Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biomaterials & Bioengineering

Sliding Contact Fatigue Damage in Layered Ceramic Structures

J.-W. Kim, J.-H. Kim, V.P. Thompson and Y. Zhang*

Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, 345 E. 24th St., Room 813C, New York, NY 10010, USA

Correspondence: * corresponding author, yz21{at}nyu.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Porcelain-veneered restorations often chip and fracture from repeated occlusal loading, making fatigue studies relevant. Most fatigue studies are limited to uni-axial loading without sliding motion. We hypothesized that bi-axial loading (contact-load-slide-liftoff, simulating a masticatory cycle), as compared with uni-axial loading, accelerates the fatigue of layered ceramics. Monolithic glass plates were epoxy-joined to polycarbonate substrates as a transparent model for an all-ceramic crown on dentin. Uni-and bi-axial cyclic contact was applied through a hard sphere in water, by means of a mouth-motion simulator apparatus. The uni-axial (contact-load-hold-liftoff) and traditional R-ratio fatigue (indenter never leaves the specimen surface) produced similar lifespans, while bi-axial fatigue was more severe. The accelerated crack growth rate in bi-axial fatigue is attributed to enhanced tensile stresses at the trailing edges of a moving indenter. Fracture mechanics descriptions for damage evolution in brittle materials loaded repeatedly with a sliding sphere are provided. Clinical relevance is addressed.

Key Words: fatigue • load-slide contact • partial cone cracks • layered structures • ceramics


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
One of the emerging causes of fracture of all-ceramic dental restorations is the generation of microcracks due to occlusal contact and wear. To improve the contact damage resistance of dental ceramics, one must understand the damage mechanisms involved.

A three-phase model of a chewing cycle has been proposed by DeLong and Douglas (1983): a preparatory phase, during which the mandible is positioned; a crushing phase, which starts from tooth contact with the food bolus until it comes into contact with the opposing tooth; and a final grinding or sliding phase, where the 2 opposing teeth slide against each other under the masticatory force. The sliding phase for the molar teeth begins with an eccentric contact of the mandibular buccal cusps with the inner inclines of the maxillary buccal cusps, followed by a sliding movement through centric occlusion, and then lifting off (Fig. 1aGo). The average length of the sliding path of a first molar is ~ 0.5 mm (DeLong and Douglas, 1983). The actual sliding path is in the form of an arc, due to occlusal anatomy. However, a straight-line motion gives a good approximation, because sliding movement is much smaller than the radius of the cusps, typically R ~ 10 cm (DeLong and Douglas, 1983). The magnitude of the masticatory forces is from 9 to 180 N (Kelly, 1999). The duration of the forces is from 0.25 to 0.33 sec (Jemt et al., 1979).


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Schematic of contact with load-slide action. (a) Tooth eccentric occlusal position of right side first molar. Arrow indicates direction of sliding as teeth move to centric occlusion. Relative tooth radii at buccal cusp contacts are shown. (b) Experimental arrangement for indentation of brittle layer on compliant substrate with superposed tangential force component.

 
The above contact-slide action is most pertinent to porcelain occlusal damage and wear. Yet most contact fatigue studies use uni-axial loading without the critical sliding action. This study sought to address this by using mouth-motion-like fatigue loading (contact-load-slide-liftoff) on crack evolution in ceramics with uni-axial and R-ratio controls.


    MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Materials Systems
Soda-lime glass was used as a model material, because its physical properties are similar to those of dental porcelains, and its transparency allows for in situ observation of the entire evolution of fracture. Glass plates (25 x 25 x 1 mm, Daigger, Wheeling, IL, USA) were polished on side surfaces for in situ viewing during testing. The top surfaces of the glass plates were lightly abraded with 600-grit SiC to provide an adequate density of flaws for cone crack initiation, for the introduction of flaws comparable in scale (~ 10 – 20 µm) with those associated with crystallites in the porcelain and glass-ceramic interior. The bottom surfaces of the plates were etched with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 5 min to remove surface flaws and to avoid flexure-induced bulk fracture from the cementation interface. Plates were then joined to the polycarbonate substrates (12.5 mm thick, AlN Plastics, Norfolk, VA, USA) with a thin layer (~ 10–20 µm) of epoxy adhesive, which was allowed to cure for 48 hrs. Since the elastic modulus of epoxy (3.5 GPa) is similar to that of polycarbonate (2.3 GPa), the structure was effectively a glass/polycarbonate bilayer. For reference, porcelain-veneered (LAVA Ceram, 3M/ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) ({phi}20 x 1 mm), fully sintered CAD/CAM zirconia plates ({phi} 20 x 0.5 mm) (LAVA Frame, 3M/ESPE) were cemented (Rely X, ARC, 3M/ESPE) to composite blocks (Z100, 3M/ESPE) (Kim et al., 2007).

