| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Diurnal Variation in the Response of the Mandible to Orthopedic Force
1 Division of Orthodontics, Department of Life-Long Oral Health Science, and Correspondence: * corresponding author, da-yama{at}mail.cc.tohoku.ac.jp
Bone and cartilage metabolism is known to be more active during rest than during periods of activity. The purpose of this study was to examine the hypothesis that mandibular retractive force could be more effective when applied to rats during rest. Mandibular retractive force caused a considerable reduction in the condylar length in experimental groups, and the magnitude of this reduction was greater in the Light-period (08:00-20:00) group than in the Dark-period (20:00-08:00) group. The differentiation and proliferation of chondrocytes were inhibited in animals in the Light-period group, compared with those in the Dark-period group. These results suggest that the orthopedic effects of mandibular retractive force vary depending on the time of day the force is applied, and that such force may be more effective while animals are resting than while they are active.
Key Words: diurnal variation • orthopedic effect • mandibular condylar cartilage • proliferation • collagen
Diurnal variation is an essential feature of bone and cartilage metabolism. Various parameters—including plasma calcium and phosphate (Markowitz et al., 1981; Calvo et al., 1991), osteocalcin (Nielsen, 1994), degraded peptides of collagen (Greenspan et al., 1997; Ohtsuka et al., 1998), parathyroid hormone, and growth hormone (Jubiz et al., 1972; Calvo et al., 1991)—have been shown to fluctuate according to diurnal rhythms. Diurnal variations have also been reported in bone and cartilage formation (Simmons, 1962, 1992; Simmons and Nichols, 1966; Roberts et al., 1979; Petrovic et al., 1981; Stutzmann and Petrovic, 1984; Mühlbauer and Fleisch, 1990; Yosipovitch et al., 1995). In mandibular condylar cartilage, diurnal variations in cellular proliferation and collagen synthesis have been shown in growing rats (Oudet et al., 1984; Saeki, 1995). Recently, as the basic mechanisms of the "biological clock" have been explored, diurnal variations in the biological response to various therapies have been considered to enhance the treatment outcome (Lemmer, 1999). Even in the field of orthodontics, Oudet et al. (1984) demonstrated that a mandibular protrusive appliance accelerated mandibular growth in rats when the appliance was applied during rest rather than during periods of activity. Our previous studies have also shown that orthodontic tooth movement was more effectively achieved when force was applied during rest in rats (Igarashi et al., 1998; Miyoshi et al., 2001). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is any difference in orthopedic effect when mandibular retractive force is applied at different times of day. Overall, we tested the hypothesis that mandibular retractive force can more effectively inhibit condylar growth and the differentiation and proliferation of chondrocytes when such force is applied during rest rather than during the active period.
Experimental Animals, Application of Mandibular Retractive Force, and Tissue Preparation Thirty-seven five-week-old male Wistar rats were divided into 1 control and 3 experimental groups. All of the animals were adapted to a 12/12-hr light/dark illumination program (with light from 08:00 to 20:00) for 2 wks. Four animals served as a Control group (n = 4) without force application. The 3 experimental groups consisted of a Whole-day group (n = 9), a Light-period group (n = 12), and a Dark-period group (n = 12), in which animals received mandibular retractive force the whole day, from 08:00 to 20:00, and from 20:00 to 08:00, respectively. A mandibular retractive force of 300 mN was applied bilaterally directly to the mandibular condyle from the symphysis for 21 days according to the method described by Asano (1986), with some modifications. Briefly, elastic bands with a chin cup attached to the incisors were fastened to a plastic collar brace placed around the necks of the animals. All of the animals were supplied with powdered laboratory chow (CA-1, Japan CLEA, Tokyo, Japan) to facilitate food intake. They were weighed every day during the experimental period. At the end of the experimental period, they were killed under pentobarbital anesthesia. Bilateral mandibles with articular discs were dissected, divided into left and right halves, and fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4. The present animal experiment was conducted with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tohoku University, whose guidelines for the use of experimental animals are based on the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care from the National Institutes of Health.
Morphological Analysis of Mandibles
Histological Analysis Samples were further rinsed with 0.01 M PBS, decalcified in 10% EDTA in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4, for 10 wks, rinsed with 0.01 M PBS, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. Three-micrometer-thick standardized sagittal serial sections were cut, deparaffinized, rehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Immunohistochemistry for Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) and Type II and Type X Collagen Immunohistochemistry for type II and type X collagen was performed as described previously (Takahashi et al., 1995; Saitoh et al., 2000). Briefly, after the sections were deparaffinized, they were treated with hyaluronidase for 30 min at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-bovine type II collagen antibody or rabbit anti-rat type X collagen antibody (LSL, Tokyo, Japan) diluted in 0.5% BSA, 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.4. Sections were further incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Bio Source International, Camarillo, CA, USA) at room temperature for 2 hrs, mounted, and observed by fluorescent microscopy (Leitz DMRD, Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany).
