Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meisel, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kocher, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CALCIUM COMPOUNDS
*CALCIUM, ELEMENTAL
*MAGNESIUM COMPOUNDS
*MAGNESIUM, ELEMENTAL
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Magnesium Deficiency is Associated with Periodontal Disease

P. Meisel1,*, C. Schwahn2, J. Luedemann3, U. John4, H.K. Kroemer1 and T. Kocher2

1 Department of Pharmacology, 2 Dental Clinics, Unit of Periodontology, 3 Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, and 4 Institute of Epidemiology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University, F.-Loeffler-Str. 23d, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany;


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure. Periodontal parameters in subjects with low and high Mg/Ca ratios. (A) Percentage of sites having a probing depth of sites ≥ 4 mm. (B) Percentage of sites having an attachment loss ≥ 4 mm. A distinction was made between subjects in the lowest quartile (dashed) and those in the uppermost quartile (solid lines). Shown are the fitted lines, including the 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines). A non-linear regression fit to logistic equations was used. (C) Extent in percent of sites ≥ 4 mm of probing depth (left panel), of attachment loss ≥ 4 mm (mid-panel), and number of teeth (right panel), and the Mg/Ca ratio in the population study (ages 40 to 80 yrs). The Mg/Ca ratio was in the quartiles: 1, ≤ 0.298; 2, > 0.298 - ≤ 0.318; 3, > 0.318 - ≤ 0.342; and 4, > 0.342. Given are the means and 95% confidence intervals. Number of subjects N > 500 in each quartile. Kruskal-Wallis test: probing depth, p = 0.022; attachment loss, p = 0.489; and number of teeth, p = 0.006. Trend: probing depth, p < 0.001; attachment loss, p = 0.058; and number of teeth, p < 0.001.

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 10, 937-941 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508401012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?