Fatigue Tests
To facilitate direct comparison of the damage responses of brittle materials under R-ratio, uni-axial, and bi-axial loading, we conducted Hertzian indentation fatigue tests on glass/polycarbonate bilayers at Pm = 120 N (peak load), with tungsten carbide (WC) spheres of radius r = 1.5 mm in room-temperature water. For comparison, bi-axial tests were conducted on the porcelain-veneered zirconia system. The R-ratio fatigue tests were carried out on a servo-hydraulic universal testing machine (Model 8502, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA) with an oscillating load between a maximum load Pm = 120 N and a minimum load 2 N (the indenter never leaves the surface), at a constant frequency f = 1 Hz. The uni-axial and bi-axial fatigue tests were carried out on a mouth-motion simulator (Elf 3300, EnduraTEC Division of Bose, Minnetonka, MN, USA) with a controlled profile: Pm = 120 N, loading and unloading rates = 1000 N/s, and a chewing frequency ~ 1 Hz. For the uni-axial fatigue tests, each load cycle consisted of the indenter coming into contact with the specimen, loading to a maximum, holding for 0.35 sec, unloading, and lifting off (0.5 mm) from the specimen surface; the indenter was restricted to a vertical motion. For the bi-axial tests, specimens were fixed onto a lateral motion drive table. A load profile identical to that for the uni-axial loading was used, except that while the indenter was holding the maximum load for 0.35 sec, the table moved laterally at a constant velocity v = 2 mm/sec for 0.7 mm, and then during the indenter lifting-off phase, the specimen table returned to its original position (Fig. 1bGo). The friction coefficient for sliding in water was µ {approx} 0.58. It was estimated according to Eq. A4 (APPENDIX), with a measured value of {alpha}', the inclination angle for distorted cone cracks in sliding contact, while assuming that {alpha} = 22°, the inclination angle for classic Hertzian cone cracks in uni-axial loading (APPENDIX). At least 3 tests were conducted for each condition. All tests were recorded with a video camcorder (Canon XL1, Canon, Lake Success, NY, USA) equipped with a custom-designed microscope zoom system (Zhang et al., 2005a). Crack depth and angle were measured from video frames to ± 5 µm and ± 0.5°, respectively.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Crack Morphology
In all instances, cone cracks were the dominant mode of fracture, but differed in evolution, with R-ratio and uni-axial fatigue most similar (see sequence in Fig. 2aGo, Pm = 120 N). In both R-ratio and uni-axial fatigue, the outer cone initiated first and propagated downward and outward at a slow but steady pace. The angle of the cone crack, {alpha}, relative to the free surface was typically 22 ± 5°. Subsequently, an inner cone formed within the contact region from the occlusal surface and extended downward at a relatively high rate and steep angle (55 ± 15°). Intrusion of water into the inner cone crack was evident, especially during the loading cycle. When inner cones propagated approximately halfway through the glass thickness, they began to experience the plate flexure-induced tensile stresses and surged abruptly to the glass polycarbonate interface. In all tests, failure of the glass layer resulted from the deep-penetrating inner cones.


Figure 2
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Side view video sequence of cone cracks evolving in glass plate on polycarbonate bilayer with (a) uni-axial and (b) bi-axial loading, following various numbers of cycles n. Indentation with tungsten carbide (WC) sphere of radius r = 1.5 mm, in water. Only the glass plate of thickness d = 1 mm is shown here. Note in (a) that outer cone (O) forms first, but inner cones (I) propagate to the glass/polycarbonate interface, while in (b) partial cones (P) penetrate the glass layer. Also shown here are the top view optical micrographs of a (c) glass/polycarbonate bilayer and (d) LAVA porcelain-veneered zirconia subjected to single-cycle bi-axial loading at Pm = 120 N, with a WC sphere of r = 1.5 mm, in water. Note: The damage patterns are similar in glass and porcelain. Arrows in (b), (c), and (d) indicate the sliding direction for the bi-axial test.

