| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Altered pH Regulation During Enamel Development in the Cystic Fibrosis Mouse IncisorDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Brauer Hall CB 7450, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA; Correspondence: * corresponding author, tim_wright{at}dentistry.unc.edu
Regulation of pH is necessary to the production of an environment conducive to enamel growth and mineralization. We hypothesize that abnormal extracellular pH in the enamel matrix of mice with the cystic fibrosis gene knocked out (CF mice) results in altered enamel mineralization. The enamel matrix pH during amelogenesis was studied in 10 normal and 10 CF mice. Freshly dissected incisors were immersed in pH indicator or glyoxal bis (2-hydro-xyanil) (GBHA). The normal mouse enamel matrix pH was generally higher and modulated differently than did the CF mouse enamel. GBHA staining showed that normal mice had 2 well-demarcated bands in the maturation zone that correlated to the neutral pH zones, while CF mice showed no staining. These results indicate that CFTR plays a role in pH regulation during enamel development and that a reduced pH results in a lack of calcium influx during enamel maturation and hypomineralization of the CF incisor enamel.
Key Words: CFTR pH amelogenesis ameloblast enamel mineralization calcium
The enamel-producing ameloblast cells originate from ectoderm and perform multiple functions—including matrix secretion, matrix processing, and regulation of ion movement—during enamel development. Enamel formation can be divided into secretory, transition, and maturation stages, based on the unique developmental processes taking place temporally (Robinson et al., 1978). As the ameloblasts function changes during each of these developmental stages, it changes morphology and function to control the enamel extracellular matrix and its environment, thereby regulating enamel deposition and mineralization. Cystic fibrosis (CF), the most common autosomal-recessive disease among Caucasians, is characterized by severely altered function of absorbing and secreting epithelia (Boat et al., 1989). The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a cAMP-activated chloride channel that is defective in CF. Moreover, CFTR is thought to control the function of other membrane conductance systems (Kunzelmann and Schreiber, 1999). CFTR regulates the carbonic acid buffer system anions to control the cytosolic and extracellular pH in lung, kidney, and intestine (Illek et al., 1998). Carbonic acid buffer anions play an instrumental role in numerous vital processes in animal cells and tissues (Kunzelmann and Schreiber, 1999). It has been proposed that carbonic acid buffering anions serve as the main buffering system in developing enamel (Smith, 1998). Regulation of pH during enamel mineralization is considered to be essential for normal apatite deposition and crystallite growth. The net pH in developing enamel is neutral during the secretory stage, while maturation-stage enamel matrix alternates between a neutral and an acid pH. In a simple yet convincing study with a universal staining pH indicator, the full thickness of developing enamel matrix was shown to modulate between neutral and acid pH (Sasaki et al., 1991). The acidic and neutral zones modulated in relation to the ruffle-ended and smooth-ended ameloblasts. It is assumed that each ameloblast modulation cycle begins when a group of ameloblasts starts to create the ruffle border and ends after the ameloblasts are smooth-ended (Smith et al., 1987). The net pH in the developing enamel matrix is thus closely related to the function and morphology of ameloblasts (Takagi et al., 1998). Early in enamel maturation, most of the organic enamel matrix is processed extracellularly into diffusible small molecules and absorbed, leaving considerable fluid-filled space around the individual apatite crystals (Robinson et al., 1979). Subsequent apatite crystal growth involves the massive discharge of protons and the tight regulation of an appropriate physiological pH. Not only must there be physiologic mechanisms in place to neutralize the massive proton release during mineralization, but pH regulation may also play a role in proteinase optimization, and as a trigger for ameloblast modulation from smooth- to ruffle-ended phenotypes (Smith et al., 1996; Smith, 1998). Although the CF mouse was developed for study of the pathological processes and treatments of CF in humans, it also appears to be a promising model for the investigation of abnormal enamel development. Molecular studies show that the CFTR gene is expressed in developing teeth and other mineralized tissues (Sui et al., 2001; Arquitt et al., 2002). Interestingly, CF mice have markedly hypomineralized incisor enamel (CF enamel mineral per volume mean = 51% vs. normal mouse enamel = 80% mineral per volume) and have retention of enamel matrix protein (Wright et al., 1996a,b). Therefore, we hypothesize that altered pH regulation in the CF mouse results from loss of CFTR function and leads to abnormal enamel mineralization. CF mice were used to investigate the relationship between the net pH of enamel and enamel development.
