|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Gingival Tissue and Crevicular Fluid Co-operation in Adult Periodontitis
A. Beklen1,2,3,
G. Tüter4,5,
T. Sorsa4,
R. Hanemaaijer6,
I. Virtanen2,
T. Tervahartiala4 and
Y.T. Konttinen1,7,8,*
1 Department of Medicine/Invärtes medicin, Helsinki University Hospital, Biomedicum Helsinki, PO Box 700 (Haartmaninkatu 8), FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland;
2 Institute of Biomedicine/Anatomy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
3 Medico-social, Dental Clinic, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey;
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, HUCH, Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Box 41 FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland;
5 University of Gazi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology, Ankara, Turkey;
6 TNO-Prevention and Health, Leiden, The Netherlands;
7 ORTON Orthopaedic Hospital of the Invalid Foundation, Helsinki, Finland; and
8 COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 1. Western blot and zymography analysis of MMPs in gingival crevicular fluid from adult periodontitis patients and healthy controls. (A) Characterization of various molecular forms of MMP-3, -8, -9 in the GCF samples studied by Western blotting; and (B) characterization of MMP-9 studied by gelatin zymography (11% acrylamide separating gel containing 1 mg/mL gelatin). These experiments were done for seven periodontitis patients and five healthy controls.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 2. MMP-3 staining. (A) Intense immunoreactivity is seen in the adult periodontitis gingival tissue samples (n = 7). The fibroblast marked with an arrow is magnified 4x in the insert. (B) MMP-3 staining is weak in healthy tissue (n = 5), whereas (C) no staining is detected in the negative staining control. Scale bar = 100 µm.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Figure 3. MMP-3, -8, and -9 activity (mean ± SEM) (A) without APMA and (B) with APMA in TNF- -stimulated (+) gingival fibroblasts supernatant at 48 hrs compared with non-stimulated (–) cells. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05. NS = non significant.
|
|
Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 85, No. 1,
59-63 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608500110

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|