 
In bi-axial fatigue at the same load ( Pm = 120 N, Fig. 2bGo), a comparable sequence of observations revealed a series of partial cone cracks forming in the first sliding cycle (distorted outer cones of uni-axial loading; see APPENDIX). The trailing edges of the partial cones had an inclination angle {alpha}' = 52 ± 10°, which was much steeper than for classic Hertzian outer cones in uni-axial loading ({alpha} = 22 ± 5°). Water intrusion was observed from the second sliding cycle onward. These partial cones became increasingly unstable as they approached the mid-thickness of the glass plate, and ultimately jumped to the glass polycarbonate interface. The final crack configuration had a tilted aspect, somewhat like the schematic in the APPENDIX (APPENDIX Fig., bGo). The main difference between the bi-axial fatigue and uni-axial or R-ratio fatigue was propagation of the partial cones to the glass polycarbonate interface, rather than the inner cones in the latter.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Appendix Figure. Schematic showing cone crack geometry in brittle layers with (a) uni-axial and (b) bi-axial loading. To first approximation, cone geometry in (b) remains ’symmetrical’ around the realigned load axis, with a portion of the cone intersecting the top surface (arrow), resulting in partial cones.

 
Similar sliding damage features, a series of partial cones, were observed in surface-view optical micrographs of glass/polycarbonate and porcelain/zirconia/composite structures subjected to single-cycle bi-axial loading ( Pm = 120 N, WC indenter, r = 1.5 mm) in water (Figs. 2c, 2dGo).

Crack Evolution
Crack depth h was measured at the point of maximum penetration for a prescribed number of cycles in the video footage. Plots of crack evolution for glass/polycarbonate structures under fatigue loading in R-ratio, uni-axial, and biaxial profiles were constructed (Figs. 3a–3cGo, respectively). Datapoints are individual measurements for each fracture type. The data for outer (unfilled symbols) and inner cones (filled symbols) showed similar trends in R-ratio and uni-axial fatigue (Figs. 3a, 3bGo). The outer cone cracks formed within 10 cycles and propagated rapidly to a depth ~ 100 {chi}m before leveling out over the remaining cycles. The inner cones became visible at ~ 500 cycles, which was considerably later compared with outer cones, but quickly outgrew the outer cones and propagated substantially deeper. They became more unstable as they began to experience flexural tensile stresses, ultimately penetrating abruptly to the glass polycarbonate interface. Whereas the well-developed outer cones followed a classic slow crack growth (SCG) dependence, the inner cones followed a much steeper depth-cycle curve, indicating a sustained driving force throughout the entire crack evolution (Zhang et al., 2005b). The numbers of cycles to failure were similar in R-ratio and uni-axial fatigue (vertical dashed lines in Figs. 3a and 3bGo).


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Plot of crack depth h as a function of number of cycles n in glass/polycarbonate bilayer, for (a) R-ratio fatigue, (b) uni-axial fatigue, and (c) bi-axial fatigue. Indentation with WC sphere of radius r = 1.5 mm, maximum load Pm = 120 N, in water. Failure occurred when crack depth h reached the glass/polycarbonate interface (top of the vertical axis, glass thickness d = 1000 µm) at a critical number of cycles nF (vertical dashed lines). Note: Crack growth was substantially enhanced in bi-axial loading. Each graph consists of three runs, indicated by {triangleup}, {circ}, or {square}.

