This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Matinlinna, J.P. Articles by Vallittu, P.K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Matinlinna, J.P. Articles by Vallittu, P.K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Isocyanato- and Methacryloxysilanes Promote Bis-GMA Adhesion to Titanium

¹ Institute of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials Research, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, FI-20520 Turku, Finland; and
² Vivoxid Ltd., Tykistökatu 4 A, FI-20520 Turku, Finland;

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Molecular structures of silanes, an isocyanato group bonding to a hydroxyl-rich surface, and the shear bond strength results. (a) 3-Isocyanatoproplytriethoxysilane, (b) 3-methacryloyloxypropyltrimethox-silane, (c) a suggested mechanism for the isocyanato group reaction with an inorganic surface, and (d) shear bond strengths of the Bis-GMA resin stubs (N = 10) to titanium with various silanes, silane concentration, and grit-blasting systems (Abbreviations: MPS = 3-methacryloyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane; ICS = 3-isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane).

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. The morphological and chemical SEM/EDS analysis of grit-blasted Ti substrate surfaces. (a) Silica-coated surface. Original magnification x1000. Scale bar (black) = 20 µm. (b) Silica-coated titanium surface showing EDS element distribution in Fig. 2a (red = Al, blue = Ti, green = Si). Original magnification x1000. Scale as above. (c) Alumina-coated Ti surface. Original magnification x1000. Scale bar (black) = 20 µm. (d) Alumina-coated Ti surface showing EDS element distribution in Fig. 2c (red = Al, blue = Ti, green = Si). Original magnification x1000. Scale as above. (e) Cohesive failure in de-bonding the Bis-GMA resin. Silica-coated Ti surface, silanized with 0.1% 3-isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane, after the resin sample was thermocycled and de-bonded (430x magnification). Scale bar (white) = 50 µm.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Activation (hydrolysis) of the experimental silanes. (a) Hydrolysis of 0.1% 3-isocyanatopropyltriethoxysilane. A: t = 0 min, B = 30 min, C = 60 min. X-axis: wave number (cm–1) and Y-axis absorbance A (in arbitrary units). (b) Hydrolysis of 1.0% 3-methacryloyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane. A: t = 0 min, B = 30 min, C = 60 min. X-axis: wave number (cm–1) and Y-axis absorbance A (in arbitrary units).

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 4, 360-364 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400413


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?