Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1. Morphology and viability were changed by compressive force. Phase-contrast microscopic appearance of MG-63 cells under compressive force for 24 hrs. Bar = 100 µm. The compressive force resulted in a change of the morphology of MG-63 cells. The arrangement of the cells became irregular, and several spaces were observed between cells, as compared with control cells. As the compressive force became greater, some atrophic cells began to appear. (A) Control; (B) 1.02 x 10–4 N/cm2; (C) 2.04 x 10–4 N/cm2; (D) 4.08 x 10–4 N/cm2; and (E) 6.12 x 10–4 N/cm2. (F) Viability of MG-63 cells under compressive force. Values represent the mean ± SD of the relative absorbance of 3 experimental samples (exp.) per control sample (cont.). Cell viability was decreased at all levels of compressive force applied for 12 hrs, and there was no significant difference between cell viability at 12 and that at 24 hrs. Greater compressive force tended to inhibit cell viability to a greater extent. Significantly different from controls: * p < 0.05 (Bonferroni/Dunn method); a, vs. control; b, vs. 6.12 x 10–4 N/cm2 (n = 3).

J DENT RES, Vol. 85, No. 3, 240-244 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500307





Right arrow Return to article