|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Biomaterials & Bioengineering |
Bonding BisGMA to Dentin—a Proof of Concept for Hydrophobic Dentin Bonding
F.R. Tay1,*,
D.H. Pashley1,
R.R. Kapur2,
M.R.O. Carrilho3,
Y.B. Hur2,
L.V. Garrett2 and
K.C.Y. Tay4
1 Department of Oral Biology & Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-1129, USA;
2 School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA;
3 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil; and
4 University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: * corresponding author, FTAY{at}mcg.edu
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The use of TEGDMA as a diluent comonomer in the formulation of hydrophobic adhesives for ethanol wet-bonding is a concern, due to its leaching potential, higher water sorption, and bio-incompatibility. This study tested the hypothesis that hydrophobic bonding to acid-etched dentin may be accomplished with the use of ethanol-solvated BisGMA only. Phosphoric-acid-etched, oxalate-occluded, deep coronal dentin bonded under 20 cm water pressure with experimental BisGMA adhesives by ethanol wet-bonding exhibited tensile strengths that were not significantly different from that achieved with OptiBond FL bonded according to the manufacturer-recommended protocol, with similar acid-/base-resistant hybrid layers, resin tags, and nanoleakage distribution. Ethanol replacement of water-saturated dentin produced wider interfibrillar spaces, more extensive shrinkage of the collagen fibrils, and narrower hybrid layers. Experimental BisGMA adhesives provide the proof of concept that relatively hydrophobic resins may be coupled to acid-etched dentin by increasing its hydrophobic characteristics via ethanol replacement. They should be further optimized before clinical application.
Key Words: dentin bonding hydrophobic resin Bis-GMA acid-etched dentin ethanol wet bonding
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Attempts to couple hydrophobic resins to dentin date back to the introduction of acid-etching and the synthesis of 2,2-bis[4(2-hydroxy-3- methacryloyloxy-propyloxy)-phenyl] propane (BisGMA) (Brudevold et al., 1956; Laswell et al., 1971). Since BisGMA has no specific chemical groups for competing with water, surface-active comonomers were introduced to promote adhesion to dentin (Bowen, 1965). Traditionally, hydrophilic resin monomers are used in dentin adhesives to enhance their wetting properties and to avoid phase changes when hydrophobic dimethacrylates are added to water (Spencer and Wang, 2002). Adhesives containing hydrophilic resins exhibit high water affinity (Ito et al., 2005; Yiu et al., 2006), resulting in rapid deterioration of their mechanical properties (Yiu et al., 2004; Ito et al., 2005).
To extend the longevity of resin-dentin bonds, it has been proposed that future dentin adhesives be rendered less hydrophilic (Tay and Pashley, 2003). Ideally, this should be accomplished with the use of hydrophilic resin monomers that become hydrophobic after polymerization; however, there is no evidence that such a chimeric property exists in polymer chemistry (B.I. Suh, personal communication). The alternative strategy is to make acid-etched dentin less hydrophilic. so that it is compatible with hydrophobic resin monomers. This may be achieved by replacing water in the demineralized collagen matrix with ethanol. Known as the "ethanol wet-bonding" technique (Pashley et al., 2007), this protocol prevents phase separation of the hydrophobic dimethacrylates as they are applied to ethanol-saturated instead of water-saturated dentin (Becker et al., 2007). Recent studies have shown that it is possible to coax an ethanol-solvated BisGMA/triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) comonomer blend into acid-etched dentin by means of chemical dehydration techniques that maintain the integrity of the interfibrillar spaces (Nishitani et al., 2006; Sadek et al., 2007b).
