Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snider, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Detamore, M.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snider, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Detamore, M.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Regional Dynamic Tensile Properties of the TMJ Disc

G.R. Snider, J. Lomakin, M. Singh, S.H. Gehrke and M.S. Detamore*

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., Room 4132, Lawrence, KS 66045-7609, USA

Correspondence: * corresponding author, detamore{at}ku.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although the TMJ disc has been well-characterized under tension and compression, dynamic viscoelastic regional and directional variations have heretofore not been investigated. We hypothesized that the intermediate zone under mediolateral tension would exhibit lower dynamic moduli compared with the other regions of the disc under either mediolateral or anteroposterior tension. Specimens were prepared from porcine discs (3 regions/direction), and dynamic tensile sweeps were performed at 1% strain over a frequency range of 0.1 to 100 rad/sec. Generally, the intermediate zone possessed the lowest storage and loss moduli, and the highest loss tangent. This study further accentuates the known distinct character of the intermediate zone by showing for the first time that these differences also extend to dynamic behavior, perhaps implicating the TMJ disc as a structure primarily exposed to predominantly anteroposterior tension via anterior and posterior attachments, with a need for great distension mediolaterally across the intermediate zone.

Key Words: temporomandibular joint disc • dynamic • viscoelasticity • biomechanics


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc experiences static loading during clenching, grinding, and bruxism, and dynamic loading during talking and chewing (Kuboki et al., 1997; Beatty et al., 2001; Tanaka and van Eijden, 2003). Biomechanical characterization of the TMJ disc is essential to the development of a tissue-engineered replacement disc, and is necessary for finite element modeling. Finite element models of the disc characterize compressive, tensile, and shear forces during mandibular motion (Beek et al., 2000; Koolstra, 2003; Donzelli et al., 2004; Tanaka et al., 2004a), and may be able to address questions of pressing clinical significance in the future (Detamore et al., 2007).

As a viscoelastic material, the disc exhibits a time-dependent stress-strain response. The TMJ disc exhibits distinct regional variations, leading to commonly defined regions (Rees, 1954). The disc is heterogeneous and anisotropic, with the greatest structural and functional regional distinction being between (1) the intermediate zone and (2) the anterior and posterior bands (Detamore et al., 2005). Variations of compressive properties and tensile properties do not correspond to each other, due to both the differing structural factors contributing to compressive and tensile integrity and to the different axes for tensile (anteroposterior or mediolateral) and compressive (supero-inferior) testing.

Single-deformation (as opposed to dynamic) tensile testing of the disc has elucidated the dramatic differences in tensile behavior among regions in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions, which can be attributed to heterogeneous and anisotropic orientation of collagen fibers (Teng and Xu, 1991; Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003; Scapino et al., 2006). Dynamic loading has been investigated with regard to shear, compressive, and tensile stress (Beek et al., 2001; Tanaka et al., 2002, 2003a, Tanaka et al., b,d, 2004b; Beatty et al., 2003; Koolstra et al., 2007). The current study focused specifically on the dynamic tensile properties of the TMJ disc under dynamic tension.

Previous dynamic tensile studies of the TMJ disc have examined the effects of age-related changes (Tanaka et al., 2002), proteoglycan content (Tanaka et al., 2003a), and impulsive compression prior to tension (Tanaka et al., 2003c), all in the anteroposterior direction. The purpose of this study was to analyze the dynamic uni-axial tensile properties of the porcine TMJ disc, examining for the first time its regional and directional differences in dynamic behavior. Pigs were selected based on the similarity of their TMJ to the human TMJ (Herring, 2003) and recommended use for TMJ tissue biomechanics studies (Detamore et al., 2007). Based on previous single-deformation studies that compared the intermediate zone with other regions in tension (Teng et al., 1991; Beatty et al., 2001; Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003;), we hypothesized that the intermediate zone would have lower dynamic moduli in comparison with the other regions of the disc.


    MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Specimen Preparation
TMJ discs were dissected from pig heads (Yorkshire cross, female, weighting 70–85 kg each) obtained at a local slaughterhouse. Discs were harvested within 24 hrs of death, wrapped in gauze, soaked in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS – 0.138 M sodium chloride, 0.0027 M potassium chloride), and stored at –20°C. Left and right discs from 6 pigs were obtained (n = 6 for each of the 6 regions). From each left disc, 3 specimens were made in the mediolateral direction (Fig. 1Go). These specimens comprised the anterior and posterior bands, and the intermediate zone. From each right disc, 3 specimens (medial, lateral, and central regions) were made in the anteroposterior direction (Fig. 1Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Superior view of a right porcine TMJ disc. Specimens were obtained in the mediolateral direction (shading = //) from the anterior region, the intermediate zone, and the posterior region. Specimens were obtained in the anteroposterior direction (shading = \\) from the medial region, the central region, and the lateral region.

 
TMJ discs were thawed and then cut into 500-µm-thick sections by means of a cryotome (Microm HM550, Richard-Allan Scientific, Kalamazoo, MI, USA). To obtain uniform sections from a consistent location, we marked the superior surface of each dissected disc with India ink. The tissue was frozen such that the superior surface was flat, and then it was placed on a stage and covered in embedding medium. We made a series of 10-µm sections from the superior surface of the specimen until the ink was removed, and then made a 500-µm cut to obtain the disc section. We removed the surface to test the internal architecture immediately below the superior surface, which has a documented collagen fiber architecture (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003; Scapino et al., 2006) crucial to tensile behavior. It was anticipated that removal of the surface zone may result in indeterminate changes in storage and loss moduli. From the 500-µm section, the disc was divided into its 3 respective regions. Rectangular specimens were made from each region by means of parallel razor blades, uniformly spaced at 2 mm. These specimens were wrapped in gauze, soaked in PBS, then frozen at –20°C until tested (Allen and Athanasiou, 2005).

Dynamic Tensile Tests
Dynamic tensile tests were performed with the Rheometrics RSA III Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Prior to being tested, specimens were conditioned for 20 min in PBS. Specimen dimensions were measured with a micrometer at 25X magnification (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003), and entered into the TA Orchestrator data acquisition and analysis program (TA Instruments). The width and thickness of the specimens were 2.15 ± 0.23 and 0.81 ± 0.19 mm, respectively. The lengths of the specimens were 14.4 ± 3.6 and 8.0 ± 1.6 mm for the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions, respectively.

Waterproof sandpaper was glued to the grip surfaces by cyanoacrylate adhesive to prevent slippage, and caused no damage to the specimen (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003). TMJ disc specimens were fixed in the tensile testing grips, and tests were performed at room temperature in a bath of PBS (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003; Park and Ateshian, 2006) following a 1-g tare load. During the dynamic tensile tests, a strain of 1% was applied to the specimen over a frequency range of 0.1 to 100 rad/sec (preliminary tests with a strain amplitude of 0.1% gave comparable results; absence of pre-strain beyond the tare load provides the lower bound on E' and E'', as indicated by work now under way to measure E' and E'' as a function of pre-strain). To rule out slippage and specimen damage, we conducted several preliminary studies, including confirming independence of the direction of the frequency sweep (high to low vs. low to high). Values for the storage modulus (E'), loss modulus (E''), and loss tangent (tan {delta}) were obtained over this frequency range.

Statistical Analysis
The mean and standard deviation of E', E'', and tan {delta} for each region were calculated at frequencies of 1 and 10 rad/sec. The results of each property for each region were compared at 1 rad/ sec by Fisher’s Protected Least Significant Difference (PLSD) post hoc test when significance was detected by a single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The pooled mediolateral regions (anterior band, intermediate zone, posterior band) and anteroposterior regions (medial, central, lateral) at 1 rad/sec were then compared by, again, a single-factor ANOVA and Fisher’s PLSD post hoc test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In general, storage and loss moduli increased as frequency increased from 0.1 to 10 rad/sec, and began to decrease from 10 to 100 rad/sec (Fig. 2Go). Generally, viscous damping, as measured by the loss tangent, was relatively higher at lower frequencies, and decreased and leveled off by 10 rad/sec (Fig. 3Go). For a frequency of 1 rad/sec, storage moduli ranged from 0.52 MPa in the intermediate zone to 2.9 MPa in the medial region, and loss moduli ranged from 0.075 MPa in the intermediate zone to 0.30 MPa in the medial region (Fig. 4Go). Correspondingly, the loss tangents at a frequency of 1 rad/ sec ranged from 0.10 to 0.15 (Fig. 4Go). At frequencies of 1 rad/ sec and 10 rad/sec, the medial region, followed by the anterior region, exhibited the highest mean values of storage and loss moduli. In contrast, the intermediate zone, followed by the posterior band, exhibited the lowest mean values of storage and loss moduli. At 1 rad/sec, the storage modulus was significantly greater in the medial region than in the intermediate zone (p < 0.005) and posterior band (p < 0.05), and the central region (p = 0.05) and anterior band (p < 0.05) also had larger storage moduli than the intermediate zone.


