Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Payne-Ferreira, T.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Payne-Ferreira, T.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Biological

Fluorosis: A New Model and New Insights

J.D. Bartlett, S.E. Dwyer, E. Beniash, Z. Skobe and T.L. Payne-Ferreira*

Department of Biomineralization and Department of Cytokine Biology, The Forsyth Institute, and Department of Oral and Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, 140 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA;

Correspondence: * corresponding author, tpayne{at}forsyth.org


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fluoride is an effective agent for the prevention of dental caries. However, the mechanism of how excessive fluoride exposure causes fluorosis remains uncertain. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) exhibit periodic tooth replacement throughout their lives, thereby providing continuous access to teeth at developmental stages susceptible to fluoride exposure. Zebrafish teeth do not contain true enamel, but consist of a hard enameloid surface. Therefore, we asked whether zebrafish could be used as a model organism for the study of dental fluorosis. Scanning electron microscopy of fluoride-treated teeth demonstrated that the enameloid was pitted and rough, and FTIR analysis demonstrated that the teeth also contained a significantly higher organic content when compared with untreated controls. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time that decreased expression of an important signaling molecule (Alk8) in tooth development may contribute to the observed fluorotic phenotype, and that increased cell apoptosis may also play a role in the mechanism of fluorosis.

Key Words: apoptosis • cell signaling • fluorosis • tooth development • zebrafish


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Severe enamel defects often result from genetic dysplasias (Gibson et al., 2001). Ameloblasts, however, are particularly vulnerable to transient perturbations in their environment. Fluoride is the 13th most abundant element in the earth’s crust (Whitford, 1989) and is well-known as an effective caries prophylactic (Castioni et al., 1998). However, acute or chronic exposure to fluoride can result in dental (DenBesten and Crenshaw, 1987) and skeletal fluorosis (Boivin et al, 1989). Fluoride ingestion during tooth formation is manifested in the enamel by an increase in protein content and a decrease in overall mineral content (Bhusshry, 1959; DenBesten, 1986; Wright et al., 1996; Zhou et al., 1996). Fluorosis varies in appearance from white striations to stained pitting of the enamel. Numerous studies have been conducted over several decades in an effort to determine the mechanism by which fluoride induces enamel defects. However, a gap exists in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular and biochemical changes that occur in developing teeth in the presence of elevated fluoride levels.

Mammalian models for tooth development have allowed investigators to determine many key signaling molecules and developmental regulatory processes. To date, most fluorosis studies have been performed in mice and rats. Rodents have continuously erupting incisors that manifest every developmental stage of enamel formation. Although the erupted molars remain relatively unchanged, mice or rats exposed to high doses of fluoride for 3 wks or more will have fluorosed chalky-white incisors. This occurs because developing teeth are the most susceptible to fluorosis. In fact, fluorosis is often more severe in permanent teeth than in primary teeth, because, in utero, the placenta partially blocks access of fluoride to the fetus as the primary teeth begin to develop (Whitford, 1996). Thus, developing teeth, such as the continuously erupting incisor, are necessary for fluorosis studies.

In the last decade, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), a small teleost fish, has become a simpler vertebrate model for studies of a variety of developmental processes. Unlike most common laboratory animals, zebrafish are easily maintained and reproduce rapidly, and large numbers of offspring can be raised in a small area. Zebrafish teeth have enameloid rather than true enamel. Enameloid and enamel are both highly mineralized tissues covering the dentin of vertebrate teeth. The inner enamel epithelium (IEE) cells of teleosts elaborate a protein matrix that mineralizes to form this hard covering (Huysseune et al., 1998). The IEE cells of teleosts secrete a collagenous matrix that provides the scaffolding for enameloid, while amelogenin is the major enamel matrix protein. Both the collagen of enameloid and the amelogenin of enamel are broken down and removed as the tissues mineralize, so the resulting product is more than 97% mineral (Prostak and Skobe, 1986).

