al., 2005; Tamamura et al., 2005). The canonical pathway is also required for osteogenesis, together with Indian hedgehog (Ihh) signaling (Long et al., 2004; Hill et al., 2005; Hu et al., 2005; Rodda and McMahon, 2006). Wnt antagonist-secreted frizzled-related protein-1 (sFRP-1) is an important negative regulator of Wnt signaling for chondrocyte differentiation and osteogenesis (Wang et al., 2005). Wnt/β-catenin signaling may also have roles in craniofacial skeletal development, as suggested by the phenotype of β-catenin-deficient embryos and cells (Brault et al., 2001; Day et al., 2005).
We conducted the present study to determine whether the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway specifically regulates growth plate function in mouse cranial base synchondroses. To do so, we used a genetic approach and analyzed mouse embryos conditionally deficient in β-catenin or expressing a constitutive-active form of Lef-1 (CA-LEF1) in developing cartilage.
 |
MATERIALS & METHODS
|
|---|
Generation of Conditional β-catenin Ablation and Transgenic Mice
Animal protocols were approved by the IACUC. Mice conditionally deficient in β-catenin were created by mating β-catenin floxed mice (β-cateninfl/fl) possessing loxP sites in introns 1 and 6 of the β-catenin gene (6.129-Ctnnb1tmKem/KnwJ line, purchased from the Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) with Col2a1-Cre mice (kindly provided by Dr. Y. Yamada, NIDCR, Bethesda, MD, USA). Genotyping was performed by PCR with the following primers: fl-β-catenin forward, 5'-AAGGTAGAGTGAT GAAAGTTGTT-3'; fl-β-catenin reverse, 5'-CACCATGTCCTCTGTC TATTC-3'; Cre- forward, 5'-AGACGGAAATCCATCGCTCG-3'; and Cre-reverse, 5'-CCACGACC AAGTGACAGCAATG-3'. To verify Cre specificity, we mated Col2a1-Cre mice with ROSA Cre reporter (R26R) mice and evaluated them for LacZ activity at E15.5 and E17.5 by histochemistry. In total, over 10 wild-type and mutant cranial bases were studied microscopically, and statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukeys post hoc comparisons. Mice expressing CA-LEF-1 were prepared as described previously (Tamamura et al., 2005).
Micro-computed Tomography
Skulls fixed in cold 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C were subjected to micro-computed tomography (µCT) in a µCT40 SCANCO Medical system (Southeastern, PA, USA), with a 36-mm holder at 45 kvolts of energy, 12 µm scanning thickness, and medium resolution (Koyama et al., 2007).
X-gal Staining
TOPGAL mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (DasGupta and Fuchs, 1999). E18.5 head samples were fixed with 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 1xPBS for 10 min, washed in 1xPBS, transferred into freshly prepared X-Gal solution (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA, USA), incubated at 37°C for 4 hrs, and processed for histological analyses.
Gene Expression Analysis
In situ hybridization and mouse cDNA probes were used as described previously (Shibukawa et al., 2007) and included: histone H4C (nt. 549-799; AY158963); parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) (nt. 66-1386; NM_008970); osteopontin (nt. 1-267; AF515708); Osterix (nt. 40-1727; NM_130458); Indian hedgehog (Ihh) (nt. 897-1954; MN_010544); Patched-1 (nt. 81-841; NM_008957); Mmp13 (nt. 11-744; NM_008607); collagen X (nt. 1302-1816; NM009925); sFRP1 (full-length; NM_013834); and collagen II (nt. 1095-1344; X57982).
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Cranial Base and Synchondrosis Abnormalities in β-catenin-deficient Mice
First we compared the cranial bases in E17.5 β-catnfl/fl;Col2 1-Cre embryos (heretofore termed β-catenin-deficient) and β-catnfl/wt;Col2a1-Cre and β-catnfl/fl embryos (control) by anatomical inspection and µCT. Control cranial bases displayed a typical elongated morphology, and their pre-sphenoidal (ps), basi-sphenoidal (bs), and basi-occipital (bo) bones and their intrasphenoidal (is) and spheno-occipital (so) synchondroses were also well-defined (Fig. 1A ). Histochemistry showed the E17.5 cranial base bone anlagen to be ossified and stained with alizarin red (Figs. 1B, 1C ). In contrast, the cranial bases in β-catenin-deficient littermates remained largely cartilaginous (Figs. 1K, 1L ), and bone formation of the cranial base was poor, as revealed by µCT (Fig. 1J ) and alizarin red staining (Fig. 1L ). In addition, the antero-posterior length of pre-sphenoidal and basi-sphenoidal bones was about 20–25% shorter in mutants than in controls (Figs. 1C, 1L ; solid horizontal bar; p < 0.05), while occipital bone length was not markedly affected (Figs. 1C, 1L ; dashed horizontal bar). These changes likely contributed to the significant overall antero-posterior shortening of mutant cranial bases.