Figure 2
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Storage moduli (E') and loss moduli (E'') for a frequency sweep from 0.1 to 100 rad/sec. Values were noticeably lower in the intermediate zone across the frequency spectrum. Data are means ± standard deviations, n = 6.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. The loss tangents (tan {delta}) for a frequency sweep from 0.1 to 10 rad/sec (behavior erratic in some cases at higher frequencies due to lower storage moduli). Note that values were consistently higher in the posterior band and intermediate zone across the frequency spectrum. Data are means ± standard deviations, n = 6.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. The storage moduli (E'), loss moduli (E''), and loss tangents (tan {delta}) at 1 rad/sec and 10 rad/sec (mean ± standard deviation, n = 6). *Statistically significant difference compared with the intermediate zone at 1 rad/sec. +Statistically significant difference compared with the posterior band at 1 rad/sec. ANOVA did not detect significant differences for E'' data.

 
The intermediate zone, followed by the posterior zone, exhibited the greatest loss tangents at frequencies of 1 rad/sec and 10 rad/sec, whereas the medial region was found to have the smallest loss tangent (Fig. 4Go). At 1 rad/sec, the loss tangent was significantly higher in the intermediate zone and posterior band relative to the anterior band (p < 0.01), medial region (p < 0.005), and lateral region (p < 0.05).

In pooling the regions in each of the two directions, we found that the respective values in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions at 1 rad/sec were 1.3 ± 1.5 and 2.3 ± 1.3 for the storage modulus (p < 0.05), 0.14 ± 0.13 and 0.25 ± 0.13 for the loss modulus (p < 0.05), and 0.14 ± 0.03 and 0.12 ± 0.02 for the loss tangent (p < 0.05).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In comparison with previous TMJ disc dynamic tensile studies (Tanaka et al., 2002, 2003a,Tanaka et al., c), the removal of the surface in the current study should be noted, and only the anteroposterior central region data can be directly compared. Overall, findings were in close agreement. Loss moduli in this region generally ranged from 0.1 MPa to 0.33 MPa in the current study, comparable with previously reported loss moduli of about 0.07 to 0.25 MPa. Loss tangents ranged from 0.12 to 0.17, compared with a range of 0.1 to 0.25 found previously, indicating a well-cross-linked material with a relatively small amount of viscous damping. Storage moduli in the current study generally ranged from 0.8 to 2.3 MPa, compared with 0.4-2 MPa previously reported. The current study and the studies by Tanaka et al. were all performed in the non-linear low-strain regions of the stress-strain curves (the "toe region"), which extends to ~ 6% tensile strain for the TMJ disc (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003); increasing pre-strains within this region is hypothesized to increase storage and loss moduli (as seen in follow-up studies currently under way), reaching constant values in the linear region of the stress-strain curve.

A decline in the storage modulus was typically observed above ~ 70 rad/sec. The exact frequency where the downturn begins depends on experimental parameters such as the length of the sample between the grips. This is consistent with resonance effects that arise in dynamic mechanical testing (Ferry, 1980; Menard, 1999). Such effects have been observed at similar frequencies in other soft tissues, such as muscle (Wakeling and Nigg, 2001), tendon (Wang et al., 2007), and pericardium (Mavrilas et al., 2005), as well as in hyaluronic acid and collagen gels (Klemuk and Titze, 2004). Data above the downturn frequency were discarded in these cases, since lower-frequency data were not affected by this phenomenon (Menard, 1999; Klemuk and Titze, 2004; Mavrilas et al., 2005). Since the conclusions of this work rest on interpretation of the data below 70 rad/sec, further analysis of this phenomenon is separate from the goals of this report, though its quantitative analysis is under investigation. With regard to the resonance effect, the variation in heterogeneity between the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions may have played a role in determining the degree of storage moduli decrease between these directions.