BisGMA is highly viscous, due to its molecular stiffness and intermolecular hydrogen bonding, and must be diluted with glycol dimethacrylates, such as TEGDMA, to facilitate handling. The potential disadvantages with the use of a TEGDMA diluent include its leaching potential (Geurtsen, 1998; Ortengren et al., 2001) and higher water sorption (Pereira et al., 2002; Sideridou et al., 2003). Since ethanol-solvated adhesives may be placed close to vital dental pulps, the potential chemical-biological interactions of TEGDMA with oral tissues (Janke et al., 2003; Abebe and Maddux, 2006; Schweikl et al., 2006) may also be of clinical concern. It is anticipated that the viscosity of ethanol-solvated BisGMA is low enough to infiltrate ethanol-saturated acid-etched dentin without an adjunctive diluent. The resultant hybrid layer may also be rendered more hydrophobic and hydrolytically stable by elimination of the relatively hydrophilic TEGDMA comonomer (Engelmann et al., 2002). Thus, the objectives of this study were to examine the feasibility of bonding BisGMA to acid-etched dentin, and to analyze the ultrastructure of the collagen matrix in hybrid layers created with the ethanol wet-bonding technique. The null hypotheses tested were that there are no differences (1) between tensile strengths of resin-dentin bonds, and (2) among various dimensional attributes in hybrid layers created in deep coronal dentin with BisGMA-ethanol wet-bonding or a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
 |
MATERIALS & METHODS
|
|---|
Hydrophobic Adhesives
We formulated an experimental ethanol-based, light-cured BisGMA dentin primer by blending 9.85 g BisGMA, 0.05 g camphorquinone, and 0.1 gethyl-4-N, N dimethyl-aminobenzoate with 10 g of 100% ethanol (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). To prevent moisture contamination, we added 1 g of molecular sieves (M514-500, Fisher Chemical, Fairlawn, NJ, USA) to the dentin primer as a dehydrant. We calculated the Hoys solubility parameters (Hoy, 1989) for dispersion forces ( d), polar forces ( p), and hydrogen bonding ( h) of the dentin primer (Table 1 ) by summing the molar attraction constants of its chemical components (Computer Chemistry Consultancy, Singen-Friedingen, Germany). Similarly, we estimated the Hoys solubility parameters for water-saturated and ethanol-saturated acid-etched dentin (Table 1 ) by assuming a composition of 30 wt% liquid and 70 wt% collagen peptide content in these matrices (Miller et al., 1998), using a previously reported fractional contribution algorithm (Agee et al., 2006). We determined miscibility between ethanol-solvated BisGMA (solvent) and the ethanol-saturated collagen matrix (polymer) by calculating their Hoys solubility parameter differences [ 5(MPa) ] (Table 1 ; Fig. 1 ). Although BisGMA concentrations below 50 wt% were conjectured to be miscible with the ethanol-saturated collagen matrix (data not shown), the highest BisGMA concentration (ca. 50 wt%) was selected to achieve a balance between substrate-primer miscibility and resin content.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1. Composition and Hoys Solubility Parameters for Neat BisGMA, the Experimental Ethanol-solvated BisGMA Primer, and the Solvent-saturated Collagen Matrices
|
|
Two-step and three-step hydrophobic etch-and-rinse adhesives were designed based on the experimental BisGMA primer. For the two-step system, 2 consecutive coats of the unfilled primer were used. The first coat was applied to the dentin with agitation for 15 sec. A second application of fresh adhesive was made, giving a total application time of 30 sec. Excess solvent was evaporated with a gentle air stream for 10 sec. The adhesive was then light-cured for 20 sec. For the three-step system, the first coat of unfilled primer was applied as previously described. After solvent evaporation, a coat of a low-viscosity flowable composite (ÆliteFlo LV, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) was applied, air-thinned, and light-cured for 20 sec prior to composite placement. This technique simulated the use of an unfilled hydrophilic primer and a filled bonding resin that is currently used in OptiBond FL (Sybron-Kerr, Orange, CA, USA), a hydrophilic three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive that is regarded as an excellent reference dentin adhesive (De Munck et al., 2006).
Experimental Design
Thirty human third molars were collected after the individuals informed consent had been obtained under a protocol reviewed and approved by the Human Assurance Committee of the Medical College of Georgia. A flat dentin surface was prepared perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of each tooth with a slow-speed Isomet saw (Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) under water-cooling. A second parallel cut was made 3 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. Pulpal tissues were removed from the pulp chamber. The crown segment was polished with 180-grit silicon carbide paper under running water, to create a bonding substrate in deep coronal dentin, with a remaining dentin thickness of 0.5–1 mm as measured from the highest pulp horn. The crown segments were randomly divided into 3 groups (N = 10 each): (1) two-step BisGMA adhesive, (2) three-step BisGMA adhesive, and (3) OptiBond FL (control).
