Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goracci, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferrari, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goracci, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Post Placement Affects Survival of Endodontically Treated Premolars

M. Ferrari*, M.C. Cagidiaco, S. Grandini, M. De Sanctis and C. Goracci

Dipt. Scienze Odontostomatologiche, Policlinico Le Scotte, Viale Bracci, University of Siena, Siena 53100, Italy


Figure 1
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Schematic representations of the various degrees of hard-tissue loss that the tested premolars might exhibit at completion of endodontic treatment. The darker area represents the missing structure in the conditions referred to as (A) 4 coronal walls retained (Group 1, N = 40), (B) 3 walls remaining (Group 2, N = 40), (C) 2 walls maintained (Group 3, N = 40), and (D) only 1 coronal wall preserved (Group 4, N = 40).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier plots by subgroup (A) showed that the survival probability was higher for posted restorations from the six-month recall on. The gap between the two curves became greater as time progressed. Kaplan-Meier plots constructed for the groups defined as 4, 3, 2, and 1 preserved coronal wall (B–F, respectively, N at baseline = 40 in each group) indicated that the probability of tooth failure was higher in the presence of a reduced portion of crown dentin. Also, post placement appeared to contribute more to survival probability the less the coronal structure was retained, since the gap between the "post" and "no post" plots increased as the degree of hard-tissue loss increased.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 8, 729-734 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600808


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?