 
During the first sliding cycle of bi-axial fatigue (Fig. 3cGo), a series of partial cone cracks formed, at a much greater depth (~ 200 {chi}m) and a steeper angle to the classic outer cone cracks of uni-axial loading. Under the subsequent sliding contacts, one of the partial cone cracks, usually the second or the third one from the initial contact point, began to dominate. This dominant crack extended downward dramatically to the half-thickness of the glass plate, followed by a rapid jump to the glass polycarbonate interface. The number of cycles required for cracks to penetrate the entire glass layer was over 2 orders of magnitude less for partial cones as compared with inner cones in both uni-axial and R-ratio fatigue (vertical dashed lines in Fig. 3Go). A one-sample t test showed this difference to be significant (p < 0.001).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
This report has considered the influence of bi-axial fatigue on crack modes in brittle-layer structures using a hard sphere in water, with data on model glass/polycarbonate bilayers as a case study. For a glass thickness of 1 mm used here, the dominant stresses are the near-contact Hertzian stresses. The corresponding mode of fracture is occlusal surface cone cracking. Definitive experiments have been conducted to identify the effect of the initial quasi-impact contact and sliding action (analogous to tooth contact during mastication) on the damage modes and fatigue life of brittle layers on compliant substrates. Our findings showed that an initial quasi-impact contact had little influence on either damage modes or fatigue life of glass/polycarbonate bilayers. However, sliding motion under masticatory force was highly deleterious to the layers’ lifetime. Therefore, sliding action must be considered in any laboratory simulation of the clinical environment intended to establish the longevity of all-ceramic crowns.

Friction associated with sliding action intensified the tensile stresses at the trailing edges of the contact, generating a series of partial cone cracks. Both theory (APPENDIX) and experiments indicate that, for a given load, partial cone cracks penetrate deeper into the material relative to uni-axial outer cone cracks. The uni-axial outer cones experience tensile stresses throughout the entire load-unload cycle, while partial cones experience both compressive (shaded grey) and tensile stresses as the indenter slides across the surface (Fig. 4Go). Therefore, partial cones undergo hydraulic pumping, as the inner cones in uni-axial loading. Fracture mechanics descriptions for hydraulic pumping of inner cones in uni-axial fatigue loading in water have been developed (Bhowmick et al., 2005; Chai and Lawn, 2005; Zhang et al., 2005b). Briefly, inner cones initiate within the contact region. As the load increases, the inner cone crack initially experiences small tensile stresses that open the crack, allowing water to enter. Upon increasing load, the indenter engulfs the crack, sealing the crack mouth and subjecting the water-filled crack to a Hertzian compression zone. Once the inner cones grow sufficiently large to extend beyond the compression zone, the extremities of the inner cones enter a tensile field. Compressive crack-mouth pinching forces water downward, driving the inner cones deeper. By a similar mechanism, partial cones penetrate the ceramic layer more rapidly than do inner cones, because:


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Schematic demonstrating water entrapment model for fatigue loading with (a,b) uni-axial and (c,d) bi-axial configurations. Shaded area beneath contact designates approximate compression zone. The inclination angles for partial and outer cones in uni-axial and bi-axial loading are {alpha}' and {alpha}, respectively. (a) Water enters the inner cone crack (I) prior to contact engulfment. (b) As the indenter contact expands, the water is trapped and is squeezed toward the crack tip, causing downward penetration. Note: In (a) and (b) outer cone cracks, (O) always lies in the Hertzian tensile field outside the contact, and water is never trapped in this crack. (c) Water enters the partial cone crack (P) at the trailing edge of the contact at the n cycle. (d) As the indenter slides across the surface in the n + 1 cycle, compressive crack-mouth pinching squeezes the water toward the crack tip. Cyclic contact repeats the process, forcing more water into the crack in successive cycles. Arrows in (c) and (d) represent the sliding direction for the biaxial test. +Tension; -compression.

 
  1. partial cones can form in a large size within a few sliding cycles, and their extremities immediately experience the tensile stresses as the indenter slides across the surface, meaning that inner cones must undergo an incubation stage during which they are completely trapped in the Hertzian compression zone; and
  2. partial cones experience an enhanced compressive stress at the full engulfment of the indenter, plus an intensified tensile stress at the trailing edge of the moving indenter. Inner cones experience only smaller tensile stresses.

We have not considered internal radial cracks, originating from the cementation surfaces. These far-field flexural-stress-induced cracks are not sensitive to loading conditions, uni-axial or bi-axial (Lee et al., 2001). Radial cracks can become dangerous in thin ceramic crowns, since they propagate rapidly and the load for initiation falls off rapidly with diminishing thickness. Radial fracture will not be an immediate threat to ceramic thickness > 1 mm. For dental crowns, the norm is a thickness of 1.5 mm, but geometric constraints imposed by tooth position and the opposing dentition may limit thickness.