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Growth plate organization and endochondral and perichondrial bone formation are defective in β-catenin-deficient cranial bases and synchondroses. Skulls from E17.5 control (β-cateninfl/fl; A) and β-catenin-deficient (β-cateninfl/fl;Col2al-Cre; J) mice were analyzed by micro-computed tomography (µCT) and are shown in a birds-eye view. The locations of intrasphenoidal (is) and spheno-occipital (so) synchondroses, and pre-sphenoidal (ps), basi-sphenoidal (bs), and basi-occipital (bo) bones are indicated in control (A–B). Parasagittal hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of control (B) and β-catenin-deficient (K) cranial bases at E17.5. Alizarin-red-stained sections of control (C) and β-catenin-deficient (L) specimens. Note that the resting (rz), proliferative (pr), pre-hypertrophic (phz), and hypertrophic (hz) growth plate zones in control (G) are markedly abnormal in mutant synchondroses (P). The distance between pre-sphenoidal and basi-sphenoidal bones (L, indicated by a solid line) is much shorter than that in control (C, indicated by a solid line). Serial sections of the medial portion of E17.5 control (D–F, H–I) and β-catenin-deficient (M–O, Q–R) cranial bases were processed for in situ hybridization, for analysis of intrasphenoidal and spheno-occipital synchondrosis growth plates and associated endochondral and perichondrial bone formation. (S) Synchondrosis growth plate sections from E18.5 TOPGAL embryos were processed for β-galactosidase staining. Scale bars: 2.5 mm in J for A, J; 1 mm in O for B–F and K–O; and 60 µm in R for G–I and P–R.
|
|
Growth Plate Organization and Gene Expression in β-catenin-deficient Synchondroses
Control E17.5 growth plates displayed a characteristic histology and organization (Fig. 1G ), with a resting zone with small chondrocytes (rz), a proliferative zone with flat chondrocytes (pz), pre-hypertrophic and hypertrophic zones with columnar chondrocytes (phz and hz), and primary bone spongiosa and marrow. Transcripts for cartilage-characteristic collagen II were present in most zones (Fig. 1D ), collagen X transcripts were in the hypertrophic zone (Fig. 1E ), and metalloprotease 13 (Mmp-13) transcripts were in the post-hypertrophic zone and bone and marrow cells (Fig. 1F ). In contrast, E17.5 β-catenin-deficient growth plates lacked well-defined zones and contained round-to-oval chondrocytes broadly distributed along the entire cranial base (Fig. 1P ). Collagen II transcripts were as broadly distributed (Fig. 1M ), and collagen X and Mmp-13 transcripts characterized pockets of maturing and hypertrophic chondrocytes (Figs. 1N, 1O ). A periosteal bone collar normally forms in tissues flanking the pre-hypertrophic/hypertrophic zones of growth plates and is induced by Ihh (Koyama et al., 1996; Nakamura et al., 1997; St-Jacques et al., 1999). In good agreement, both collagen I (an abundant bone matrix component) and osterix (a bone master regulator) were strongly expressed by the thick perichondrial tissues flanking control spheno-occipital synchondroses (Figs. 1G–1I , arrowheads). However, both markers and ensuing perichondrial bone formation were reduced in β-catenin-deficient synchondroses (Figs. 1P–1R , arrowheads), and this failure was associated with a significant thinning of perichondrial tissues (Fig. 1P , arrowhead). To verify that Wnt/β-catenin signaling was active in developing synchondroses, we used Wnt/β-catenin LacZ-reporter mice and found that reporter activity was mostly appreciable in pre-hypertrophic and hypertrophic zones (Fig. 1S ), and that there was also some activity in perichondrial cells (Fig. 1S , arrowheads).
