|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Surface Analysis of Etched Molar Enamel by Gas Adsorption
M.F. Orellana1,*,
A.E. Nelson2,
J.P.R. Carey3,
G. Heo4,
D.G Boychuk5 and
P.W. Major4
1 Orofacial Sciences, Division of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, 707 Parnassus Ave., D-1011, Box 0438, San Francisco, CA 94143-0438, USA;
2 Chemical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Canada, and The Dow Chemical Company, Corporate Research and Development, Midland, MI 48674, USA;
3 Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada;
4 Orthodontic Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada; and
5 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Schematic drawing representing the different states in the progression of the gas adsorption method. In the present study, only surface area was calculated (from Micromeritics® Analytical Service catalog, reprinted with permission).
|
|

View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. SEM micrographs showing: (A) type 4 etch pattern, (B) type 5 etch pattern, (C) type 3 etch pattern, and (D) type 1 etch pattern, or "ideal" etch. Each bar represents 60 µm.
|
|

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. BET analysis result plots. (A) Krypton adsorption isotherm of enamel sample #1. (B) BET surface area plot for the same sample.
|
|

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 4. Surface area of enamel samples determined by krypton adsorption and calculated by BET equation.
|
|
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 6,
532-536 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700607

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|