This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Foster, N. Articles by Preshaw, P.M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Foster, N. Articles by Preshaw, P.M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

VIP Inhibits Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS-induced Immune Responses in Human Monocytes

Oral Microbiology and Host Responses Group, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4BW, UK;

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. CD14 expression and flow cytometric analysis of VitD3-treated THP1 cells. (A) FACS analysis of CD14 expression on THP1 surface; arrows show CD14 expression on the surfaces of pro-monocytic THP1 cells and VitD3-treated monocytic THP1, compared with an isotype control. The histogram is representative of results repeated on at least 5 separate occasions. (B) Population of cells gated prior to FACS analysis (R1) with characteristics of high forward scatter (FSC) (largest cells in population) and low (< 102) side-scatter (non-granular cells).

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. TNF- production by THP1 monocytes. (A) Cells were incubated in medium alone or stimulated with increasing concentrations of Pg LPS for 6 and 24 hrs. All treatments induced significant increases (P < 0.05) in TNF- production compared with that in unstimulated (control) cells. (B) LPS (100 ng/mL)-stimulated cells incubated with and without VIP (10–8 M). TNF- levels were measured by ELISA and compared with unstimulated (control) cells or cells stimulated with phorbol myristate acetate (positive control). Data are presented as means ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05. Similar data were obtained from 3 separate experiments.

View larger version (83K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Subcellular location of transcription factors (NFB or c-Jun) in THP1 monocytes. Cells were analyzed after incubation in medium alone (A,D), following treatment with 100 ng/mL Pg W50 LPS (B,E), and with 100 ng/mL Pg LPS with VIP (10–8 M).(C,F) Fluorescently labeled antibodies were used to detect NFB (green fluorescence) and c-Jun (red fluorescence), and sections were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (blue fluorescence). Each image was taken between 6 and 8 µm through the cells, so that the nuclei could be clearly determined. Scale bar in bottom left corner = 30 µm. Each result was replicated on at least 6 separate occasions.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. CD14 expression on THP-1 monocytes following exposure to LPS. (A) Isotype control (IgG2a. PE). (B) Unstimulated THP1 cells (negative control). (C) THP1 cells stimulated with Pg LPS (100 ng/mL) for 6 hrs. (D) THP1 cells stimulated with LPS and VIP (10–8 M). CD14 expression was determined by flow cytometry. The upper-right-quadrant highly granular cells express CD14, and the upper-left-quadrant low-granular cells express CD14. The figures in the dot-blots represent the proportion of the total cell number in each of these upper quadrants. This experiment is representative of similar results obtained on at least 8 separate occasions.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 11, 999-1004 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508401106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?