Each crown segment was attached to a Plexiglass platform that was perforated by a piece of 18-gauge stainless steel tubing. For all groups, the dentin surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel (Etch 37, Bisco Inc.) for 15 sec, rinsed, and left moist to prevent collapse of the collagen matrix. To prevent subsequent water contamination of the resin-bonded interface by outward movement of dentinal fluid after ethanol replacement (Sadek et al., 2007a), we treated the etched dentin with 2.8% half-neutralized oxalic acid (pH 2.2; BisBlock, Bisco Inc.) for 1 min, followed by water rinsing, to occlude the patent dentinal tubules with subsurface calcium oxalate crystals (Pashley et al., 2001). Tubular occlusion was universally adopted for all experimental and control groups, so that an additional variable would not be introduced into the experimental design.
Bonding Procedures
Each Plexiglass-crown segment assembly was attached via polyethylene tubing to a syringe barrel filled with de-ionized water. The latter was raised to deliver 20 cm of water pressure during bonding. For the 2 experimental groups, ethanol wet-bonding was performed by the delivery of 100% ethanol via a squeeze bottle containing the molecular sieves as a dehydrant to the water-saturated acid-etched dentin. After 20 sec, excess ethanol was blotted, and adhesive application was performed as previously described. For the control group, a new set of OptiBond FL Unidose capsules was used for each crown segment, according to the manufacturers instructions. Light-curing was performed with an Optilux 500 halogen light-curing unit (Demetron/Kerr, Danbury, CT, USA) with a power output of 600 mW/cm2. Composite build-ups were constructed with Z250 (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) in 5 1-mm-thick increments.
Tensile Testing
After storage in de-ionized water at 37°C for 24 hrs, each tooth was vertically sectioned into 0.9-mm-thick serial slabs by means of the Isomet saw with water cooling. The central slab was utilized for subsequent morphologic examination. The 2 adjacent slabs were sectioned into 0.9 x 0.9-mm beams. The 2 longest beams from each slab were selected for tensile testing. Each beam was stressed to failure under tension in a Vitrodyne V1000 universal tester (Liveco Inc., Burlington, VT, USA) at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. We used the mean strength of the 4 beams in each tooth to compile the mean tensile bond strength for each group, using tooth number as the unit for statistical analysis (N = 10 teeth). Since the normality (Kolmogorow-Smirnoff test) and homoscedasticity assumptions (Levene test) of the tensile strength data appeared to be valid, they were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukeys multiple comparison test, with statistical significance set at = 0.05.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Three central slabs from each group were polished, treated with the 37% phosphoric acid gel for 5 sec, followed by 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, to bring the resin-dentin interfaces into relief. Air-dried specimens were sputter-coated with gold/palladium and examined by means of a field-emission SEM (XL-30 FEG; Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) operated at 5 kV.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Four central slabs from each group were examined for silver nanoleakage within the dentin hybrid layers, according to a method previously described (Tay et al., 2002). Undemineralized, epoxy-resin-embedded, 90- to 100-nm-thick sections were examined, without further staining, by a TEM (JEM-1230, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 80 kV.