Accelerated Chondrocyte Maturation in CA-LEF1 Transgenic Mice
Next, we examined transgenic mice expressing CA-LEF1 in chondrocytes that elicits constitutive Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Tamamura et al., 2005). Transgenic synchondroses exhibited excessive and widespread chondrocyte maturation and hypertrophy and endochondral ossification, albeit in a topographically abnormal fashion (Figs. 2A–2C ). The relatively few immature chondrocytes located in remnants of intrasphenoidal synchondrosis expressed collagen II (Fig. 2D ), but most tissue was occupied by chondrocytes expressing the hypertrophic marker collagen X (Fig. 2E ), and the endochondral bone areas expressed the post-hypertrophic/bone marker osteopontin (Fig. 2F ). In addition, the thick perichondrial tissues underwent excessive ossification, as revealed by an abundance of collagen I and osterix transcripts (Figs. 2K–2M ) compared with those in wild-type mice (Figs. 2H–2J ).

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Constitutive activation of β-catenin signaling causes cranial base abnormalities. (A) Parasagittal sections of CA-LEF1 cranial bases at E17.5 were stained with H&E, and the locations of intrasphenoidal (is) and spheno-occipital (so) synchondroses are indicated. (B,C) Boxed areas in A are shown at higher magnification. Serial sections from E17.5 CA-LEF1 (D–F, L–M) and wild-type (I–J) cranial bases were processed for in situ hybridization analysis of indicated genes during endochondral (D–F) and perichondrial bone formation (I,J and L,M). (G) Alizarin-red-stained sections of a CA-LEF1 embryo displayed the presence of ectopic (arrowhead) and intermingling (double arrowhead) mineralized tissue in intrasphenoidal (is) and spheno-occipital (so) synchondroses. Scale bars: 1 mm in A for A and D–G; 45 µm in B for B–C; and 55 µm in H for H–M.
|
|
Altered Hedgehog and Wnt Signaling Patterns in β-catenin-deficient Synchondroses
We next focused our attention on the Ihh-PTHrP signaling axis. In controls, Ihh was expressed in the pre-hypertrophic zone (phz) (Figs. 3A, 3B ), and PTHrP in resting and proliferative zones (Fig. 3D ). Patched-1 was expressed in the proliferative zone (Fig. 3C , arrows), identifiable by the mitotic marker histone 4C expression (Fig. 3E , arrows), as well as in perichondrial tissues flanking pre-hypertrophic and hypertrophic zones, where perichondrial ossification initiates (Fig. 3C , arrowheads). Notably, endogenous β-catenin transcripts were most evident in proliferative zones and also in perichondrial tissues adjacent to pre-hypertrophic/hypertrophic zones (Fig. 3F , arrowheads). This pattern was virtually super-imposable onto that of Patched-1 (Fig. 3C ), suggesting that both Patched-1 and β-catenin are expressed in Ihh target cells. In other systems, the Wnt signaling antagonist sFRP-1 is up-regulated in hedgehog target cells and represents a transcriptional target of hedgehog signaling (Wang et al., 2005; He et al., 2006). In good agreement, sFRP-1 transcripts were obvious in resting and proliferating zones (Fig. 3G ) and were abundant along the perichondrial tissues (Fig. 3G , arrowheads).

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. Hedgehog and Wnt signaling is altered in β-catenin-deficient synchondroses. Serial sections of E17.5 control (A–G), β-catenin-deficient (H–N), and Ihh-deficient (O–U) spheno-occipital synchondroses were processed for gene expression analysis of indicated molecules. In controls, Patched 1 (C) and β-catenin (F) were expressed in the proliferative zone (pz; single arrows) and perichondrium (arrowheads) flanking the Ihh-expressing pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes (B), and PTHrP (D) and sFRP1 (G) were prominent in resting zone chondrocytes (rz). Note that in β-catenin-deficient synchondroses, the significant reduction of Ihh expression (I) was accompanied by reduced expression of Patched 1 (J), PTHrP (K), and sFRP1 (N). Note also that in Ihh–/–synchondroses, expression of PTHrP (R), β-catenin (T), and sFRP1 (U) was significantly reduced. Scale bar: 120 µm in O for A–U.
|
|
In β-catenin-deficient synchondroses, expression of Ihh, Patched-1, and PTHrP was low and scattered (Figs. 3I–3K ), as were histone H4C-positive proliferating chondrocytes (Fig. 3L ). β-catenin expression was markedly reduced within the growth plate, attesting to the effectiveness of Col2a1-Cre (Fig. 3M ), but was also much lower in the perichondrium/periosteum, possibly reflecting diminished local Ihh signaling activity. In line with this possibility, we observed only residual sFRP-1 expression scattered throughout cartilaginous tissue and adjacent perichondrium (Fig. 3N ).
