Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 1


Figure 1. Design of the custom-made distractor (A), surgical procedure (B), radiographs before and after distraction (C,D), occlusal view of the experimental mandible (E), gross view of the distracted animal (F), and photomicrographs from H&E-stained sections from control (G,H), and groups at wk 0 (I,J), 1 wk (K,L), 2 wks (M,N), 4 wks (O,P), and 8 wks (Q,R) of the different consolidation periods are indicated. An arrow in C and solid lines in D, I, K, and M indicate the osteotomy line. An arrow in E indicates the asymmetrical occlusal attrition of the molars in experimental animals. An arrow in F indicates the midline deviation in experimental animals after distraction. OB, original bone; RB, regenerated bone; DG, distraction gap; Fi, fibrovascular tissue; Mar, marginal area; and Mid, central zone of the distraction gap. Original magnification in G, I, K, M, O, and Q, x1.6 (bar = 1.5 mm); and in H, J, L, N, P, and R, x20 (bar = 100 µm). All experiments were performed in triplicate (N = 3).

J DENT RES, Vol. 84, No. 11, 1010-1015 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508401108





Right arrow Return to article