|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Implant Surface Roughness and Bone Healing: a Systematic Review
M.M. Shalabi1,
A. Gortemaker1,
M.A. Vant Hof2,
J.A. Jansen1,* and
N.H.J. Creugers3
1 Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials,
2 Biostatistics, and
3 Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dentistry 309, College of Dental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Scatter plots of surface roughness-BIC (a), -push out test (b), and -torque test (c) comparisons. Lines connect data within studies. [C] = Cylindrical implants; [S] = Screw implants; [F] = implant site in femur; [H] = implant site in humerus.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. Mean values and 95% Confidence Interval for the slopes of the surface roughness-BIC/torque/push-out test comparisons of the studies evaluated. Asterisks indicate slope-values statistically significant from zero (* = p < 0.01; ** = p < 0.001).
|
|
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 6,
496-500 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500603

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|