Our studies found that cone cracks ceased at the glass/polycarbonate interface, neither propagating into the polycarbonate base nor extending along the interface. Although the incidence of occlusal cone cracks may not result in catastrophic failure of the ceramic crowns, as may cementation radial fractures (i.e., bulk fracture), they may nevertheless provide pathways for external elements to the interior of the layer system. In the case of weak interfaces, cone cracks can promote interlayer delamination.

We acknowledge that occlusion involves enamel-porcelain or porcelain-porcelain antagonistic contacts with various cuspal radii. The question arises: How do the choices of indenter material and radius influence the mechanics? A recent study has shown that the critical loads and numbers of cycles to penetrate an occlusal surface cone crack through a glass layer are insensitive to either the indenter material (WC or glass) or the indenter radius (r = 1.6–12.5 mm) (Bhowmick et al., 2007). The choice of a hard WC indenter is simply to enable multiple testing to be conducted without the need for test-by-test replacement of the indenter. Our results might be modified in saliva, which is known to reduce the friction coefficient between the slider and the ceramic surface (Koran et al., 1972). Further investigation into the effect of saliva is warranted.

In summary, occlusal-like bi-axial loading of brittle crown-like structures can trigger a series of partial cone cracks, capable of causing failure by propagation to the intervening interface. Fracture mechanics descriptions (APPENDIX) have been developed for the evolution of partial cones in brittle materials loaded repeatedly with a sliding sphere. In aqueous environments, the friction-activated partial cone cracks are much more deleterious than the outer and inner cone cracks associated with uni-axial fatigue loading.


    APPENDIX
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
FRACTURE MECHANICS ANALYSIS OF HERTZIAN CONTACT
The stress fields associated with frictionless elastic contacts (µ = 0) between a rigid spherical indenter and a flat brittle specimen have been solved by Hertz (Hertz, 1882). The semi-ellipsoidal distribution of contact pressure gives rise to a region of compression of the surface in the center of the contact, surrounded by a region of tension with the maximum tensile stresses in the specimen occurring at the edge of the contact circle. Hamilton and Goodman (Hamilton and Goodman, 1966; Hamilton, 1983) have extended the analysis to the case where the indenter is moved across the specimen surface at a constant velocity. Their main conclusions were that: (1) the friction between the sliding sphere and the specimen added a compressive stress at the front edge of the contact and enhanced the tensile stress at the trailing edge of the contact; and (2) greater friction yielded higher tensile stresses. These findings indicate that cone cracks would initiate at a lower load in the sliding contact compared with normal loading.

A complete analysis of crack initiation and propagation under the action of Hertzian contact requires a knowledge of fracture mechanics. It is now well-appreciated that cone cracks start from small flaws on the specimen surface just outside the contact circle, where the tensile stresses are greatest (Frank and Lawn, 1967). Embryonic cracks, initially in the form of shallow surface ring cracks, will, at a critical load, propagate downward and flare outward into a truncated cone configuration (Lawn, 1998). A detailed analysis of cone crack initiation at the small-flaw stage has been described (Frank and Lawn, 1967). Here, we focus on the classic cone crack in its well-developed state, i.e., cone cracks enter the tensile far-field, where the crack length C >> R0 (R0 is the contact radius) (APPENDIX Fig., aGo). The far-field approximation solution for the dimension C of a virtual cone under a normal load Pn is given by (Lawn, 1993):


Formula 1(Eq. A1)

where Kc is the stress-intensity factor, and {chi} is a crack geometry coefficient.

With the actual penetration depth of a virtual cone h = C sin {alpha} ({alpha} is the inclination angle of the cone relative to the specimen surface) (APPENDIX Fig., aGo), we have:


Formula 2(Eq. A2)

When the indenting sphere is laterally translated across a brittle surface, friction at the contact intensifies the tensile stresses at the trailing edges of the contact circles, resulting in the generation of a series of distorted classic cone cracks, i.e., partial cone cracks (APPENDIX Fig., bGo) (Lawn, 1967). A theoretical model for the formation of the partial cone cracks has been proposed (Lawn et al., 1984). The effects of the tangential loading are to increase the magnitude of the resultant load and to alter its direction with respect to the normal surface (APPENDIX Fig., bGo). At a critical load, a cone crack forms, but with its axis oriented in the direction of the resultant load P'. The solution for this oriented cone crack depth h' can be expressed as:


Formula 3(Eq. A3)

The inclination angle {alpha}' of the rotated cone on its steepest side is:


Formula 4(Eq. A4)

where {theta} = arctan µ.