Zebrafish have 2 sets of pharyngeal teeth, positioned on paired ceratobranchial pharyngeal arches (Fig. 1Go), and are polyphyodont, replacing their teeth continuously throughout their lives. Each of the paired fifth ceratobranchials (cb5) carries several pharyngeal teeth and tooth germs in various stages of development. Enameloid does not naturally accumulate fluoride and does not form fluorapatite (Prostak et al., 1993). Consequently, fluoride in the environment of these developing teeth affects their enameloid formation just as ingestion of excessive amounts of fluoride causes malformation of enamel. Since zebrafish exhibit periodic tooth replacement throughout their lives, we asked if the zebrafish is an appropriate model organism for the study of cell signaling during dental fluorosis.


Figure 1
Figure 1
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Phenotypic effect of fluoride treatment. (A) Ventral view of Alcian-blue-stained cartilages of a 7-dpf zebrafish larva. The first few teeth are located on cb5. (B-D) Adult alizarin-red-stained cb5 arches and higher-magnification images of ankylosed teeth. (E) SEM tooth images from 2-month-old fish that were exposed to the indicated fluoride concentrations for 2 mos prior to tooth removal. Characteristic enameloid pitting is seen at concentrations of 38 ppm F and higher. Top, 20,000X; bottom, 2000X magnification. Abbreviations: cb, ceratobranchial; d, dentin; D, dorsal tooth; dpf, days post-fertilization; e, enameloid; M, Meckel’s cartilage; MD, mediodorsal tooth; p, pulp; V, ventral tooth.

 

    MATERIALS & METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fish Husbandry and Collection of Embryos
Zebrafish were maintained at 28.5°C in a 14-hour light/10-hour dark cycle in the Forsyth Zebrafish Facility. Embryos were collected by natural mating and were maintained at 28.5°C as previously described (Payne et al., 2001a). The Animal Protocol was approved under Animal Welfare Assurance (number 305101).

Fluoride Treatment
A 500-mM (9500 ppm) stock of NaF was diluted in fresh system water to graded concentrations (0, 1.9, 9.5, 19, 28.5, 38, 57, 76, and 95 ppm F). Fish were treated for 8 wks in non-circulating tanks, and water was changed weekly. Four independent batches of fish were treated, with 10 fish for each replicate.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
After fluoride treatment, half of the animals from 3 of the 4 replicates were anesthetized/killed, weighed, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The fifth ceratobranchial arches (cb5) were isolated from these 30 fish, totaling 60 arches. The soft tissues were removed, and arches were dehydrated in acetone. The samples were studied with use of a JEOL 6400 according to standard methods.

Compositional Analysis/Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
Teeth were collected from 10 fluoride-treated (38 ppm) and 10 control animals. The soft tissues were removed, and the teeth were air-dried. At least 7 teeth were removed from each pair of arches, totaling 70 individual teeth, and were pooled for analysis. The spectra of crushed teeth were collected in the one-bounce ATR mode in a Spectrum One FTIR spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer, Boston, MA, USA) equipped with a Universal ATR accessory. The spectra were subjected to a ATR correction algorithm), baseline-corrected, and normalized with Spectrum 5.0 software (Perkin-Elmer).

Apoptosis Assay
Treated fish were collected and fixed as described above. Five fish from each of 3 38-ppm-F replicate treatments were decalcified in 20% sodium citrate/45% formic acid and embedded in paraffin. Apoptosis was detected with use of the ssDNA MAB3299 protocol (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA) as per manufacturer’s directions.

Immunohistochemistry
Histological analysis was performed on decalcified untreated and 38-ppm-fluoride-treated zebrafish sections processed as described above. Immunohistochemical analyses were performed with antibodies to the following proteins: Alk8 at 1:5000 as previously described (Payne et al., 2001b), E-cadherin and beta-catenin at 1:500 (BD Transduction Laboratories, San Jose, CA, USA), and Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) 1:250 (Oncogene, Cambridge, MA, USA). All were detected by means of the VIP Peroxidase Substrate kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Fluoride Causes Specific Enameloid Defects
We exposed zebrafish to increasing concentrations of ambient fluoride to determine if fluoride exposure caused any growth defects that may non-specifically affect tooth formation. Larval fish, 2 mos old, were exposed to fluoride levels of 1.9 ppm to 95 ppm for 8 wks. Concentrations were selected as a range, based upon reported fluoride levels in fresh water (DenBesten and Crenshaw, 1987; Whitford, 1996; Levy, 2003). No significant difference was observed in zebrafish weight, size, or vigor after fluoride exposure (data not shown).