Based on regional analysis of dynamic tensile moduli and the loss tangent, the intermediate zone was found to have statistically significant differences in properties in comparison with most of the other regions. In general, the intermediate zone was found to have the lowest storage modulus, lowest loss modulus, and highest loss tangent. This indicates that the disc in this region is softer and less cross-linked than elsewhere. Previous studies examining regional variations under static tension have demonstrated that the intermediate zone has a lower modulus than all regions in the mediolateral direction and anteroposterior directions (Teng et al., 1991; Beatty et al., 2001; Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003). The results of the current study underscore this relationship between the intermediate zone and all other regions. Indeed, lower dynamic moduli in the intermediate zone correspond nicely with lower static moduli found in previous studies.

Collagen fibers, which provide the tensile integrity of the disc, run anteroposteriorly in the intermediate zone (Scapino et al., 2006). Thus the fibers provide less resistance in this region than in the anterior and posterior bands of the disc under mediolateral tension, and in all regions under anteroposterior tension, in which fibers are oriented, to a large extent, parallel to the direction of tension. The results indicated that the intermediate zone also had a greater viscous character than the other regions of the disc. It should be noted that the samples representing the posterior band in this study were taken from a position slightly anterior to the location used in a related previous study (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003), which likely resulted in the relatively similar behavior observed between the posterior band and intermediate zone in the current study, as opposed to the striking contrast between the two regions in previous reports (Teng et al., 1991; Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003). Future studies may investigate numerous regions in the mediolateral direction for better characterization of the transition from the behavior of the posterior band to that of the intermediate zone.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to present a multi-regional, multi-directional characterization of the dynamic tensile properties of the TMJ disc. These results help to paint a bigger picture of TMJ disc biomechanics by further elucidating the distinct character of the intermediate zone relative to all other regions of the disc. Under tension, the intermediate zone under mediolateral tension is known to be less stiff, less strong, less tough, and more ductile than the other regions (Teng et al., 1991; Beatty et al., 2001; Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003). The current study has shown not only that the lower stiffness shown in previous studies is also observed in the dynamic moduli, but also that the intermediate zone generally appears to be more viscous. Therefore, although the intermediate zone is more prone to fracture and deformation, it is much more yielding, with a much higher fracture strain and viscous character. These biomechanical property observations collectively stand as a testament to the complex biomechanical environment of the TMJ, perhaps implicating the TMJ disc as a structure primarily exposed to predominantly anteroposterior tension via its anterior and posterior attachments, with a need for great distension mediolaterally across the intermediate zone.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This research was supported by the University of Kansas General Research Fund, and partial support of NSF IOS-0726412 is also acknowledged. We thank the reviewers for helpful comments for improving the manuscript.