Explicit equations (A2–A4) quantitatively predict the penetration depth and inclination angle of cone cracks for biaxial (contact-load-slide-liftoff) loading. For a given normal load Pn, a larger friction results in a larger cone crack (C'), with a steeper inclination angle ({alpha}') and deeper penetration depth (h'). In the case of sufficiently large friction, i.e., µ > tan {alpha} or simply {theta} > {alpha} [for soda-lime glass, {alpha} {approx} 22° (Kocer and Collins, 1998)], a part of the virtual cone crack may protrude from the surface, resulting in a partial cone configuration.

APPENDIX REFERENCES

Frank FC, Lawn BR (1967). On the theory of Hertzian fracture. Proc R Soc London Series A Math Phys Sci 299(1458):291–306. Hamilton GM (1983). Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proc Inst Mech Eng 197(C):53–59. Hamilton GM, Goodman LE (1966). The stress field created by a circular sliding contact. J Appl Mechanics 33:371–376. Hertz H (1882). On the contact of elastic solids. J Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 92:156–171. Kocer C, Collins RE (1998). Angle of Hertzian cone cracks. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1736–1742. Lawn BR (1967). Partial cone crack formation in a brittle material loaded with a sliding spherical indenter. Proc R Soc Lond Series A Math Phys Sci 299:307–316. Lawn BR (1993). Fracture of brittle solids. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lawn BR (1998). Indentation of ceramics with spheres: a century after Hertz. J Am Ceram Soc 81:1977–1994. Lawn BR, Wiederhorn SM, Roberts DE (1984). Effect of sliding friction forces on the strength of brittle materials. J Mater Sci 19:2561–2569.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Valuable discussions with Dr. Brian R. Lawn are appreciated. This work is supported by the New York University Research Challenge Fund.


    FOOTNOTES
 
A supplemental appendix to this article is published electronically only at http://www.dentalresearch.org.

Received for publication February 22, 2007. Revision received June 5, 2007. Accepted for publication June 12, 2007.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 

  • Bhowmick S, Zhang Y, Lawn BR (2005). Competing fracture modes in brittle materials subject to concentrated cyclic loading in liquid environments: bilayer structures. J Mater Res 20:2792–2800.
  • Bhowmick S, Meléndez-Martínez JJ, Hermann I, Zhang Y, Lawn BR (2007). Role of indenter material and size in veneer failure of brittle layer structures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 82:253–259.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Chai H, Lawn BR (2005). Hydraulically pumped cone fracture in brittle solids. Acta Materialia 53:4237–4244.
  • DeLong R, Douglas WH (1983). Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi–axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 62:32–36.
  • Jemt T, Karlsson S, Hedegard B (1979). Mandibular movements of young adults recorded by intraorally placed light-emitting diodes. J Prosthet Dent 42:669–673.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kelly JR (1999). Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81:652–661.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kim B, Zhang Y, Pines M, Thompson VP (2007). Fracture of porcelain veneered structures in fatigue. J Dent Res 86:142–146.
  • Koran A, Craig RG, Tillitson EW (1972). Coefficient of friction of prosthetic tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent 27:269–274[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lee C-S, Lawn BR, Kim DK (2001). Effect of tangential loading on critical conditions for radial cracking in brittle coatings. J Am Ceram Soc 84:2719–2721.
  • Zhang Y, Bhowmick S, Lawn BR (2005a). Competing fracture modes in brittle materials subject to concentrated cyclic loading in liquid environments: monoliths. J Mater Res 20:2021–2029.
  • Zhang Y, Song J-K, Lawn BR (2005b). Deep penetrating conical cracks in brittle layers from hydraulic cyclic contact. J Biomed Mater Res 73(B):186–193.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 11, 1046-1050 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708601105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
P.G. Coelho, E.A. Bonfante, N.R.F. Silva, E.D. Rekow, and V.P. Thompson
Laboratory Simulation of Y-TZP All-ceramic Crown Clinical Failures
Journal of Dental Research, April 1, 2009; 88(4): 382 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?