After 8 wks of fluoride treatment, the fifth ceratobranchial arches (cb5) (Fig. 1Go) were isolated, and the teeth were compared with untreated teeth by SEM. Pitting was first seen at 38 ppm. Fluoride treatment resulted in teeth that appeared bumpy and pitted when compared with the smooth surfaces of untreated teeth (Fig. 1Go). Similar patterns of enamel pitting have been seen in human fluorotic teeth under an SEM (Susheela et al., 1999).

Fluoride Alters the Mineral/Protein Ratio of Zebrafish Teeth
We analyzed fluorotic zebrafish teeth by FTIR to determine mineral/protein ratios in normal and fluorotic animals (Fig. 2Go). The ratio between maximum intensities of the major protein absorption peak amide I and the {nu}3 PO4 absorption band was used as a measure of organic content in the teeth. The amide I/PO4 ratio in the untreated teeth (control sample) was 0.33, whereas in the fluoride-treated teeth it was 0.6, indicating that the fluoride-treated teeth had a significantly higher organic content than did the normal teeth. This result is similar to that observed in mammalian fluorosis models (DenBesten, 1986). The FTIR studies did not reveal any significant differences in composition of the mineral phase formed in fluorotic vs. normal teeth.


Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of the control (solid line) and fluoride-treated (dashed line) zebrafish teeth. As a measure of mineral content, the ratios between the maximum height of an amide I absorption band (a major protein absorption) at ~ 1645 cm–1 and a phosphate absorption band at ~ 1020 cm–1 were calculated. The amide I/{nu}3 PO4 ratio in the control sample was 0.33, whereas this ratio in fluoride-treated teeth was 0.6. These results suggest that the fluoride-treated teeth have a much higher organic content than do normal teeth. No significant differences in the mineral phase of the control and experimental teeth were observed.

 
Fluoride Increases Programmed Cell Death in Developing Tooth Germs
The similarity between zebrafish fluorotic enameloid and fluorotic enamel in humans led us to examine ameloblast apoptosis upon fluoride exposure. It has been demonstrated that rat ameloblasts in transition to the early-maturation stage undergo apoptosis, decreasing in number by approximately 25% (Smith and Warshawsky, 1977). We asked if zebrafish tooth cells also undergo natural apoptosis, and if the apoptosis could be increased by fluoride exposure. Apoptosis can be assayed with the use of a monoclonal antibody (MAB) specific for ssDNA, which is a result of apoptosis, and is specific for programmed cell death vs. tissue necrosis (Pycroft et al., 2002). There was significant apoptosis in cells of the developing tooth germs, specifically in the ameloblast-like IEE cells (AM) (Fig. 3Go). Panel 3A shows an untreated section of a 4-month-old zebrafish, with a red box highlighting the location of the pharyngeal teeth. The dark brown nuclear staining in Panels 3E' and 3F' indicates apoptosis in the tooth germs exposed to fluoride, and there are more apoptotic nuclei than in the control teeth (Panels 3B, 3C'). The red asterisks mark apoptotic cells, and, on average, there are 12–18% more apoptotic cells in the fluoride-treated tooth germs than in the untreated tooth germs. Eighteen teeth were examined for each condition. The mean % of apoptotic cells in 0-ppm-F teeth was 9.4% (9.4% ± 0.47 SE), and in 38-ppm-F treated teeth, 27.4% (27.4% ± 0.61 SE), p < 0.001 by t test. Furthermore, the apoptosis was restricted to the pharyngeal region of the fish, with the exception of the normal apoptosis observed in the gut, and the chondrocytes of the gill rays below the mouth.


