This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wenzel, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wenzel, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bitewing and Digital Bitewing Radiography for Detection of Caries Lesions

Department of Oral Radiology, Royal Dental College, University of Aarhus, Vennelyst Blvd., DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; awenzel{at}odont.au.dk

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Differences in diagnostic accuracy (Receiver Operating Characteristics areas) for caries detection in approximal surfaces between recent digital sensor, storage phosphor, and film modalities.

View larger version (107K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Subtraction image between two digital bitewing radiographs taken in general dental practice two years apart in the same individual. Due to a non-optimal standardization of the recordings, the teeth in each jaw are subtracted separately, here the upper jaw. The box illustrates a new filling, the white circle a new deep approximal caries lesion, and the black circle progression of a former enamel lesion into the dentin.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. suppl 1, C72-C75 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408301S14


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?