Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teughels, W.
Right arrow Articles by Van Ranst, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teughels, W.
Right arrow Articles by Van Ranst, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Human Cytomegalovirus Enhances A. actinomycetemcomitans Adherence to Cells

W. Teughels1,*, I. Sliepen1, M. Quirynen1, S. Kinder Haake2, J. Van Eldere3, P. Fives-Taylor4 and M. Van Ranst5

1 Catholic University Leuven, Research Group for Microbial Adhesion, Department of Periodontology, Kapucijnenvoer 7, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
2 UCLA, School of Dentistry, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, USA;
3 Catholic University Leuven, Centre for Molecular Diagnostics, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
4 University of Vermont, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Stafford Hall, 95 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, USA; and
5 Catholic University Leuven, Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Minderbroedersstraat 10, 3000 Leuven, Belgium


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. hCMV antigen expression in epithelial cells. HeLa (A) and primary cells (B) were infected with hCMV for 48 hrs. Cells were fixed with ice-cold absolute methanol and blocked with 10% normal goat serum. To detect hCMV IE antigens, we incubated cells with primary mouse antibodies (1:80) recognizing IE (clone E13) (Argene, Varilhes, France), and reacted them with fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Dako, Heverlee, Belgium) at 1:200 dilution. Images were made with an Olympus IX70 confocal microscope. (1) Phase-contrast image, (2) fluorescent image, (3) overlap image showing bright IE-positive nuclei for some epithelial cells.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of hCMV concentration on adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strains to HeLa cells. Cells were exposed to hCMV for 1 hr (MOI range: 10–200) and incubated for an additional 48 hrs. Uninfected cells served as controls. Data are expressed as the proportion of cell-associated bacteria relative to the numbers of bacteria added to the cells initially. Each datapoint represents the mean ± SEM for 4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, hCMV-infected group vs. uninfected controls. #P < 0.05, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strain IDH1705 vs. strains JP2 and ATCC33384 at MOI 200.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Viral pre-infection time and bacterial adherence. (A) Effect of hCMV pre-infection time on adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strains to HeLa cells. Cells were exposed for 1 hr to hCMV (MOI 100) and incubated for an additional 6, 12, 24, or 48 hrs, or were mock-infected for 48 hrs (squares). Uninfected cells served as controls. Data are expressed as the proportion of cell-associated bacteria relative to the numbers of bacteria added to the cells initially. Each datapoint represents the mean ± SEM for 12 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, hCMV-infected group vs. uninfected control; #P < 0.05, 48-hour hCMV-infected group vs. 48-hour mock-infected group; °P < 0.05, 48-hour vs. 24-hour hCMV-infected group. (B) Effect of hCMV pre-infection time on adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strain JP2 to primary cells. Cells were exposed for 1 hr to hCMV or mock preparation (MOI 100) and incubated for an additional 6, 12, 24, or 48 hrs. Uninfected cells served as controls. Data are expressed as the proportion of cell-associated bacteria relative to the numbers of bacteria added to the cells initially. Each datapoint represents the mean ± SEM for 8 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, hCMV- or mock-infected group vs. uninfected control; #P < 0.05, hCMV vs. mock-infected group.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effect of IE-antigen expression on adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strain JP2 to confluent monolayers. HEL and primary cells were exposed for 1 hr to hCMV or the mock preparation (MOI 100) and incubated for 96 hrs. Uninfected cells served as controls. Data are expressed as the proportion of cell-associated bacteria relative to the number of cell-associated bacteria on uninfected control cells (= 100%). Each datapoint represents the mean ± SEM for 6 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, hCMV- or mock-infected group vs. uninfected control; #P < 0.05, hCMV vs. mock-infected group.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 86, No. 2, 175-180 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910708600213


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?