All animals were managed according to an IACUC-approved protocol. Ten adult C57BL6 mice and 10 CF-knockout mice (Snouwaert et al., 1992) were divided into control and experimental groups, respectively. The mice were all adults ranging in age from 30 to 100 days. The animals were killed by CO2 inhalation. The upper and lower incisors were immediately dissected, and the enamel organ was removed by being gently wiped with gauze moistened with ice-cold distilled water to expose the whole enamel surface. The exposed enamel was air-dried to reveal the opaque zone denoting the transition stage to serve as a developmental marker and landmark. One upper and one lower incisor were immediately immersed in pH indicator solution (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) for 1–2 min. The contralateral incisors were stained with GBHA for 4 min at room temperature in 100 mL of a 75% ethanol solution containing 0.87 g of GBHA (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.35 g NaOH, pH 13 (McKee and Warshawsky, 1989). GBHA is a calcium-chelator dye that stains non-crystal-bound calcium (McKee and Warshawsky, 1989). After being stained, the incisors were rinsed briefly in 75% ethanol and allowed to air-dry at room temperature. The stained incisors were observed under a dissecting light microscope, compared with the standard pH indicator, and photographed.
pH Evaluation The distance between the apical end of the incisor and the transition zone appeared similar in the CF and wild-type mice, indicating a similar duration of the secretory stage of development in both animal types. The most apical secretory enamel had a pH close to 6.8, staining light green (Fig. 1A
The maturation zone of normal teeth began with an acidic pH staining yellow, followed by a diffuse area staining light green. This pattern was then repeated, producing a pH-staining pattern in normal teeth of 2 yellow bands corresponding to pH 6.1–6.5 and 2 light green stripes corresponding to pH 7.0 (Fig. 1A
GBHA Evaluation
The results of the present study indicate that hypomineralized enamel on the CF mouse mandibular incisor (Wright et al., 1996a) has a reduced enamel matrix pH during development that likely disrupts the normal crystal growth and protein processing functions necessary for optimal enamel formation. During enamel mineralization, the actively growing enamel hydroxyapatite crystallites release about 8 hydrogen ions for every new unit cell of hydroxyapatite laid down (Simmer and Fincham, 1995). Mineral deposition occurs at neutral or near-neutral pH conditions, with acidic conditions causing a lack of mineral deposition. When the enamel matrix pH reaches a critically low level, there will actually be mineral loss. Additionally, acidic conditions are generally inhibitory to most enamel proteinases and could result in altered amelogenin or other enamel matrix protein processing (Smith et al., 1996). Therefore, removal of the hydrogen ions released by hydroxypatite is a basic requirement for mineralization to proceed. The reduced pH observed in this study during the maturation stage likely alters the normal process of mineral growth during the maturation stage, resulting in the hypomineralization of CF mouse incisor enamel. Previous studies in rats have shown a developmental defect in enamel mineralization that results from altered pH secondary to respiratory acidosis (Whitford and Angmar-Månsson, 1995). It is possible that enamel defects associated with conditions that affect pH (e.g., inflammation from dental abscess, acidosis resulting from hypoxia, or other conditions) could result from enamel hypomineralization secondary to changes during enamel maturation caused by an acidic environment. Studies of CFTR in other epithelial cells, such as respiratory epithelium, show that it is involved in regulating pH through several mechanisms. CFTR expression in the developing murine incisor has been shown previously (Arquitt et al., 2002), and, based on the present study, we suggest that CFTR could play a similar role in pH regulation during enamel formation. Although a central function of CFTR expression in tissues is the secretion of fluid containing Cl– and HCO3–, CFTR also functions to regulate other membrane conductances (Kunzelmann and Schreiber, 1999). The major mechanism for the transport of HCO3– across the basolateral membrane is via the electrogenic Na+:HCO3– co-transporter (Aronson et al., 1991). Stimulation of the Na+:HCO3– co-transporter by cAMP is due to the generation of a favorable electrical potential that results from membrane depolarization by Cl– secreted through CFTR (Soleimani and Burnham, 2000). Expression of CFTR in the plasma membrane is required for regulation of the Cl–/HCO3– exchanger (Hogan et al., 1997). Mutations in the CFTR gene altered Cl–/HCO3– exchanger activity independent of the CFTR mutations effect on Cl– channel activity (Lee et al., 1999). Taken together, these studies indicate that CFTR is critical for the regulation of HCO3– in cells and pH regulation.
