Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Chu, S.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P.-N.
Right arrow Articles by Chu, S.-C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Silibinin Inhibits Invasion of Oral Cancer Cells by Suppressing the MAPK Pathway

P.-N. Chen1,2, Y.-S. Hsieh1,a, C.-L. Chiang2, H.-L. Chiou3, S.-F. Yang1 and S.-C. Chu2,*,a

1 Institute of Biochemistry,
3 School of Medical Technology, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Section 1, Chien Kuo N. Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan; and
2 Department of Food Science, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 11 Pu-tzu Lane, Pu-tzu Road, Taichung 406, Taiwan


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. The effects of silibinin on cell invasion, motility, and cell-matrix adhesion of SCC-4 cells. Cells were treated with silibinin at a concentration of 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM for 24 hrs, and were then subjected to analyses for invasion (A), motility (B), and cell-matrix adhesion (C) as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Data represent the mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effects of silibinin on the protein and mRNA levels of proteases and their endogenous inhibitors. Cells were treated with 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM silibinin for 24 hrs. For protein levels, cells were subjected to gelatin zymography, casein zymography, and Western blotting to analyze the activities and levels of MMP-2 (A), u-PA (B), TIMP-2, and PAI-1 (C), respectively, as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Determined activities of these proteins were subsequently quantified by densitometric analysis, with control being 100%, as shown below the gel data. For mRNA levels (D), total RNAs were extracted and subjected to semi-quantitative RT-PCR for MMP-2, TIMP-2, MT1-MMP, u-PA, and PAI-1, with GADPH being an internal control. Data represent the mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. An inhibitory effect of silibinin on the phosphorylation of ERK1/2. (A) Cells were treated with the indicated dose of silibinin (0, 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM) for 24 hrs, and then cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting and immuno-probing with anti-phospho-ERK1/2, anti-phospho-p38, anti-phospho-JNK1/2, or anti-phospho-Akt antibodies. Protein reactivity was visualized with an ECL detection system. For determination of the effects of MEK inhibitor (U0126) and silibinin on the activity of MMP-2 and u-PA and cell invasion, cells were plated in culture dishes and pre-treated with U0126 (10 or 20µM) for 30 min, and then incubated in the presence or absence of silibinin (25 µM) for 24 hrs.Afterward, the culture media were subjected to gelatin and casein zymography to analyze the activities of MMP-2 (B) and u-PA (C), respectively, and cells were subjected to analyses for invasion (D) as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Determined activities of these proteins were subsequently quantified by densitometric analysis, with control being 100% as shown below the gel data. Nuclear extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting and immunoprobing with anti-NF-{kappa}B, c-Jun, c-Fos, or C23 antibodies (E) as described in MATERIALS & METHODS. Data represent the mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. The in vivo anti-metastatic effects of silibinin. After subcutaneous implantation of LLC cells, C57BL/6 mice were treated with corn oil or silibinin as described in MATERIALS & METHODS, and then analyzed for the number of lung metastases (A), the growth of tumors (B), the weight of the primary tumor (C), and body weight (D). The values represent the means ± SD. Comparisons were performed by Student’s t test (*P < 0.05).

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 3, 220-225 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?