Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.K.
Right arrow Articles by Zuniga, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Essick, G.K.
Right arrow Articles by Zuniga, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Facial Sensory Re-training on Sensory Thresholds

G.K. Essick1,2,*, C. Phillips3 and J. Zuniga4

1 Department of Prosthodontics,
2 Center for Neurosensory Disorders, and
3 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, 2110 Old Dental Building, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA; and
4 Department of Surgery, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, TX, USA


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Impairment in contact (touch) detection on the chin. Shown are the geometric least-squares means of the impairment ratio with 95% confidence intervals at 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery. Sensory thresholds were obtained 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery on 89, 89, and 88 people in the sensory re-training group and on 89, 90, and 87 people in the ’opening only’ group.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Impairment in two-point discrimination on the chin. Shown are the geometric least-squares means of the impairment ratio with 95% confidence intervals at 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery. Sensory thresholds were obtained 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery on 89, 89, and 88 people in the sensory re-training group and on 90, 91, and 86 people in the ’opening only’ group.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Impairment in two-point perception on the chin. Shown are the geometric least-squares means of the impairment ratio with 95% confidence intervals at 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery. Sensory thresholds were obtained 1, 3, and 6 mos post-surgery on 89, 89, and 88 people in the sensory re-training group and on 91, 92, and 86 people in the ’opening only’ group.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 6, 571-575 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600616


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?