The remaining 4 central slabs from each group were completely demineralized in 17% EDTA and embedded in epoxy resin. From 70- to 80-nm-thick sections were stained in 1% phosphotungstic acid and 2% uranyl acetate. Images taken at 50,000X magnification were analyzed with Scion Image software (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD, USA) for the percentage area occupied by interfibrillar spaces, and the diameter and D-spacing of the collagen fibrils. Since the data from the 2 experimental groups were similar, they were combined and compared with the control group by Students t test, with = 0.05.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
A significant difference was found between the tensile bond strengths of two-step BisGMA (38.7 ± 3.7 MPa) and three-step BisGMA (46.5 ± 9.2 MPa) to deep coronal dentin (p < 0.05) (Table 2 ). There were no differences between the tensile bond strengths of OptiBond FL (43.2 ± 8.1 MPa) and the two-step BisGMA (p > 0.05), and between the three-step BisGMA and OptiBond FL (p > 0.05). Mixed failures were predominantly observed in all groups.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2. Microtensile Bond Strength of Adhesives, % Area Occupied by Interfibrillar Spaces, and Collagen Fibril Diameter
|
|
Acid-/base-resistant hybrid layers and resin tags in the two-step BisGMA (not shown) and the three-step BisGMA groups (Fig. 2A ) were similar to those identified in OptiBond FL (Fig. 2B ). Nanoleakage distribution within hybrid layers was comparable in the two-step BisGMA (Fig. 2C ), three-step BisGMA (not shown), and OptiBond FL (Fig. 2D ) groups. The mean hybrid layer thickness identified from the TEM images in the two-step BisGMA and three-step BisGMA groups (3.87 ± 0.25 µm) was 20% narrower (p < 0.05) than that in the OptiBond FL (4.82 ± 0.14 µm). High-magnification stained TEM images of the hybrid layers revealed wider interfibrillar spaces in the BisGMA groups (Fig. 2E ) compared with the OptiBond FL group (Fig. 2F ). Image analysis results of the different dimensional attributes within the hybrid layers are summarized in Table 2 .

View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Representative resin-dentin interfaces created by the experimental hydrophobic BisGMA adhesives (A,C,E) and the hydrophilic OptiBond FL adhesive (B,D,F). In both cases, the acid-etched dentin was treated with 2.8% half-neutralized oxalic acid for 1 min, to occlude the dentinal tubules with calcium oxalate crystals prior to bonding under 20 cm of water pressure. (A,B) SEM micrographs of polished, acid-treated, and sodium-hypochlorite-deproteinized resin-dentin interfaces depicting hybrid layers (H) resistant to the acid/base challenge, and resin tags containing trapped calcium oxalate crystals (open arrowheads). D, deep coronal dentin; FA, filled adhesive. The experimental three-step BisGMA adhesive is shown in (A), with the filled adhesive layer consisting of a low-viscosity flowable composite. (C,D) TEM micrographs of unstained, undemineralized silver-infiltrated interfaces showing the extent of nanoleakage in the form of silver deposits (pointers) within the hybrid layers (H). The experimental two-step BisGMA adhesive is shown in (C). D, mineralized dentin; A, unfilled BisGMA adhesive; FA, filled OptiBond FL adhesive; open arrowheads, spaces that were previously occupied by partially dislodged, subsurface calcium oxalate crystals. (E,F) High-magnification TEM views of stained sections showing the dimensions of the collagen fibrils and interfibrillar spaces within the hybrid layers. Wider interfibrillar spaces and more extensive shrinkage of the collagen fibrils were evident when water in the dentin matrix was replaced with ethanol before bonding.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The principle of infiltrating acid-etched dentin with BisGMA is based on: (1) increasing the hydrophobic nature of the bonding substrate as water is replaced by ethanol in the demineralized dentin, and (2) increasing the hydrophilicity of BisGMA as it is solvated in ethanol, so that the dentin primer falls within the miscibility range of the ethanol-saturated collagen matrix. After infiltration of the collagen matrix and evaporation of the ethanol, the BisGMA assumes its original neat hydrophobic characteristics, resulting in a relatively hydrophobic resin-dentin interface. The results of this study indicated that it is possible to utilize the solubility parameter theory to design relatively hydrophobic adhesives for bonding to acid-etched dentin via the ethanol wet-bonding approach, with bond strengths that are comparable with those of a conventional three-step hydrophilic etch-and-rinse adhesive. This led to the acceptance of the first null hypothesis.