Statistical Analysis
Growth of the Animal and Morphometric Analysis of Mandibles The experimental animals weighed less than the control animals throughout the experimental period. At the beginning of the experiment, the mean (± SD) body weight of all of the animals was 116 ± 5 g. At the end of the experimental period, the mean body weight was 174 ± 7 g for the Control group, 108 ± 14 g for the Light-period group, 110 ± 7 g for the Dark-period group, and 98 ± 6 g for the Whole-day group. There were no statistically significant differences in body weight among the experimental groups.
The results of linear and angular measurements are shown in Table 1
Histological Observation The mandibular condylar cartilage can be divided into 5 cell layers, as described by Mizoguchi et al. (1990) and Luder et al. (1988), i.e., fibrous, proliferative, transitional, mature, and hypertrophic layers (Fig. 2A1  ). In the present study, we focused on these layers in the central area, where condylar cartilage articulates with the thinnest part of the articular disc.
In the central area of the condyle, the thickness of the whole cartilage was obviously decreased in all of the experimental groups (Figs. 2B1, 2C1, 2D1  ) compared with that in the Control group (Fig. 2A1). This decrease in thickness was mainly due to the presence of fewer or no mature or hypertrophic cells. The effect in the proliferative and transitional cell layers was not as obvious as that in the mature and hypertrophic layers, although the cell density in these layers seemed to be lower in the experimental groups than in the Control group. These changes appeared to be greater in the Light-period group than in the Dark-period group.
Proliferative Activity of Cartilage Cells
Collagen Immunohistochemistry The results of immunohistochemical staining for type II and type X collagen in the central area are shown in Fig. 2 . In the Control group, well-organized cartilaginous tissue, including mature and hypertrophic cell layers, showed a positive reaction to type II collagen antibody (Fig. 2A2), and the hypertrophic cell layer showed a positive reaction to type X collagen antibody (Fig. 2A3). In the Whole-day group, type II collagen-positive cell layers were thin, and type X collagen-positive layers were not observed (Figs. 2B2, 2B3). Type X collagen was localized in a thin single-cell layered area at the lower borders of cartilaginous layers in the Light-period group (Fig. 2C3), while thicker multi-cell layered cartilaginous tissue reacted to type X collagen antibody in the Dark-period group (Fig. 2D3).
Experimental Procedures In the present experiment, we used a chincap appliance as a mandibular retractive appliance to evaluate the orthopedic effect on mandibular growth and condylar cartilage cell proliferation and differentiation. The application of a chincap in the mandibular incisor area induced bone remodeling, and therefore we did not define any reference point in this area. The observed differences in body weight might have been due to the reduced intake of food in the experimental groups. Since no statistical differences in body weight were observed among the experimental groups, we mainly compared the differences among these groups. It has been reported that type II collagen is a marker of differentiated chondrocytes (Silbermann et al., 1987; Luder et al., 1988; Mizoguchi et al., 1990; Takahashi et al., 1995) and is expressed mainly in the mature and hypertrophic cell layers, but not in the fibrous and proliferative cell layers. Type X collagen is a marker of hypertrophic chondrocytes (Kielty et al., 1985) and is selectively expressed in the hypertrophic cell layer (Ohashi et al., 1997). PCNA is known to be one of the cell-cycle markers expressed throughout the G1 to S phases (Takasaki et al., 1981). Thus, we believe that the present experimental design was able to demonstrate diurnal variations in response to orthopedic effects in the mandible and condylar cartilage in rats.
Growth of the Condyle
Proliferation of Chondrocytes
Differentiation of Chondrocytes Our previous study (Saeki, 1995) showed that collagen synthesis in the mandibular condylar cartilage cells showed clear diurnal variation. When evaluated by autoradiography with 3H-proline, collagen synthetic activity in the light period was twice as high as that in the dark period. Considering that the thickness of the type II and type X collagen-positive layers represents the quantity of deposited molecules, the deposition of type X collagen may be inhibited more than the deposition of type II collagen in the Light-period group. Since the synthesis and deposition of the collagenous matrix occur during the light period rather than during the dark period, the inhibition of active collagen synthesis and secretion during the light period appears to inhibit condylar growth more effectively. In the present study, we clearly demonstrated that the orthopedic effects generated by a mandibular retraction appliance were more effective when applied during the resting period of the animals. The morphological changes observed in the mandible may have been mainly caused by the inhibition of both cell proliferation and matrix deposition in the condylar cartilage. Further investigation is needed to clarify the mechanism underlying the observed variation.
We are grateful to Prof. Manabu Kagayama, Dr. Yasuyuki Sasano, and Dr. Hirotoshi Akita, Division of Oral Molecular Biology, Department of Oral Biology, and Dr. Mie Ohtsuka, Division of Pharmacology, Department of Oral Biology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, for their valuable advice. This research was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid (Nos. 12557180, 13672138, and 14771173) for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan. Received for publication November 20, 2001. Revision received July 2, 2002. Accepted for publication July 26, 2002.
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 81, No. 10,
711-715 (2002) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
