Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Feilzer, A.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hashimoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Feilzer, A.J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Contraction Stress in Dentin Adhesives Bonded to Dentin

M. Hashimoto1,*, A.J. de Gee2, M. Kaga1 and A.J. Feilzer2

1 Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Kita 13, Nishi 7, Kitaku, Sapporo 060–8586, Hokkaido, Japan; and
2 Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), The Netherlands


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Schematic illustration of polymerization contraction stress determination in the tensilometer. The adhesive or adhesive/composite combination was placed between a glass plate of 4-mm thickness and, parallel to it, the pre-treated flat surface of the dentin specimen or sandblasted surface of the steel specimen. The specimens were fixed in a special steel holder and connected to the load cell. The glass plate (of which the surface on the spot for adhesion was sandblasted with Al2O3 and silanized) was mounted to the stationary part of the framework of the tensilometer.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Average contraction stress curves of the 4 adhesives and adhesive/composite combinations between glass and dentin (A,B) and the 4 adhesives between glass and steel (C). With dentin, the number of experiments was n = 12, and with steel, n = 3.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 3. Bar graphs representing the average maximum stress (white bars) and 30 minutes stress values (grey bars) ± SD of the 4 adhesives (A) and adhesive/composite combinations (B) between glass and dentin. n = 12 for each group.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 8, 728-732 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500808
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?