Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudney, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Sedgewick, G.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudney, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by Sedgewick, G.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythensis are Components of a Polymicrobial Intracellular Flora within Human Buccal Cells

J.D. Rudney1,*, R. Chen1 and G.J. Sedgewick2

1 Department of Oral Science, School of Dentistry, and
2 Biomedical Imaging and Processing Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, 17-252 Moos Tower, 515 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA;


Figure 1
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Panels A-C show images of z-section No. 39 from a stack of 74 0.2-µm z-sections (magnification 600X; the scale bar in Panel A also applies to Panels B and C). BEC in this field were double-labeled with the EUB338 universal probe (A) and the A. actinomycetemcomitans-specific probe (B). The cell in the center of Panel A contained a large mass of brightly fluorescent intracellular bacteria (red arrow). Other cells in the field contained smaller bacterial masses (not marked). Panel B shows that a portion of the large mass labeled with the universal probe also hybridized with the A. actinomycetemcomitans-specific probe (green arrow). The images from Panels A and B were superimposed (Panel C), confirming that bacteria labeled with both probes (yellow arrow) were adjacent to other bacteria labeled only with the universal probe (red arrow). Panel D presents a three-dimensional reconstruction of the same field. Bacteria recognized only by the universal probe are shown in solid red, while co-localization of the A. actinomycetemcomitans and universal probes is depicted by a green wireframe over a red interior. Reconstructed BEC surfaces are presented in blue. The red and green colors are muted when bacterial masses are intracellular, and brighter when bacteria appear to project out of the surface. The angle of view was rotated along the z-axis, and the image was zoomed. The large mass which appeared to have a lobular structure in z-section No. 39 was seen to be a cohesive unit containing A. actinomycetemcomitans in direct proximity to other species (red and green arrows).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. In Panel A, the green wireframe denotes bacteria labeled by the P. gingivalis-specific probe. There were many bacterial masses within the cell shown, but only small portions of those masses appeared to contain P. gingivalis. In Panel B, the green wireframe indicates bacteria labeled by the T. forsythensis-specific probe. Note that the upper perimeter of that cell could not be properly rendered. The cell seemed to be almost completely filled with bacteria. Large masses of T. forsythensis were present, but species recognized only by the universal probe appeared to dominate the intracellular flora (the scale bar in Panel B applies to Panel A as well).

 

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 84, No. 1, 59-63 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910508400110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?