Ameloblasts and other epithelial cells may function similarly and use CFTR as a regulator of HCO3– transport and pH (Fig. 3
Ameloblasts are a unique cell type that, unlike respiratory epithelia cells, change their morphology and function during their life cycle. For example, ruffle-ended ameloblasts do not allow ions to pass directly across the cell membranes and have tight junctional complexes to adjacent ameloblasts, preventing incursion of ions between the cells (Prostak and Skobe, 1996). Therefore, HCO3– cannot diffuse from the extracellular fluid through the ameloblast layer to the enamel matrix fluid during the ruffle-ended phase. If HCO3– is not available to the enamel matrix via the extracellular route (between ameloblasts), the transcellular transport system offers a possible mechanism by which HCO3– is translated from the extracellular fluid compartment to the enamel matrix. However, the translocation of HCO3– from the extracellular fluid compartment into the enamel layer during enamel formation is not well-understood. Based on our observation of lower enamel pH in the CF mouse, we suggest that the mutated CFTR down-regulates the activation of basolateral Na+:HCO3– co-transporter and decreases the capability of the HCO3– buffer system in developing enamel. The number of cycles that ameloblasts modulate between RA and SA phenotypes varies between species and is likely related, at least in part, to the size of the tooth being formed. In the normal mouse, we found 2 GBHA bands, whereas the mandibular rat incisor normally has 4bands (Smith et al., 1987). The fine strips observed in both the normal and CFTR teeth likely result from the cyclical nature of enamel formation and are thus analogous to those seen in rat teeth (McKee et al., 1989). Abnormal pH regulation in the CF mouse incisor and a lack of GBHA staining suggest that the ameloblasts do not modulate through the smooth-ended morphology associated with a more neutral pH and an altered mechanism of calcium infusion to the enamel matrix considered critical for normal enamel maturation (Takano et al., 1983). The CF maturation-stage ameloblasts lose their tall columnar morphology shortly after the secretory stage and take on a more cuboidal morphology during maturation (Wright et al., 1996b). While it has been suggested that reaching a critically low pH could serve as a trigger for the RA to modulate to a leakier SA morphology (Smith, 1998), the CF mouse ameloblasts maintain a low pH and do not modulate to a morphology associated with GBHA staining (i.e., SA). Mice lacking the CFTR protein have an altered development of their incisor enamel, while the molars appear to have normal enamel formation (Gawenis et al., 2001). Molecular studies with reverse-transcriptase/polymerase chain-reaction show that CFTR is expressed in developing molars (Sui et al., 2001). The difference between the incisors (hypomineralized enamel) and molars (normal enamel) could be related to the speed and continual development in incisors that make these teeth susceptible to abnormal development secondary to a lack of CFTR. The increased rate and continued enamel formation in the mouse incisor are associated with greater and prolonged liberation of protons during enamel mineralization and the need for robust and stringent pH regulation. The loss of CFTR function in the mouse incisor results in a loss of pH regulation, causing increased retention of enamel matrix proteins and a decreased mineralization of the enamel (Wright et al., 1996a,b). This study provides further evidence that CFTR plays an important role in pH regulation during the maturation stage of enamel formation and suggests that it is especially critical in the rapidly and continuously growing mouse incisor.
We thank Dr. Barbara Grubb at the University of North Carolina for generously providing the CF mice for this study, which was supported by NIDCR Grant #1-RO1 DE12879. Received for publication June 14, 2002. Revision received January 30, 2003. Accepted for publication February 5, 2003.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 82, No. 5,
388-392 (2003) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




