Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera, E.
Right arrow Articles by de la Macorra, J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cabrera, E.
Right arrow Articles by de la Macorra, J.C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Polymerization Shrinkage Influences Microtensile Bond Strength

E. Cabrera and J.C. de la Macorra*

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Complutense University of Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain;


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure. Specimen preparation and microtensile test results. (A) Preparation of specimens. Roots were sectioned (i), and the enamel’s labial aspect was ground flat (g). In Group A (teeth, n = 8), resin composite was built up in an increment (A1), and in Group B (teeth, n = 8), 3 separate composite resin blocks were placed (B1). Restored teeth in both groups were sectioned (A2, B2), and specimens (100 and 39, respectively) were tested in tension. (B) Microtensile test results. Percentages of maximum microtensile bond strength results within each tooth (PMPa), per distance to incisal end of the restoration, in 9 categories (NDistanc). Boxplots show distributions of PMPa (in %) per groups (A,B) and NDistances.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 3, 227-231 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600306
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?