Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 4


Figure 4. Induction of β-defensin 2 triggered by TLR2, TLR4, NOD1, or NOD2 ligand in human oral epithelial cells. (a) Human oral epithelial HSC-2 cells were incubated for 8 hrs in the presence or absence of Pam3CSSNA (100 pg/mL), lipid A (100 ng/mL), muramyldipeptide (100 µg/mL), or iE-diaminopimelic acid (100 µg/mL). After incubation, total RNA was extracted, and the mRNA expression of β-defensin 2 was analyzed by real-time PCR. (b) Human oral epithelial HSC-2 cells were incubated for 24 hrs in the presence or absence of Pam3CSSNA (100 pg/mL), lipid A (100 ng/mL), muramyldipeptide (100 µg/mL), or iE-diaminopimelic acid (100 µg/mL). After fixation, cells were treated with anti-β-defensin 2 antiboby and then visualized with Alexa Fluor 488 (green). Nuclei were visualized by being stained with 4',6-diamino-2-phenylindole (blue). Scale bars: 20 µ m. (c) Human oral epithelial HSC-2 cells were incubated for 24 hrs in the presence or absence of Pam3CSSNA (100 pg/mL), lipid A (100 ng/mL), muramyldipeptide (100 µg/mL), or iE-diaminopimelic acid (100 µ g/mL). The expression of β-defensin 2 was assessed by flow cytometry. Thin lines represent the isotype antibody control. The results presented are representative of 4 different experiments demonstrating similar results.

J DENT RES, Vol. 85, No. 6, 524-529 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500609





Right arrow Return to article