This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Häggman-Henrikson, B. Articles by Eriksson, P.-O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Häggman-Henrikson, B. Articles by Eriksson, P.-O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Head Immobilization can Impair Jaw Function

¹ Department of Odontology, Clinical Oral Physiology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden, and Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Gävle University, Sweden; and
² Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Umeå University, Sweden

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. The basic set-up for the simultaneous recording of 3-D movements of the mandible and the head by means of a wireless optoelectronic recording system (MacReflex®). Two charge-couple device (CCD) video cameras connected to a sampling computer via a video processor recorded head movements by means of a marker tripod, attached to the bridge of the nose, and mandibular movements by means of a single marker at the center of the chin.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Amplitudes and cycle time with/without head fixation. (a) Head and mandibular movements for one male participant during self-paced continuous maximal jaw-opening/-closing movements recorded in the 2 different test conditions: free, unrestrained movements (grey); and with head fixation (black). Head (b) and mandibular (c) movement amplitudes and cycle duration (d) for the group (n = 12) without (unfilled) and with (hatched) head fixation for the different tasks; continuous maximal jaw-opening/-closing movements at self-paced rate (Cont), at a rate of 50 cycles per min (Cont 50), and during chewing (Chew).

View larger version (38K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Head and mandibular movements for one male participant (no. 2) recorded during self-paced continuous maximal jaw-opening/-closing in different test conditions: (a) free, unrestrained head; and (b) with head-neck fixation. Raw surface EMG recorded from anterior digastric (Dig), masseter (Mass), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and trapezius (Trap) muscles.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Percentage (%) of cycles with muscle activity for each participant (n = 4) and task. Activity for jaw-opening phase without (a) and with (b) head-neck fixation for muscles sternocleidomastoideus (SCM) and trapezius (Trap) for the different tasks: continuous maximal jaw-opening/-closing movements at self-paced rate (Cont), at a rate of 50 cycles per min (Cont 50), and during chewing (Chew). Activity for jaw-closing (SCM) during chewing without (c) and with (d) head-neck fixation. Numbers on x-axis denote the participants.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 11, 1001-1005 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608501105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?