The degree of double-bond conversion of neat BisGMA (41.5%) is lower than that of 50/50 BisGMA/TEDGMA (67.3%) (Khatri et al., 2003). Thus, eliminating TEGDMA as a diluent comonomer from the BisGMA primer may be achieved at the expense of reducing the degree of conversion of the polymerized resin within the hybrid layer. This reduction could have resulted in the lower tensile strength observed in the two-step BisGMA adhesive compared with the three-step BisGMA adhesive. For the latter, a better degree of conversion could have been achieved, at least at the top of the hybrid layer, by intermixing with the TEGDMA component of the flowable composite before light-curing of the BisGMA primer. It may be possible to take advantage of more hydrophobic BisGMA diluents that exhibit comparable/higher degrees of conversion, flexural properties, and less water sorption than BisGMA/TEDGMA (Pereira et al., 2002; Khatri et al., 2003; Lu et al., 2005), to design hydrophobic dentin adhesives that are miscible with ethanol-saturated dentin, according to the solubility parameter theory. Water-sensitive fluorescent sensors may also be incorporated into these adhesives to monitor their water sorption characteristics.
The 20% reduction in hybrid layer thickness in the BisGMA groups corresponded well with the 15–20% shrinkage in a macro-hybrid layer model when water in the demineralized dentin was replaced with ethanol (Pashley et al., 2007). The results of this study further revealed that the shrinkage induced by ethanol replacement resulted in an 83% increase in the interfibrillar area and significantly more shrinkage (ca. 20%) in the lateral dimension, but not the axial dimension (i.e., D-spacing), of the collagen fibrils. Thus, the second null hypothesis—that there are no differences among the various dimensional attributes in BisGMA-ethanol wet-bonding or a conventional three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive—has to be rejected. Shrinkage of the collagen fibrils in their lateral dimensions was likely the result of the development of intrafibrillar hydrogen bonding within individual collagen fibrils, since ethanol has a lower capacity to break these hydrogen bonds [ h = 20.0(MPa)1/2] than water [ h = 40.4(MPa)1/2] (Pashley et al., 2007). Increases in interfibrillar volume may have been caused by the disruption of shape-maintaining interfibrillar proteoglycan bridges, the number of which has been reported to decrease proportionally with suspension liquids of decreasing polarity, such as ethanol (Scott and Thomlinson, 1998). The consequences of these previously unreported dimensional changes in ethanol wet-bonding and their potential effects on the longevity of resin-dentin bonds are currently unknown. Shrinkage of the collagen fibrils may restrict intrafibrillar infiltration of the resin monomers, creating an interface between the resin and collagen fibrils. This could have resulted in the presentation of internal porosities within hybrid layers created in the BisGMA groups when these specimens were examined by SEM. We speculate that these internal porosities represent shrinkage artifacts created as the collagen fibrils retracted from the encapsulating resin when they were dehydrated and examined in a high vacuum. Conversely, interfibrillar infiltration of the collagen fibrils by the more hydrophilic resin monomers in the OptiBond FL group could have prevented or minimized these shrinkage artifacts during SEM examination. However, it is prudent to point out that intrafibrillar resin infiltration has never been shown to exist within dentin hybrid layers. Until these important research questions are further investigated, the bonding of BisGMA to acid-etched dentin should be viewed as a proof of concept for hydrophobic dentin-bonding, rather than as the development of a clinically applicable bonding technique.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
This study was supported by R01 grant DE 014911 from the NIDCR, Bethesda, MD, USA (PI David Pashley). The authors graciously acknowledge the technical support of Kelli Agee, Penny Roon, and Robert Smith, and the secretarial support provided by Michelle Barnes.
Received for publication March 23, 2007.
Revision received July 13, 2007.
Accepted for publication July 2, 2007.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Abebe W, Maddux WF (2006). Roles of nitric oxide and prostacyclin in triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA)-induced vasorelaxation. Dent Mater 22:37–44.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Agee KA, Becker TD, Joyce AJ, Rueggeberg FA, Borke JL, Waller JL, et al. (2006). Net expansion of dried demineralized dentin matrix produced by monomer/alcohol saturation and solvent evaporation. J Biomed Mater Res A 79:349–358.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Becker TD, Agee KA, Joyce AP, Rueggeberg FA, Borke JL, Waller JL, et al. (2007). Infiltration/evaporation-induced shrinkage of demineralized dentin by solvated model adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 80:156–165.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bowen RL (1965). Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 44:895–902.
