Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Figure 4. Three-dimensional (3-D) bone morphology and morphometry of osseointegrated bone. (A) A microCT image of the detached tissue from the machined implant at week 4 post-implantation, depicting the trabecular architecture of newly formed bone tissue. (B) A microCT image of the prepared tissue specimen for nano-indentation. The tissue was separated from the week 4 machined implant, embedded in epoxy, and polished as described in the text. The flattened and smoothened bone surface is seen at the lower half of the tissue, where the nano-indentation was perfomed. Magnified microCT images of the tissue separated from the machined surface (C) and acid-etched surface (D). The volume of interest (VOI) for these 2 images was set at 300 µm x 300 µm x 100 µm. (E) Quantitative assessment of 3-D parameters performed in the VOI of 300 µm x 300 µm x 100 µm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Statistical significance, *p < 0.01. (F) Bone morphometry performed in the VOI of 100 µm x 100 µm x 100 µm. Data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 6).

J DENT RES, Vol. 85, No. 6, 560-565 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500616





Right arrow Return to article