Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ratih, D.N.
Right arrow Articles by Messer, H.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ratih, D.N.
Right arrow Articles by Messer, H.H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Minimizing Dentinal Fluid Flow Associated with Gap Formation

D.N. Ratih, J.E.A. Palamara* and H.H. Messer

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Science, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1. Outward fluid flow behavior for 15 min after light-curing of resin composite. Outward fluid flow of liner groups (conventional and light-cured GIC) stopped earlier than that of bonding groups (low-shrinkage and high-shrinkage resin groups), which exhibited continuing outward fluid flow for at least 15 min. Only the mean values (n = 8 teeth per group except for the conventional GIC group, n = 7) are shown for clarity. The standard deviation for each group was typically in the range 10–20% of the mean. LC-GIC = light-cured glass-ionomer cement; C-GIC = conventional glass-ionomer cement; LSC = low-shrinkage composite; HSC = high-shrinkage composite.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2. Scanning electron micrograph of an epoxy replica of the high-shrinkage composite-dentin interface, showing a gap between dentin and resin composite approximately 5 µm in width. D = dentin; C = resin composite.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 11, 1027-1031 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608501110
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?