Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


Figure 2. Phosphorylation of FoxO family members in response to serum and stretch in hGF. (A) hGF were cultured in serum-free medium for 24 hrs prior to stimulation. Cells were then stimulated with 10% FBS for the times indicated (in min). A 20-µg quantity of total cellular proteins was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with phospho-specific FoxO1/FoxO4 antibody (upper panels) or actin (lower panel). The upper panels represent different film exposure times. (B) hGF were cultured in serum-free medium for 24 hrs prior to stimulation. Cells were then subjected to stretch for the times indicated (in min). A 20-µg quantity of total cellular proteins was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with phospho-specific FoxO1/FoxO4 antibody (upper panel) or total FoxO1/FoxO4 antibody (lower panel). (C) Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated FoxO1 normalized to FoxO1 for two independent stretch experiments (represented as fold induction over static controls) (N = 2; 1 min – 1.49 ± 0.09; 5 min – 1.82 ± 0.014; 10 min – 2.37 ± 0.05; 30 min – 3.65 ± 0.28; 60 min – 4.50 ± 0.41).

J DENT RES, Vol. 83, No. 8, 596-601 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300803





Right arrow Return to article