Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Ding, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Estrogen Modulates Cytokine Expression in Human Periodontal Ligament Cells

L. Shu1, S.-M. Guan2, S.-M. Fu1, T. Guo1, M. Cao1 and Y. Ding1,*

1 Department of Orthodontics and
2 Department of Oral Biology, School of Stomatology, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, China


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Dose-dependent effects of 17β-estradiol on cytokine secretion in hPDL cells. The hPDL cells were stimulated by E. coli LPS (20 µg/mL) with or without different concentrations of 17β-estradiol from 10–9 M to 10–7 M for 6 hrs. (a) TNF-{alpha}. (b) IL-1β. (c) IL-6. Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). **P < 0.01 vs. the control group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. the LPS-treated group. {diamondsuit}P < 0.05, {diamondsuit}{diamondsuit}P < 0.01 vs. the LPS+E2 group.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Time-course effects of 17β-estradiol on cytokine production in hPDL cells. The hPDL cells were stimulated by E. coli LPS (20 µg/mL) with or without 17β-estradiol (10–7 M) for 6, 12, 24, or 48 hrs. (A) Secreted cytokine concentration in conditioned medium. (B) Intracellular cytokine level in cell lysates. (a) TNF-{alpha}. (b) IL-1β. (c) IL-6. Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the control group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. the LPS-treated group. {diamondsuit}P < 0.05, {diamondsuit}{diamondsuit}P < 0.01 vs. the LPS+E2 group.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Changes of TNF-{alpha}, IL-1β, and IL-6 mRNA expression in hPDL cells at 6 hrs. The hPDL cells were stimulated by E. coli LPS (20 µg/mL) with or without 17β-estradiol (10–7 M) for 6 hrs. Steady-state mRNA levels were investigated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis (40 cycles), and results were normalized to GAPDH. Results from the control group were arbitrarily set at 1, and each Fig. is representative of 3 separate experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the control group. #P < 0.05 vs. the LPS-treated group. {diamondsuit}P < 0.05, {diamondsuit}{diamondsuit}P < 0.01 vs. the LPS+E2 group.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effects of 17β-estradiol on OPG and RANKL expression in hPDL cells. (A) Both OPG and RANKL mRNA were subjected to real-time PCR analysis after cells were stimulated by LPS (20 µg/mL) with or without 17β-estradiol (10–7 M) for 12, 24, or 48 hrs. (a) OPG mRNA. (b) RANKL mRNA. (c) Ratio of OPG/RANKL mRNA. (B) Secreted OPG and RANKL in conditioned culture media and membrane-bound RANKL in the cell lysates were measured by ELISA at 24, 48, and 72 hrs. (a) Secreted OPG. (b) Membrane-bound RANKL. (c) Soluble RANKL. Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 12). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. the control group. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. the LPS-treated group.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 87, No. 2, 142-147 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910808700214


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?