This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Radhakrishnan, P. Articles by Mao, J.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Radhakrishnan, P. Articles by Mao, J.J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Nanomechanical Properties of Facial Sutures and Sutural Mineralization Front

Tissue Engineering Laboratory (MC 841), Departments of Orthodontics and Bioengineering, 801 S. Paulina Street, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612-7211, USA;

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Schematic diagrams of facial sutures under study and their typical levels of interdigitation. (A) Lateral view of the rabbit skull. MI = the maxillary incisor. PMS: the pre-maxillomaxillary suture. NFS: the nasofrontal suture. ZTS: the zygomaticotemporal suture. Different degrees of sutural interdigitation of the PMS (B), NFS (C), and ZTS (D) are confirmed by quantitative measurements of sutural interdigitation (Table). (B) ZTS diagram showing a typical straight-edge suture. (C) NFS diagram showing a moderately interdigitating suture. (D) PMS diagram showing a highly interdigitating suture. Two dots across each suture represent the locations of nano-indentation in the suture and sutural mineralization front.

View larger version (41K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Typical topographic images of the ectocranial surface of the 3 facial sutures under study by contact-mode atomic force microscopy. Surface topography of the zygomaticotemporal suture (A), the nasofrontal suture (C), the pre-maxillomaxillary suture (E), and their corresponding sutural mineralization fronts (B,D,F). The ZTS demonstrated a characteristically smooth sutural surface and gradient topographic distribution (A), whereas the NFS (C) and PMS (E) both had robust topographic variations in surface contour. In contrast, the ZTS sutural mineralization front (B) demonstrated notable topography, similar in magnitude to the topography of sutural mineralization fronts of the NFS (D) and PMS (F).

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Mechanical properties of facial sutures and sutural mineralization front (SMF). The elastic moduli of the zygomaticotemporal, nasofrontal, and pre-maxillomaxillary sutures (open histograms), and their corresponding SMF (solid histograms). All data presented as means and standard errors, and subjected to multi-group comparison by ANOVA with Bonferroni tests. The elastic moduli of the PMS and its corresponding SMF were significantly higher than those of the ZTS and NFS, and their SMF, respectively. For each suture, the elastic modulus of SMF was significantly higher than its corresponding suture (*p < 0.05). The differences in the elastic moduli between the zygomaticotemporal and nasofrontal sutures were not statistically significant, nor were differences in their corresponding SMF.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 83, No. 6, 470-475 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/154405910408300607


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?