Figure 3
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Apoptosis assay. Two-month-old fish were placed in either 0-ppm-F water (A,B,C) or 38-ppm-F water (D,E,F) for 4 wks. After 4 wks, ssDNA MAB was used to detect apoptotic nuclei (red asterisks) in the paraffin sections. (Panels A, D) Low magnification of ssDNA-stained paraffin sections. Red box indicates cb5 and its associated pharyngeal teeth. Dark brown nuclear staining indicates apoptosis. (Panels B-C, E-F) 20x magnification of control and NaF-treated fish, respectively. (Panels B'-C') 100x magnification of control (0 ppm) tooth germs. (Panels E'-F') 100x magnification of 38-ppm-F-treated tooth germs. Abbreviations: AM, ameloblast-like IEE cell; d, dentin; G, gut; GR, gill rays; PT, pharyngeal teeth.

 
Fluoride Causes Changes in Levels of TGF-beta Family Signaling in Developing Tooth Germs
Perturbations in growth factor signals, specifically BMPs, can lead to apoptosis, which prompted us to perform an initial analysis of cell signaling in fluorotic teeth. Alk8 is a zebrafish type II TGF-beta receptor that signals through BMP pathways (Payne et al., 2001a) and is involved in tooth development (Payne et al,, 2001b; Perrino and Yelick, 2004). Upon exposure to fluoride, developing tooth germs exhibited a decreased level of Alk8 when compared with untreated tooth germs (Figs. 4BGo, 4AGo). The loss of Alk8 expression was limited to the ameloblast-like IEE cells surrounding the bell-stage tooth germ, whereas Alk8 was expressed normally in the surrounding crypt epithelium, and in other non-tooth tissues. Defects in cell adhesion may also result in apoptosis; however, analysis of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin revealed no change of expression in fluoride-treated tooth germs (Figs. 4CGo, 4DGo). Wnt signaling has also been demonstrated to affect apoptosis, so we examined components of the Wnt signaling pathway: beta-catenin and APC (data not shown). Expression of these proteins did not change upon fluoride exposure.


Figure 4
View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Paraffin sections of 4-month-old zebrafish pharyngeal teeth stained with anti-Alk8 polyclonal antibody, and E-cadherin monoclonal antibody. (A,C) Untreated. (B,D) 38-ppm-fluoride-treated. Alk8 is present on the surfaces of the IEE cells, as is E-cadherin. The arrowhead in panels A and B indicates later-stage IEE cells, and the asterisks in the E-cadherin sections (C and D) indicate early-stage tooth germs and more uniform staining of the less mature IEE cells. Abbreviations: am, ameloblast-like IEE cell; ce, crypt epithelium; D, dentin; T, bell-stage tooth.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Dental fluorosis specifically affects developing tooth germs, which, in mammalian models, develop slowly and are few. Zebrafish ameloblast-like IEE cells form enameloid, which, when completely mineralized, has properties similar to those of mammalian enamel. To determine if the zebrafish is a good animal model for dental fluorosis, we compared controls and fluoride-treated zebrafish teeth for enameloid defects, enameloid organic content, apoptosis, and expression of cell-signaling molecules.

We demonstrate that zebrafish teeth display fluorotic defects similar to those observed in mice, rats, and humans. Compositional analysis revealed that zebrafish fluorosis was concomitant with decreased mineral content and increased protein levels, which is similar to fluorosis observed in mammals. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time, by use of the zebrafish model, that decreased expression of cell-signaling molecules in tooth development may contribute to the observed fluorotic phenotype, and, furthermore, that increased apoptosis may also play a role.