Given the above results, one would predict that Wnt signaling and related molecules should not be expressed in mutant synchondroses lacking Ihh. Indeed, in E17.5 Ihh–/–synchondroses, β-catenin gene expression was very low and broad (Fig. 3T ), as was sFRP-1 expression (Fig. 3U ). These changes were associated with expected growth plate disorganization with random chondrocyte proliferation (Figs. 3O, 3S ), nearly absent PTHrP and Patched-1 expression (Figs. 3R, 3Q ), and broad and random chondrocyte maturation.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
In this study, we provide evidence that the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays important roles in cranial base synchondrosis development, growth, and function. Deficiency in β-catenin expression in cartilage caused serious defects in chondrocyte proliferation, hypertrophy, and endochondral ossification. Most of the targeted chondrocytes remained small and round, which is characteristic of resting chondrocytes, and failed to become organized in typical growth plate zones. In addition, the β-catenin-deficient growth plates lacked a thick and multilayered perichondrial/periosteal tissue, where osteoprogenitor cells and vascular endothelial cells normally reside. The presence of such altered tissue is associated with, and may have caused, failure of bone collar formation. In reciprocally manipulated synchondroses in which Wnt/β-catenin signaling was constitutively active, chondrocytes underwent precocious maturation and hypertrophy, albeit topographically disorganized, that resulted in intermingling of chondrocytes at different stages of maturation; there was also excessive bone collar formation all along the growth plate flank. Analysis of the data, together, indicates that the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates chondrocyte behavior and function in developing synchondroses, and that a tight regulation of this signaling pathway activity is needed for, and facilitates, a normal progression of the chondrocyte maturation process and physiologic synchondrosis function.
The synchondrosis growth plates contain distinct zones of chondrocyte maturation and act as the growth centers for cranial bone elongation and expansion during embryonic and post-natal life. As pointed out above, a well-recognized mechanism of growth plate function studied in developing long bones is the PTHrP-Ihh axis, in which Ihh signaling regulates PTHrP expression in peri-articular tissues, and, in turn, PTHrP regulates the rates of chondrocyte proliferation and maturation (Lanske et al., 1996). Recently, we reported that Ihh gene ablation in mouse embryos causes down-regulation of PTHrP expression in the synchondrosis resting zone, reduces chondrocyte proliferation, and leads to widespread hypertrophy, suggesting that the PTHrP-Ihh axis has roles in synchondroses as well (Young et al., 2006). Analysis of the data presented here reaffirms this conclusion, and also shows that functioning of this regulatory axis relies on Wnt/β-catenin signaling. The β-catenin-deficient synchondrosis chondrocytes exhibit poor and deficient expression of PTHrP, Patched-1, and sFRP-1. Since the latter two factors are targets of hedgehog signaling, analysis of the data implies that hedgehog signaling and action are impaired in β-catenin-deficient synchondroses. Analysis of these data also indicates that canonical Wnt signaling has pleiotropic roles in growth plate function, regulates and coordinates a multiplicity of key events, and may do so via interactions with, and modulation of, the PTHrP-Ihh axis. It should be noted here that the phenotype of β-catenin-deficient synchondrosis growth plates is more severe in terms of defects of ossification and gene expression than that of β-catenin-deficient long bones (Day et al., 2005). It is not clear at the moment whether this reflects a greater reliance of synchondrosis growth plates on Wnt/β-catenin signaling and PTHrP-Ihh axis.
One of the most salient observations in our study was the considerable accumulation of immature, small, and collagen II-expressing chondrocytes that occupied the bulk of the β-catenin deficient synchondroses. This is in sharp contrast to the situation in CA-LEF transgenic or Ihh–/– synchondroses. Analysis of the data reaffirms the concept that normal organization of growth plates and rates and topology of the chondrocyte maturation process are maintained by fine balances among mechanisms with opposing effects—that is, mechanisms that favor and mechanisms that oppose the unfolding of this process. Chief among known mechanisms that dampen the rate of chondrocyte maturation is the PTHrP-Ihh axis itself (Lanske et al., 1996). Interestingly, however, both the retardation of chondrocyte maturation seen in the β-catenin-deficient synchondroses and the acceleration seen in the Ihh–/– synchondroses are accompanied by a marked decrease in PTHrP expression, signifying that the PTHrP-Ihh axis alone cannot account for both phenotypes, and that other, more complex, mechanisms must be invoked.