Received for publication August 16, 2007. Revision received July 23, 2008. Accepted for publication August 1, 2008.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Allen KD, Athanasiou KA (2005). A surface-regional and freeze-thaw characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Ann Biomed Eng 33:951–962.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Beatty MW, Bruno MJ, Iwasaki LR, Nickel JC (2001). Strain rate dependent orthotropic properties of pristine and impulsively loaded porcine temporomandibular joint disk. J Biomed Mater Res 57:25–34.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Beatty MW, Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Leiker M (2003). Mechanical response of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc to an impact event and repeated tensile loading. J Orofac Pain 17:160–166.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Beek M, Koolstra JH, van Ruijven LJ, van Eijden TM (2000). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomech 33:307–316.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Beek M, Aarnts MP, Koolstra JH, Feilzer AJ, van Eijden TM (2001). Dynamic properties of the human temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res 80:876–880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Detamore MS, Athanasiou KA (2003). Tensile properties of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. J Biomech Eng 125:558–565.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Detamore MS, Orfanos JG, Almarza AJ, French MM, Wong ME, Athanasiou KA (2005). Quantitative analysis and comparative regional investigation of the extracellular matrix of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Matrix Biol 24:45–57.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Detamore MS, Athanasiou KA, Mao J (2007). A call to action for bioengineers and dental professionals: directives for the future of TMJ bioengineering. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1301–1311.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Donzelli PS, Gallo LM, Spilker RL, Palla S (2004). Biphasic finite element simulation of the TMJ disc from in vivo kinematic and geometric measurements. J Biomech 37:1787–1791.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ferry JD (1980). Viscoelastic properties of polymers. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Herring SW (2003). TMJ anatomy and animal models. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 3:391–394.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Klemuk SA, Titze IR (2004). Viscoelastic properties of three vocal-fold injectable biomaterials at low audio frequencies. Laryngoscope 114:1597–1603.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Koolstra JH (2003). Number crunching with the human masticatory system. J Dent Res 82:672–676.[Free Full Text]
  • Koolstra JH, Tanaka E, Van Eijden TM (2007). Viscoelastic material model for the temporomandibular joint disc derived from dynamic shear tests or strain-relaxation tests. J Biomech 40:2330–2334.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuboki T, Shinoda M, Orsini MG, Yamashita A (1997). Viscoelastic properties of the pig temporomandibular joint articular soft tissues of the condyle and disc. J Dent Res 76:1760–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Mavrilas D, Sinouris EA, Vynios DH, Papageorgakopoulou N (2005). Dynamic mechanical characteristics of intact and structurally modified bovine pericardial tissues. J Biomech 38:761–768.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Menard KP (1999). Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Park S, Ateshian GA (2006). Dynamic response of immature bovine articular cartilage in tension and compression, and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of the tensile response. J Biomech Eng 128:623–630.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Rees LA (1954). The structure and function of the mandibular joint. Br Dent J 96:125–133.
  • Scapino RP, Obrez A, Greising D (2006). Organization and function of the collagen fiber system in the human temporomandibular joint disk and its attachments. Cells Tissues Organs 182:201–225.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tanaka E, van Eijden T (2003). Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:138–150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tanaka E, Aoyama J, Tanaka M, Murata H, Hamada T, Tanne K (2002). Dynamic properties of bovine temporomandibular joint disks change with age. J Dent Res 81:618–622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tanaka E, Aoyama J, Tanaka M, Van Eijden T, Sugiyama M, Hanaoka K, et al. (2003a). The proteoglycan contents of the temporomandibular joint disc influence its dynamic viscoelastic properties. J Biomed Mater Res A 65:386–392.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tanaka E, Hanaoka K, van Eijden T, Tanaka M, Watanabe M, Nishi M, et al. (2003b). Dynamic shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res 82:228–231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Tanaka E, Kawai N, Van Eijden T, Watanabe M, Hanaoka K, Nishi M, et al. (2003c). Impulsive compression influences the viscous behavior of porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Eur J Oral Sci 111:353–358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tanaka E, Kikuzaki M, Hanaoka K, Tanaka M, Sasaki A, Kawai N, et al. (2003d). Dynamic compressive properties of porcine temporomandibular joint disc. Eur J Oral Sci 111:434–439.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tanaka E, del Pozo R, Tanaka M, Asai D, Hirose M, Iwabe T, et al. (2004a). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of human temporomandibular joint with and without disc displacement during jaw opening. Med Eng Phys 26:503–511.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Tanaka E, Kawai N, Hanaoka K, Van Eijden T, Sasaki A, Aoyama J, et al. (2004b). Shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc in relation to compressive and shear strain. J Dent Res 83:476–479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Teng S, Xu Y (1991). Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of TMJ discs in dogs: part 1. Gross anatomy and collagen fiber orientation of the discs. J Craniomandib Disord 5:28–34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Teng S, Xu Y, Cheng M, Li Y (1991). Biomechanical properties and collagen fiber orientation of TMJ discs in dogs: part 2. Tensile mechanical properties of the discs. J Craniomandib Disord 5:107–114.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wakeling JM, Nigg BM (2001). Modification of soft tissue vibrations in the leg by muscular activity. J Appl Physiol 90:412–420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Wang TG, Hsiao TY, Wang CL, Shau YW (2007). Resonance frequency in patellar tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:535–538.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 11, 1053-1057 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808701112


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snider, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Detamore, M.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snider, G.R.
Right arrow Articles by Detamore, M.S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?