The major events relevant to early enamel mineralization are: secretion of matrix proteins and proteases into the enamel matrix, and transport of ions and organic matter to and from the enamel matrix (Aoba and Fejerskov, 2002). Transition to the early-maturation stage is the first point at which significant programmed cell death (apoptosis) has been shown to reduce the number of ameloblasts (Smith and Warshawsky, 1977; Nishikawa and Sasaki, 1995). Numerous signaling cascades—including the expression of Bmps, Wnts, Fgfs and Hh—contribute to mammalian tooth development and are localized at sites of epithelial-mesenchymal cell interaction (Thesleff and Nieminen, 1996). Recently, the roles of several Fgfs in zebrafish tooth development have been demonstrated (Jackman et al., 2004), and work in this laboratory has shown that TGF-beta signaling is also required for normal tooth formation (Payne et al., 2001b). The signals relayed by Wnts, BMPs, and TGF-beta have also been shown to be involved in apoptotic events (for review, see Thesleff, 2003). The mechanism by which normal ameloblast apoptosis is controlled is not known. However, recent studies have indicated that tightly regulated gradients of signaling are critical for cell differentiation and apoptotic control. Abnormal levels of BMPs and Wnts, either elevated or reduced, can result in apoptosis, due to a poorly established cell-signal field (Wall and Hogan, 1995; Solloway and Robertson, 1999; Payne-Ferreira and Yelick, 2003).

Recently, a transgenic mouse that over-expresses wnt3 in tooth epithelia was shown to have enamel defects that were hypothesized to be the result of elevated ameloblast apoptosis (Millar et al., 2003). Similarly, Alk8, which acts through BMP pathways, when dramatically down-regulated, results in decreased bmp2b-4 activity and increased apoptosis in developing embryos and cartilage elements (Payne-Ferreira and Yelick, 2003). We demonstrate that fluoride treatment of zebrafish teeth results in increased apoptosis and decreased Alk8 expression. This observed apoptosis may reflect a perturbed gradient of BMP signaling and inappropriate growth cues that culminate in programmed cell death.

Based on our results—that include analysis of enameloid defects, enameloid organic composition, apoptosis, and Alk8 expression—we propose that the zebrafish is a useful model for the study of fluorosis. The fact that the fluorotic defects in zebrafish collagen-based mineralized tissue are similar to enamel fluorosis suggests that defects in mineralization may be dependent on a ‘common’ event, such as growth factor signaling cascades, which are highly conserved across species. The data obtained from zebrafish can then be used in well-defined mammalian studies to give us a more thorough understanding of the enamel defects caused by excess fluoride. Future studies will address the roles of Alk8 and other TGF-beta signaling molecules during dental fluorosis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Loic Fabricant for expert care of the zebrafish facility, and Dr. Pamela Yelick for the Alk8 antibody. This work was supported by NIDCR grants K22 DE 14683-2 (T.L.F) and DE14084 and DE13237 (J.D.B).