Accordingly, then, we propose the following model (Fig. 4 ). In wild-type synchondroses, growth plate structure and function would be maintained by the concerted action of, and interactions among, Wnt/β-catenin, sFRP-1, PTHrP, and Ihh. Ihh would induce both PTHrP and sFRP-1 in resting and proliferating zones. In turn, sFRP-1 would limit, but not abrogate, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, helping the local chondrocytes to maintain their resting and proliferating status, and preventing their precocious maturation and hypertrophy. The chondrocytes would eventually transit and progress into the pre-hypertrophic zone, where increasing levels of Wnt/β-catenin signaling would favor maturation, hypertrophy, and ossification (Fig. 4A ). This dynamic balance would be destroyed by β-catenin deficiency (Fig. 4B ). The consequent decrease in Wnt signaling would shift the balance in favor of PTHrP and Ihh, and the residual expression of these factors in the β-catenin-deficient growth plates would be sufficient to delay maturation and ossification. In the Ihh–/– synchondroses, the opposite would occur (Fig. 4C ). Absence of Ihh (and the consequent very low levels of PTHrP and sFRP) would tilt the balance in favor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which would be sufficient to trigger precocious chondrocyte maturation and widespread ossification.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Model illustrating the phenotypic consequence of β-catenin and Ihh deficiency. (A) In wild-type synchondroses, PTHrP and sFRP1 induced by Ihh in the resting and proliferating zones would limit Wnt/β-catenin signaling in resident chondrocytes, establishing normal rates of chondrocyte development and maturation. (B) In β-catenin-deficient synchondroses, low, but widely expressed, PTHrP and sFRP1 would attenuate Wnt/β-catenin signaling throughout the growth plate, resulting in delayed synchondrosis development. (C) In Ihh–/–synchondroses, Wnt/β-catenin signaling would be widespread and would accelerate chondrocyte maturation, together with extremely low PTHrP and sFRP1 levels.
|
|
These exciting and plausible scenarios are being tested in ongoing studies.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We express our gratitude to Dr. Y. Yamada for the Col2a1-Cre mice. This work was supported by NIH grants.
Received for publication July 5, 2007.
Revision received October 30, 2007.
Accepted for publication November 27, 2007.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Brault V, Moore R, Kutsch S, Ishibashi M, Rowitch DH, McMahon AP, et al. (2001). Inactivation of the beta-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development 128:1253–1264.[Abstract]
- Church V, Nohno T, Linker C, Marcelle C, Francis-West P (2002). Wnt regulation of chondrocyte differentiation. J Cell Sci 115:4809–4818.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- DasGupta R, Fuchs E (1999). Multiple roles for activated LEF/TCF transcription complexes during hair follicle development and differentiation. Development 126:4557–4568.[Abstract]
- Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, Yang Y (2005). Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev Cell 8:739–750.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Eastman Q, Grosschedl R (1999). Regulation of LEF-1/TCF transcription factors by Wnt and other signals. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11:233–240.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Kitagaki J, Koyama E, Tamamura Y, Wu C, Kanatani N, et al. (2002). The Wnt antagonist Frzb-1 regulates chondrocyte maturation and long bone development during limb skeletogenesis. Dev Biol 251:142–156.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gaur T, Rich L, Lengner CJ, Hussain S, Trevant B, Ayers D, et al. (2006). Secreted frizzled related protein 1 regulates Wnt signaling for BMP2 induced chondrocyte differentiation. J Cell Physiol 208:87–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hartmann C, Tabin CJ (2001). Wnt-14 plays a pivotal role in inducing synovial joint formation in the developing appendicular skeleton. Cell 104:341–351.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- He J, Sheng T, Stelter AA, Li C, Zhang X, Sinha M, et al. (2006). Suppressing Wnt signaling by the hedgehog pathway through sFRP-1. J Biol Chem 281:35598–35602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hill TP, Spater D, Taketo MM, Birchmeier W, Hartmann C (2005). Canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev Cell 8:727–738.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hu H, Hilton MJ, Tu X, Yu K, Ornitz DM, Long F (2005). Sequential roles of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling in osteoblast development. Development 132:49–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Huelsken J, Birchmeier W (2001). New aspects of Wnt signaling pathways in higher vertebrates. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11:547–553.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ingervall B, Thilander B (1972). The human spheno-occipital synchondrosis. I. The time of closure appraised macroscopically. Acta Odontol Scand 30:349–356.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kjaer I (1990). Radiographic determination of prenatal basicranial ossification. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 10:113–123.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koyama E, Leatherman JL, Noji S, Pacifici M (1996). Early chick limb cartilaginous elements possess polarizing activity and express Hedgehog-related morphogenetic factors. Dev Dyn 207:344–354.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koyama E, Young B, Nagayama M, Shibukawa Y, Enomoto-Iwamoto M, Iwamoto M, et al. (2007). Conditional Kif3a ablation causes abnormal hedgehog signaling topography, growth plate dysfunction, and excessive bone and cartilage formation during mouse skeletogenesis. Development 134:2159–2169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lanske B, Karaplis AC, Lee K, Luz A, Vortkamp A, Pirro A, et al. (1996). PTH/PTHrP receptor in early development and Indian hedgehog-regulated bone growth. Science 273:663–666.[Abstract]
- Lieberman DE, McCarthy RC (1999). The ontogeny of cranial base angulation in humans and chimpanzees and its implications for reconstructing pharyngeal dimensions. J Hum Evol 36:487–517.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Long F, Chung UI, Ohba S, McMahon J, Kronenberg HM, McMahon AP (2004). Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development 131:1309–1318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miller JR, Hocking AM, Brown JD, Moon RT (1999). Mechanism and function of signal transduction by the Wnt/beta-catenin and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways. Oncogene 18:7860–7872.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mooney MP, Losken HW, Tschakaloff A, Siegel MI, Losken A, Lalikos JF (1993). Congenital bilateral coronal suture synostosis in a rabbit and craniofacial growth comparisons with experimental models. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30:121–128.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nakamura T, Aikawa T, Iwamoto-Enomoto M, Iwamoto M, Higuchi Y, Pacifici M, et al. (1997). Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237:465–469; erratum in Biochem Biophys Res Commun 247:910, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nusse R, Varmus HE (1992). Wnt genes. Cell 69:1073–1087.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Roberts GJ, Blackwood HJ (1983). Growth of the cartilages of the mid-line cranial base: a radiographic and histological study. J Anat 136:307–320.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rodda SJ, McMahon AP (2006). Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development 133:3231–3244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shibukawa Y, Young B, Wu C, Yamada S, Long F, Pacifici M, et al. (2007). Temporomandibular joint formation and condyle growth require Indian hedgehog signaling. Dev Dyn 236:426–434.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Spater D, Hill TP, OSullivan RJ, Gruber M, Conner DA, Hartmann C (2006). Wnt9a signaling is required for joint integrity and regulation of Ihh during chondrogenesis. Development 133:3039–3049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sperber GH (2001). Cranial base. In: Craniofacial development. Hamilton, Canada: B.C. Decker, pp. 89–101.
- St-Jacques B, Hammerschmidt M, McMahon AP (1999). Indian hedgehog signaling regulates proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and is essential for bone formation. Genes Dev 13:2072–2086; erratum in Genes Dev 13:2617, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tamamura Y, Otani T, Kanatani N, Koyama E, Kitagaki J, Komori T, et al. (2005). Developmental regulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signals is required for growth plate assembly, cartilage integrity, and endochondral ossification. J Biol Chem 280:19185–19195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thorogood P (1988). The developmental specification of the vertebrate skull. Development 103(Suppl):141–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Veeman MT, Axelrod JD, Moon RT (2003). A second canon. Functions and mechanisms of beta-catenin-independent Wnt signaling. Dev Cell 5:367–377.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wang FS, Lin CL, Chen YJ, Wang CJ, Yang KD, Huang YT, et al. (2005). Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 modulates glucocorticoid attenuation of osteogenic activities and bone mass. Endocrinology 146:2415–2423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J (2003). Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 130:1003–1015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Young B, Minugh-Purvis N, Shimo T, St-Jacques B, Iwamoto M, Enomoto-Iwamoto M, et al. (2006). Indian and sonic hedgehogs regulate synchondrosis growth plate and cranial base development and function. Dev Biol 299:272–282.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 3,
244-249 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700309

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ochiai, M. Nagayama, T. Nakamura, T. Morrison, D. Pilchak, N. Kondo, H. Hasegawa, B. Song, R. Serra, M. Pacifici, et al.
Roles of the Primary Cilium Component Polaris in Synchondrosis Development
Journal of Dental Research,
June 1, 2009;
88(6):
545 - 550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|