- Brudevold F, Buonocore M, Wileman W (1956). A report on a resin composition capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Dent Res 35:846–851.
- De Munck J, Shirai K, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, et al. (2006). Effect of water storage on the bonding effectiveness of 6 adhesives to Class I cavity dentin. Oper Dent 31:456–465.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Engelmann J, Leyhausen G, Leibfritz D, Geurtsen W (2002). Effect of TEGDMA on the intracellular glutathione concentration of human gingival fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res 63:746–751.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Geurtsen W (1998). Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 106(2Pt2):687–695.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hoy KL (1989). Solubility parameters as a design parameter for water borne polymers and coatings. J Indus Text 19:53–67.
- Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, Svizero N, Carvalho RM, Yiu C, et al. (2005). Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 26:6449–6459.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Janke V, von Neuhoff N, Schlegelberger B, Leyhausen G, Geurtsen W (2003). TEGDMA causes apoptosis in primary human gingival fibroblasts. J Dent Res 82:814–818.
- Khatri CA, Stansbury JW, Schultheisz CR, Antonucci JM (2003). Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of urethane derivatives of Bis-GMA. Dent Mater 19:584–588.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laswell HR, Welk DA, Regenos JW (1971). Attachment of resin restorations to acid pretreated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 82:558–563.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lu H, Stansbury JW, Nie J, Berchtold KA, Bowman CN (2005). Development of highly reactive mono-(meth)acrylates as reactive diluents for dimethacrylate-based dental resin systems. Biomaterials 26:1329–1336.
- Miller RG, Bowles CQ, Chappelow CC, Eick JD (1998). Application of solubility parameter theory to dentin-bonding systems and adhesive strength correlations. J Biomed Mater Res 41:237–243.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Donnelly AM, Agee K, Sword J, Tay FR, et al. (2006). Effects of resin hydrophilicity on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 85:1016–1021.
- Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE (2001). Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 28:1106–1115.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Villanueva R, Tay FR (2001). The use of oxalate to reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations. Am J Dent 14:89–94.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, et al. (2007). From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent 20:7–20.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pereira SG, Nunes TG, Kalachandra S (2002). Low viscosity dimethacrylate comonomer compositions [Bis-GMA and CH3Bis-GMA] for novel dental composites; analysis of the network by stray-field MRI, solid-state NMR and DSC & FTIR. Biomaterials 23:3799–3806.
- Sadek FT, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Tay FR (2007a). Tubular occlusion optimizes bonding of hydrophobic resins to dentin. J Dent Res 86:524–528.
- Sadek FT, Pashley DH, Nishitani Y, Carrilho MR, Donnelly A, Ferrari M, et al. (2007b). Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet bonding technique. J Biomed Mater Res A Jun 28 2007 [Epub ahead of print].
- Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G (2006). Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 85:870–877.
- Scott JE, Thomlinson AM (1998). The structure of interfibrillar proteoglycan bridges (shape modules) in extracellular matrix of fibrous connective tissues and their stability in various chemical environments. J Anat 192(Pt3):391–405.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G (2003). Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 24:655–665.
- Spencer P, Wang Y (2002). Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 62:447–456.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003). Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 69:726–731.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M (2002). Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 81:472–476.
- Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR, et al. (2004). Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength, Biomaterials 25:5789–5796.
- Yiu CK, King NM, Carrilho MR, Sauro S, Rueggeberg FA, Prati C, et al. (2006). Effect of resin hydrophilicity and temperature on water sorption of dental adhesive resins. Biomaterials 27:1695–1703.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 11,
1034-1039 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708601103

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hosaka, Y. Nishitani, J. Tagami, M. Yoshiyama, W.W. Brackett, K.A. Agee, F.R. Tay, and D.H. Pashley
Durability of Resin-Dentin Bonds to Water- vs. Ethanol-saturated Dentin
Journal of Dental Research,
February 1, 2009;
88(2):
146 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|