Received for publication June 4, 2004. Revision received May 13, 2005. Accepted for publication May 24, 2005.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS & METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  • Aoba T, Fejerskov O (2002). Dental fluorosis: chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:155–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Bhusshry BR (1959). Chemical and physical studies of enamel from human teeth. IV. Density and nitrogen content of mottled enamel. J Dent Res 38:369–373.
  • Boivin G, Chavassieux P, Chapuy MC, Baud CA, Meunier PJ (1989). Skeletal fluorosis: histomorphometric analysis of bone changes and bone fluoride content in 29 patients. Bone 10:89–99.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Castioni NV, Baehni PC, Gurney R (1998). Current status in oral fluoride pharmacokinetics and implications for the prophylaxis against dental caries. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 45:101–111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • DenBesten PK (1986). Effects of fluoride on protein secretion and removal during enamel development in the rat. J Dent Res 65:1272–1277.
  • DenBesten PK, Crenshaw MA (1987). Studies on the changes in developing enamel caused by ingestion of high levels of fluoride in the rat. Adv Dent Res 1:176–180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Gibson CW, Yuan ZA, Hall B, Longenecker G, Chen E, Thyagarajan T, et al. (2001). Amelogenin-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype. J Biol Chem 276:31871–3195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Huysseune A, Van der Heyden C, Sire JY (1998). Early development of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) pharyngeal dentition (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Anat Embryol 198:289–305.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jackman WR, Draper BW, Stock DW (2004). Fgf signaling is required for zebrafish tooth development. Dev Biol 274:139–157.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Levy SM (2003). An update on fluorides and fluorosis. J Can Dent Assoc 69:286–291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Millar SE, Koyama E, Reddy ST, Andl T, Gaddabara T, Piddington R, et al. (2003). Over- and ectopic expression of Wnt3 causes progressive loss of ameloblasts in postnatal mouse incisor teeth. Connect Tissue Res 44(Suppl 1):124–129.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Nishikawa S, Sasaki F (1995). DNA localization in nuclear fragments of apoptotic ameloblasts using anti-DNA immunoelectron microscopy: programmed cell death of ameloblasts. Histochem Cell Biol 104:151–159.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Payne TL, Postlethwait JH, Yelick PC (2001a). Functional characterization and genetic mapping of alk8. Mech Dev 100:275–289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Payne TL, Skobe Z, Yelick PC (2001b). Regulation of tooth development by novel type I TGF-beta family member receptor Alk8. J Dent Res 80:1968–1973.
  • Payne-Ferreira TL, Yelick PC (2003). Alk8 is required for neural crest cell formation and development of pharyngeal arch cartilages. Dev Dyn 228:683–696.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Perrino MA, Yelick PC (2004). Immunolocalization of Alk8 during replacement tooth development in zebrafish. Cells Tissues Org 176:17–27.
  • Prostak K, Skobe Z (1986). Ultrastructure of the dental epithelium during enameloid mineralization in a teleost fish, Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum. Arch Oral Biol 31:73–85.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Prostak KS, Seifert P, Skobe Z (1993). Enameloid formation in two tetraodontiform fish species with high and low fluoride content in enameloid. Arch Oral Biol 38:1031–1044.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Pycroft JM, Hann A , Moxham BJ (2002). Apoptosis in the connective tissues of the periodontal ligament and gingivae of rat incisor and molar teeth at various stages of development. Connect Tissue Res 43:265–279.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Smith CE, Warshawsky H (1977). Quantitative analysis of cell turnover in enamel organ of the rat incisor. Evidence for ameloblast death immediately after enamel matrix secretion. Anat Rec 187:63–98.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Solloway MJ, Robertson EJ (1999). Early embryonic lethality in Bmp5;Bmp7 double mutant mice suggests functional redundancy within the 60A subgroup. Development 126:1753–1768.[Abstract]
  • Susheela A, Bhatnagar M, Gnanasundram N, Saraswathy TR (1999). Structural aberrations in fluorosed human teeth: biochemical and scanning electron microscopic studies. Curr Sci 77:1677–1681.
  • Thesleff I (2003). Developmental biology and building a tooth (review). Quintessence Int 34:613–620.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thesleff I, Nieminen P (1996). Tooth morphogenesis and cell differentiation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8:844–850.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wall NA, Hogan BL (1995). Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-4 (Bmp-4), bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7), fibroblast growth factor-8 (FGF-8) and sonic hedgehog (SHH) during branchial arch development in the chick. Mech Dev 53:383–392.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Whitford GM (1989). The metabolism and toxicity of fluoride. In: Monographs in oral science. Vol 13. Myers HM, editor. Basel: Karger, p. 159.
  • Whitford GM (1996). The metabolism and toxicity of fluoride. 2nd ed. In: Monographs in oral sciences. Myers HM, editor. New York: Karger, pp. 1–156.
  • Wright JT, Chen SC, Hall KI, Yamauchi M, Bawden JW (1996). Protein characterization of fluorosed human enamel. J Dent Res 75:1936–1941.
  • Zhou R, Zaki AE, Eisenmann DR (1996). Morphometry and autoradiography of altered rat enamel protein processing due to chronic exposure to fluoride. Arch Oral Biol 41:739–747.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 9, 832-836 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400910


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JDRHome page
A.L.J.J. Bronckers, D.M. Lyaruu, and P.K. DenBesten
The Impact of Fluoride on Ameloblasts and the Mechanisms of Enamel Fluorosis
Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 2009; 88(10): 877 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
H. Karube, G. Nishitai, K. Inageda, H. Kurosu, and M. Matsuoka
NaF Activates MAPKs and Induces Apoptosis in Odontoblast-like Cells
Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 2009; 88(5): 461 - 465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Payne-Ferreira, T.L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartlett, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Payne-Ferreira, T.L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?