Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goto, T.K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiura, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goto, T.K.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshiura, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Size and Orientation of Masticatory Muscles in Patients with Mandibular Laterognathism

T.K. Goto1,*, S. Nishida2, M. Yahagi3, G.E.J. Langenbach4, Y. Nakamura5, K. Tokumori1, S. Sakai6, H. Yabuuchi6 and K. Yoshiura1

1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan;
2 Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan;
3 Asahi Kasei Information Systems Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan;
4 Department of Functional Anatomy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands;
5 Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan; and
6 Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Methods in size measurements (cross-sectional area, length, and volume) and orientation of the masticatory muscles. (A) Reconstruction of MR images and individual jaw muscles: masseter (green), medial pterygoid (orange), and lateral pterygoid (red). Two different participants are shown, with the patient on the left as an experimental subject and the control on the right. (B) Reconstructed images showing the sagittal angle of the right jaw muscles. Horizontal lines are parallel to the Frankfort horizontal plane. Oblique lines represent the long axes of the muscles. Angle between the two lines describes the sagittal orientation of the muscles. (C) Coronal (masseter and medial pterygoid) and axial (lateral pterygoid) scans, showing the orientation in the respective planes. Horizontal lines are parallel to the Frankfort horizontal plane. Abbreviations: MS, masseter muscle; MP, medial pterygoid muscle; LP, lateral pterygoid muscle.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Maximum cross-sectional areas (cm2), muscle length (mm), muscle volume (cm3), and orientations (°) of masseter, medial, and lateral pterygoid muscles, respectively. Patient group, n = 20, for each deviated or non-deviated side of 20 patients; control group, n = 10 (mean of both sides of 10 people). Dev, deviated side; Non-dev, non-deviated side. *p < 0.05 by t test with Bonferroni. **p < 0.01 by t test with Bonferroni. {dagger}p < 0.01 by paired t test with Bonferroni. Significant differences between each side in patients and controls were seen. A marked difference in muscle volume is evident. Abbreviations: CSA, maximum cross-sectional area (cm2); Length, muscle length (mm); Volume, muscle volume (cm3); Angle, orientation (°).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Normalized graphs (for both maximum cross-sectional area and muscle length) of cross-sectional areas in relation to muscle length. Data points for 20 muscles from both sides of 10 control participants are shown in the right panel. Data points for each deviated or non-deviated side of 20 participants are shown in the left panels. The dispersion of data-points indicates the variation in muscle morphology among participants. The crossbar shows the position at which the maximum cross-sectional area (mean) was located. Numbers in parentheses show the coefficient of variation (COV = SD/mean x 100%) of the relative position of the maximum cross-sectional area.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 6, 552-556 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500614


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?