Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yabushita, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yabushita, T.
Right arrow Articles by Soma, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Role of Occlusal Vertical Dimension in Spindle Function

T. Yabushita1,2,*, J.L. Zeredo2, K. Toda2 and K. Soma1

1 Orthodontic Science, Department of Orofacial Development and Function, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549; and
2 Division of Integrative Sensory Physiology, Department of Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan;


Figure 1
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the experimental setting. (A) Barbiturate-anesthetized rats had their heads fixed to a stereotaxic frame in the left lateral decubitus. The masseteric nerve was exposed, hooked to an electrode, and preserved in a pool of liquid paraffin. A thread was attached to the mandible, and the masseter muscle was passively stretched by pulling the jaw open. (B) Sinusoidal stretch stimulation was applied with a maximum opening distance of 7.0 mm and a cycle duration of 4.0 sec (jaw-opening and -closing time of 2.0 seconds, followed by an interval of 2.0 sec). For data analysis, the stimulation (jaw-opening/-closing period) was divided into 3 phases (phases 1 to 3).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Typical examples of responses from single masseter muscle spindle units to cyclic sinusoidal stretching. Vertical lines indicate the start of a stretch stimulation (continuous) and the first spike of a spindle unit response (dashed). Muscle spindle units were classified as primary or secondary according to their response patterns. Primary endings (A) discharged during stretch and were silent during release, while secondary endings (B) responded with tonic discharges in proportion to the change of muscle length during the entire stimulation period. Lower tracings show typical primary and secondary unit responses after 15 days of iOVD. Cycle histograms show averaged unit responses over 5 consecutive cycles (bins of 100 ms).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Peak instantaneous frequencies during each phase of stimulation. (A) Primary endings (n = 43). (B) Secondary endings (n = 27). Significantly lower instantaneous frequencies were observed after 5 and 10 days of iOVD in secondary and primary endings, respectively, except for phase 3 in primary endings. Data points represent data averaged from 5 consecutive cycles in each unit. Error bars indicate SD. *Statistical significance vs. control; ANOVA followed by Scheffé’s post hoc test (5% significance level).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Response thresholds in control and iOVD groups. (A) Primary endings (n = 43). (B) Secondary endings (n = 27). Response thresholds were analyzed by the amount of jaw opening required for the first spike to fire. Significantly higher threshold values were obtained after 5 days of iOVD in both primary and secondary endings. Error bars indicate SD. *Statistical significance vs. control; ANOVA followed by Scheffé’s post hoc test (5% significance level).

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 3, 245-249 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?